Try cscart over at cscart.com. It's not free but it's easy to work with and
easy to skin.
_
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Darren Lovelock
Sent: 17 October 2009 22:27
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Online shop
I'm sorry but i'm going to put my 2 pence worth in. The site I build use a
H1 for the logo, then a h1 for a title further down the page, using the h1,
h2, h3, etc structure and Google seems to love those site the latest lauch
has h1, h2 and a h3 in the header and it's on page 1 already after being
Jason,
Thats clearly not the case, if you read the WIA guidlines then is
advocates the use of multiple H1's, from an semantic point of view they make
sense and in terms of SEO the make sense because every site we've built uses
mutiple H1's and they enjoy page 1 results on Google.
The video
H1?
EBS Admin - Matt doesn't say to use multiple H1s on the page, but says that
you will not get penalised for using them (within reason) on a given page.
Every site I ever worked on I had used only one H1 on and it still enjoys
being on first page of Google.
My formula, hence, does not only
arguing for putting H1 around
other content within the page, but certainly not the logo.
Sent from my BlackBerryR wireless device
_
From: EBS Admin ad...@essentialebizsolutions.net
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:36:00 +0100
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1
relevant if your site has a keyword in the logo (e.g. Free
Online Games), where each of the words is a form of a keyword, while if your
site is called MiniClip, there is not much point in wrapping H1 around it.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:52 PM, EBS Admin
ad...@essentialebizsolutions.net wrote
T: +44 (0)20-8816-8893
_
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of EBS Admin
Sent: 16 October 2009 15:52
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?
The way to wrap the H1 for the logo is not to wrap it around
Spam!
-original message-
Subject: [WSG] Spice up your mobile
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19/07/2008 3:42 pm
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
You could try this
img a:hover {
border: 0;
text-decoration: none;
}
Mat
www.essentialebizsolutions.net
www.av-iinc.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean Matthews
Sent: 03 May 2008 19:15
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re:
This is what you've got at the moment
div class=clear-fix/div
/div
div id=page-footer-links
ul id=footer-links
lia href=null.html id=footer-first-linkWisconsin History
Store/a/li
lia href=null.htmlAbout Us/a/li
lia href=null.htmlMedia Relations/a/li
lia
Dear Sir/Madam
Please note that I will be out of the office from 19 Dec 2007 until 16 Jan
2008. Urgent enquiries to this email address will be dealt with as soon as
possible, and I shall be in contact with you as soon as I have returned.
Regards
Richard Stupart
Dear Sir/Madam
Please note that I will be out of the office from 19 Dec 2007 until 16 Jan
2008. Urgent enquiries to this email address will be dealt with as soon as
possible, and I shall be in contact with you as soon as I have returned.
Regards
Richard Stupart
Semantic = meaning.
What is the meaning of highlighting the text?
If it's a design decision the use SPAN
If it's a meaning decision use STRONG or EM
Think of EM as a rise in pitch when reading something out to someone.
Think of STRONG as slow and controlled while pointing your finger kinda
It's a valid point actually.
DIVitis and SPANitis are rife and elements can normally be styled using
inherent selectors. The fact you have the text wrapped in A means you can
approach the CSS from with #container a
-Original Message-
Think twice before using a span
Just a heads up to an interesting article about the big man himself and the
future of the web; due for broadcast on the UK's BBC2 tonight 22:30 BST.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4132752.stm
Eddie
http://blog.tn38.net
**
The
It's not starting to, it always has been.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kay Smoljak
Sent: 26 July 2005 13:14
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] My life as an 800x600 leper (was: Site Check: Broadleaf)
I think
Quote: only from lists such as this where people impose limits
without thinking about how networks are evolving.
Youre assuming
everyone has DSL at low contention. As you mention, networks are evolving, more
so wirelessly where bandwidth is even more of a premium which is justification
Headers
have no defined meaning. They create structure. H1 doesnt mean primary.
H2 doesnt mean sub etc but for Joe to say that you can forget
keeping order is not one his of best ideas.
Whats
wrong with applying order to the real world?
He
is right in that you can skip levels with
Too
quick Bert, just what I was going to post.
6
headings are more than enough. Ive never gone past 4 to be honest.
-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bert Doorn
Sent: 21 July 2005 14:49
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re:
Title: Message
Not to mention youre
talking IE/Win only which is a dwindling market.
Sounds worse than
ActiveX to me J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Swabey (Lafinboy
Productions)
Sent: 18 July 2005 12:00
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
