On Mon, February 18, 2008 12:06 am, Tim White wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008 6:00 PM, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in the header of my document, I included
style type=text/css
* {
display: inline;
}
/style
OK, I just tried it and got the exact same effects. So, I tried
On Feb 19, 2008 5:35 AM, Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not so very odd...
If you hunt around through Firefox's files you'll find one named
html.css which specifies the default styling of all HTML elements. It
includes the following:
Thank you Nick. I sorta kinda knew about the
Chris Broadfoot wrote:
You have users using *older than* IE5?
I often see older browsers in the log, but in such small quantities that
they're safe to ignore. Generally speaking, browsers with only a
fraction of a percent share are safe to ignore, unless you know a reason
not to. Konqueror,
Mordechai Peller wrote:
Chris Broadfoot wrote:
You have users using *older than* IE5?
I often see older browsers in the log, but in such small quantities that
they're safe to ignore. Generally speaking, browsers with only a
fraction of a percent share are safe to ignore, unless you know a
Gday all,
This morning I was creatively thinking different things and playing
around (as you do).
I was wondering what would happen if I did a mass reset using the
asterisk to make everything inline to begin with?
So in the header of my document, I included
style type=text/css
* {
On Feb 18, 2008 10:00 AM, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that supposed to happen? And if so, why? I am honestly stumped on
this one.
All the information in the HEAD is still part of the document but is
automatically styled as { display: none; } IIRC. When you set all
elements to {
dwain wrote:
ie does not recognize the *.
dwain
IE 7 does, and it doesn't answer the question in relation to the other
browsers. What is going on?
Kat
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
ie does not recognize the *.
dwain
On 2/17/08, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gday all,
This morning I was creatively thinking different things and playing
around (as you do).
I was wondering what would happen if I did a mass reset using the
asterisk to make everything inline to begin
Katrina wrote:
I was wondering what would happen if I did a mass reset using the
asterisk to make everything inline to begin with?
So in the header of my document, I included
style type=text/css
* {
display: inline;
}
/style
Now I know that external style sheets are much smarter, I
On Feb 17, 2008 6:00 PM, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in the header of my document, I included
style type=text/css
* {
display: inline;
}
/style
OK, I just tried it and got the exact same effects. So, I tried
combinations and body * works (and I see Patrick just posted the
Katrina wrote:
dwain wrote:
ie does not recognize the *.
dwain
IE 7 does,
As do 5 and 6 (before those, don't know and don't care). After all, if
IE didn't recognize the asterisk, how would the beloved Star Hack work?
***
IE 7 does,
As do 5 and 6 (before those, don't know and don't care). After all, if
I have to care about what IE5 and 6 do ... I see from server logs lots of
people out there are still using them!
(especially IE6 ... still very common ... and there are still quite a few
IE5 Mac users
Michael MD wrote:
IE 7 does,
As do 5 and 6 (before those, don't know and don't care). After all, if
I have to care about what IE5 and 6 do ... I see from server logs lots
of people out there are still using them!
(especially IE6 ... still very common ... and there are still quite a
few
Ted Drake wrote
...
I was asked to create a nested definition list with the nested dl's looking
like simple lines of text.
...
Ted try the setup I have for my site map at
http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com/site_map.htm
The associated CSS is:
dl {
font-size: .9em;
padding: 0 0
--
From:
Drake, Ted C.
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:36
AM
Subject: [WSG] display inline
question
My mind is not working very well
today.
I've got a question for
you.
I was asked to create a nested
defin
- Original Message -
From: Drake,
Ted C.
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Sent: Wednesday, September
14, 2005 3:36 AM
Subject: [WSG] display
inline question
My mind is not working very well today.
I've got a question for you.
I was asked to create a nested
My style sheet contains this line:
.clearfix {display: inline-block;}
When I validate I get one error: Invalid number : display
inline-block is not a display value : inline-block
The word display links to
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#propdef-display.
That's CSS2, right?
I then
CSS 2 - W3C recommendation
CSS 2.1 - Working draft
Until CSS 2.1 becomes a recommendation, which shouldn't be too long
(deadline for comments was July), the W3C validator will use what ever
the current recommendation is.
Regards
Jason
**
The
CSS 2 - W3C recommendation
CSS 2.1 - Working draft
Until CSS 2.1 becomes a recommendation, which shouldn't be too long
(deadline for comments was July), the W3C validator will use what ever
the current recommendation is.
Just to be a touch pedantic, CSS2.1 only needs to become a 'candidate
SunUp wrote:
I do realise this is probably a very stupid question, and it's more
than a little scary asking a stupid question on this list, but I'll
wear the result if it means I can understand what I've done wrong.
Thanks,
sunny.
Goodness Sunny,
There really is no such thing as a stupid
John Foliot - WATS.ca
There is no such thing as a stupid question (although
occasionally we will see stupid responses...)
You tell 'em John :)
P
__
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
Patrick Lauke wrote:
John Foliot - WATS.ca
There is no such thing as a stupid question (although
occasionally we will see stupid responses...)
You tell 'em John :)
P
As a point of clarification, when I say stupid responses, I meant in the
form of condescending or mean responses, rather
22 matches
Mail list logo
