Thierry Koblentz said:
Ian Rifkin wrote:
It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It does up until XP SP2 where they changed the rules A site will have
to be trusted for CSS expression to work where JS is off.
kind
Terrence Wood wrote:
Thierry Koblentz said:
Ian Rifkin wrote:
It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It does up until XP SP2 where they changed the rules A site will
have to be trusted for CSS expression to work where
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:53:51 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
width:740px;
expression( fluid and max-width stuff )
Logically, I would expect this to work.
Set the width to 740, then reset it with the expression.
If the expression is inoperative then voila, its set to 740
I don't have time to
On 22 Oct 2005, at 2:53 pm, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:53:51 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
width:740px;
expression( fluid and max-width stuff )
Logically, I would expect this to work.
Set the width to 740, then reset it with the expression.
If the expression is inoperative
/drops from view. I've applied various new wave clearing
solutions but it still does it. Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Friday, 21 October 2005 3:46 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Set min
Thierry Koblentz skrev:
Ian Rifkin wrote:
The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
(inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe
o.k., so how do you go about setting both max- and min-width at the same time?
I tried:
width:80%;
max-width:600px;
min-width:400px;
width:expression(((document.documentElement.clientWidth)) 500 ?
'400px' : '80%');
Paul
Thankyou for that, it will be very usefull for a couple of projects I have.
The current test URL is here - http://d81314.i50.quadrahosting.com.au/ -
One word of warning in IE6 at about 960px wide browser window the
centre content drops below the calendar. It only happens in a small
range
From: Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't. But if script is used to enhance a web page, rather than
the page being dependent on the script, it is not an issue - and very
few people run IE with script disabled.
From: Lachlan Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would something like this be appropriate and still validate?
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against
Al Sparber wrote:
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against automated
checking, but technically you are using invalid code
That's a real stretch
Michael Wilson wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against automated
checking, but technically you are using invalid code
Al Sparber wrote:
From: Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
From: Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an expression hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script, the user cannot
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an expression hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script, the user cannot
Al Sparber wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an expression hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script,
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page is a mess to
begin with so it's hard to see.
Al Sparber wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page is a mess to
begin with so
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page
does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page
I first discovered these expressions quite some time ago. Sorry if I'm
stealing anyone's thunder.
http://www.svendtofte.com/code/max_width_in_ie/
Regards,
Stuart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Ok, so my final questions is... is there a fallback for expression() ?
Something in IE for expression that functions like noscript for
script?
What I am thinking of is that if someone using IE doesn't have
expression(), you may want to give them a fixed width layout as
backup.
Something like:
It seems to work from IE 5.x up. Not in the Mac version but what does? ;)
I've just added the line to the page container style in my primary
stylesheet.
Works like a treat and doesn't appear to affect Mozilla/Firefox. Haven't
checked other browsers but am eager for feedback.
-Original
The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
(inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
It can work for min width or max width.
Other browsers (mozilla based) don't recognize
Christian Montoya wrote:
OK, now you have me very excited. Does this go in external
stylesheets? How's the support for IE browsers? Other browsers? Tell
me more.
G'day Christian,
The expression code that Paul used (and which I often use myself) is
proprietary to Microsoft. IE allows some
So we're very close here then?
Would something like this be appropriate and still validate?
!--[if IE]
style type=text/css@import IE-override.css;/style
![endif]--
-Original Message-
From: Lachlan Hardy
G'day Christian,
The expression code that Paul used (and which I often use
Ian Rifkin wrote:
The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
(inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script
27 matches
Mail list logo
