For those who may be interested and haven't seen this yet, here's the address
to a CodeProject article on Silverlight 1.1 Alpha:
http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/SLFun.asp
The 1.1 Alpha now incorporates the use of C# managed code and ASP.Net.
Kind regards,
Frank M. Palinkas
Microsoft
findings yet.
Kind regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October, 2007 7:48 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] SilverLight
On 10/30/07, Frank Palinkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
It's going to be on linux as well
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/09/moonlight_silve_1.html
Moonlight is the answer
On 10/30/07, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the beta process, they were doing some flipping browser detection
**from within the plugin**, and only checked for
In the beta process, they were doing some flipping browser detection
**from within the plugin**, and only checked for Safari or Firefox, as
opposed to check for Gecko.
The demos I've seen still only work half and half on Mac browsers, except
Firefox 2.0.0.x and Safari.
what about linux
akella wrote:
It's going to be on linux as well
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/09/moonlight_silve_1.html
Moonlight is the answer
Silverlight is patent encumbered and - on Linux - it may only be
distributed by Novell (due to a patent agreement that lasts 4 years).
This means that
On 10/30/07, Christian Montoya wrote:
On 10/30/07, Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian - do you have a reference for that anywhere? I'd be really
interested in seeing it (as I'm sure others would be too!)
Just read the spec on XAML, which is what Silverlight uses:
On 10/30/07, Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Christian Montoya wrote:
On 10/30/07, Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian - do you have a reference for that anywhere? I'd be really
interested in seeing it (as I'm sure others would be too!)
Just
On 30 Oct 2007, at 16:01, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I recently spotted it in this article
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/05/11/
silverlight_programming_q_and_a/
Quoting Keith Smith, product manager of the user experience
platform and tools team at Microsoft covering Silverlight as well
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October, 2007 18:01 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] SilverLight
Quoting Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/30/07, Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you show us where they claim it is much easier
So I have to ask... what do you all think of SilverLight... do you think it
is just another way to do Flash work in a different Tech. or will it be
more?
Travis
***
List Guidelines:
: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:26 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] SilverLight
On 10/29/07, Travis D. Falls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have to ask... what do you all think of SilverLight... do you think
it
is just another way to do Flash work in a different Tech. or will it be
more
On 10/29/07, Travis D. Falls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have to ask... what do you all think of SilverLight... do you think it
is just another way to do Flash work in a different Tech. or will it be
more?
It's a little more. I've been looking into it and the distinct
difference between
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis D. Falls
Sent: Tuesday, 30 October, 2007 5:52 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] SilverLight
I know from a developer stand point... the .NET languages (C# VB.NET
IronPython etc) and XAML are a lot nicer to use. I hate ActionScript. Lol
Great
On 10/29/07, Christian Montoya wrote:
... Silverlight is rendered XML while Flash is a compiled format.
Therefore, Microsoft claims that Silverlight is much easier for screen
readers, search spiders, etc. to work with.
Christian - do you have a reference for that anywhere? I'd be really
On 10/30/07, Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/07, Christian Montoya wrote:
... Silverlight is rendered XML while Flash is a compiled format.
Therefore, Microsoft claims that Silverlight is much easier for screen
readers, search spiders, etc. to work with.
Christian - do
On 10/30/07, Frank Palinkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From an accessibility aspect, a screen scrapper maybe be able to do its job.
However, any attempt to work the markup will be futile.
Obviously this wouldn't be as easy as understanding plain HTML markup,
but what I was saying was that a
On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Michael MD wrote:
The Silverlight build process produces a .dll. You need the
Silverlight
plug-in to render the resulting html page. Also, from a quick
test, it will
only render in IE and the Gecko range. Forget Opera, Safari for
windows, etc.
If they are
The Silverlight build process produces a .dll. You need the Silverlight
plug-in to render the resulting html page. Also, from a quick test, it
will
only render in IE and the Gecko range. Forget Opera, Safari for windows,
etc.
If they are really serious about getting people to use Silverlight
Travis D. Falls wrote:
So I have to ask... what do you all think of SilverLight... do you think it
is just another way to do Flash work in a different Tech. or will it be
more?
Another way of doing the same stuff.
The backend tech of Silverlight is a minimal install of .Net, so you get
a
19 matches
Mail list logo
