heretic wrote:
I wanted to understand why this happened. Is standards only really
something a small contingent of geeky developers go for?
I think it's fair to say that standards developers are still the
minority, but that doesn't make them wrong. "What's right is not
always
> I wanted to understand why this happened. Is standards only really
> something a small contingent of geeky developers go for?
I think it's fair to say that standards developers are still the
minority, but that doesn't make them wrong. "What's right is not
always popular, what's popular is not al
Some people write as if there were a club, a them and us, people who get
it and people who don't, and never the twain shall meet.
My original post was not meant to seperate 'standardistas' from the rest
of the industry.
It's just that I thought Standards Were the Way Things Were Done by
Hi there,
> I've been on this list since returning from WE05 in Sydney last October,
> hoping that the same feeling of sharing and openness would prevail. It does
> to a certain extent, but the few glaring exceptions have tended to put me
> off posting to the list.
I doubt an email list could eve
r the year!
lisa
> -Original Message-
> From: Helen Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 February 2006 12:56 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Web Standards Shetland Ponies
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been on this list sin
Hi folks,
I've been on this list since returning from WE05 in Sydney last October,
hoping that the same feeling of sharing and openness would prevail. It does
to a certain extent, but the few glaring exceptions have tended to put me
off posting to the list.
Some people write as if there were
