Nick Lo wrote:
I agree it appears that way now but I think it's a little too
easy/early to suggest it is and will end up that way. In that respect
it'll be interesting to watch it develop.
On a site of this massive scale I'd be very surprised if there are not
a bunch of pretty screwed on heads
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still seeing the
tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
--
listening to: background noise
http://wiki.workalone.co.uk
http://www.xebit.net
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still seeing
the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
Here you go:
http://www.yahoo.com/?r=1096530966
I have no clue if there is some selection going on there
Weird indeed. From home, I see the new table-less design. From work here, it's still
the old one...
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Tony Crockford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2004 09:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing
I'm a bit confused
At 09:34 on Thursday, 30 Sep 2004, Mugur Padurean wrote:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still seeing
the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
Here you go:
http://www.yahoo.com/?r=1096530966
Are you behind a caching proxy or something at work?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 30-Sep-04 6:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:RE: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing
Weird indeed. From home, I see the new table-less design. From
: donderdag 30 september 2004 11:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing
At 09:34 on Thursday, 30 Sep 2004, Mugur Padurean wrote:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still seeing
the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale
table-less design. From work here,
it's still the old one...
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Tony Crockford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2004 09:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http
Message -
From: Tony Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing
At 09:34 on Thursday, 30 Sep 2004, Mugur Padurean wrote:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still seeing
Tony Crockford wrote:
At 09:34 on Thursday, 30 Sep 2004, Mugur Padurean wrote:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still
seeing the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
Here you go:
09:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm
still seeing the
tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
--
listening to: background noise
http://wiki.workalone.co.uk
http
Tony Crockford wrote:
At 09:34 on Thursday, 30 Sep 2004, Mugur Padurean wrote:
Tony Crockford wrote:
I'm a bit confused, if I go to http://www.yahoo.com/ I'm still
seeing the tabled version.
have they got some clever locale sniffing going on or what?
(I'm in the UK)
Here you go:
Let's give Yahoo our feedback. They provide a way to receive feedback using the link
under the search box. True, our comments may fall on deaf ears, or they may not. But
from my experience, numbers do matter, so I filled out the feedback form and voiced my
option on their partial move to
Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
Let's give Yahoo our feedback. They provide a way to receive feedback using the link
under the search box. True, our comments may fall on deaf ears, or they may not. But
from my experience, numbers do matter, so I filled out the feedback form and voiced my
--- brian cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
Let's give Yahoo our feedback. They provide a way
to receive feedback using the link under the search
box. True, our comments may fall on deaf ears, or
they may not. But from my experience, numbers do
matter,
http://9rules.com/whitespace/css_redesigns/yahoo_css_redesign.php
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in
Nick Lo wrote:
http://9rules.com/whitespace/css_redesigns/yahoo_css_redesign.php
Good writeup- but I must say yahoo has done a horid job so far.
HTML Errors: 223
The css validates, but it is horrid.
in 2 days, how could one ever remember what #v or where#v #v4.h appears
in the document?
IMO,
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Good writeup- but I must say yahoo has done a horid job so far.
HTML Errors: 223
The css validates, but it is horrid.
in 2 days, how could one ever remember what #v or where#v #v4.h appears
in the document?
IMO, they need to get some developers in there who actually know
I agree it appears that way now but I think it's a little too
easy/early to suggest it is and will end up that way. In that respect
it'll be interesting to watch it develop.
On a site of this massive scale I'd be very surprised if there are not
a bunch of pretty screwed on heads knocking
Darren Wood wrote:
I think you're missing the point...agreed the code is well shoddy,
but, as Scrivs says, this is a major step forward for the web. If the
best/most popular site on the web is tableless and moving towards
complete web standards, then it becomes very easy for us to sell
20 matches
Mail list logo
