On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:25:41 +1000, Lea de Groot wrote:
> ALRIGHT!! ENOUGH!!
And I've just had it pointed out that I used unacceptable language in
my last post!
My abject apologies - it was completely unintentional.
warmly,
Lea
**
The discussion
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:07:15 +1100, Chris Stratford wrote:
> Sorry just another point.
ALRIGHT!! ENOUGH!!
This thread has clearly been closed TWICE now.
(Yes, in case you were wondering, I AM YELLING!)
Any more posts in this thread without a damn good reason[1] will see
some public finger pointi
Sorry just another point.
There is a MUCH BETTER way to spamdex without effecting anyone here.
I haven't used it before, but I have thought about it a lot.
You can simply add your spam div, when the user_agent is a googlebot,
msnbot, yahoobot etc...
If you dont know the user agents for the bots si
Guys (in a very inclusive fashion), the thread is still closed.
Now, imagine a big red 'closed' stamp coming down across it.
warmly,
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
WSG Core member
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webst
It was said:
I've an idea. Quite a few people run personal sites that allow people
to leave comments. You could create a script that automatically leaves
comments on their site along with a link. That way you'd inherit some
of their Google juice.
Another method would be to send lots of emails to ra
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:04:40 -0800, Rick Faaberg wrote:
> This list is way out of control and I'm going to leave unless somebody
> retakes control. I do care about this list when it's under control -
> otherwise, bye bye.
'How can i stay within Web Standards while spamming the search engines'
is
On 2/4/05 2:01 AM "csslist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> Another method would be to send lots of emails to random people
>
> YEAH!! spam them to death lol
>
This list is way out of control and I'm going to leave unless somebody
retakes control. I do care about this list when it's under
Another method would be to send lots of emails to random people YEAH!! spam them to death lol From: Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:49 AMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] cover me -- I'm gonna be naughty!Ted Drake wrote:> But if we need
Ted Drake wrote:
But if we need to do it to be competitive, would this at least protect
those that are innocent, the people who need to use screenreaders?
I've an idea. Quite a few people run personal sites that allow people
to leave comments. You could create a script that automatically leaves
005 11:42 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] cover me -- I'm gonna be naughty!
For those covering your ears and eyes screaming N! I know it is a
bad thing to spam your keywords. But if we need to do it to be competitive,
**
The
or. Some good reason, above the obvious ethical reasons, to maintain
standards and avoid using css to spam a page.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:09 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] cove
Ted wrote:
>For those covering your ears and eyes screaming N!
>I know it is a bad thing to spam your keywords. But if we
>need to do it to be competitive, would this at least protect
>those that are innocent, the people who need to use screenreaders?
Are you willing to risk your client's
Ted Drake wrote:
I know it is a bad thing to spam your keywords. But if we need to do it to be competitive,
Sorry if I sound flippant, but if the business' competitiveness can only
be maintained by spamming, then I'd say there's a fundamental business
problem there.
> would this at least protec
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:42 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] cover me -- I'm gonna be naughty!
The recent discussion of css and seo had me wondering.
I have convinced the big wigs that although search engi
The recent discussion of css and seo had me wondering.
I have convinced the big wigs that although search engine rankings are very
important, and they are with our very competitive keyword, we need to maintain
accessibility. I have kept our alt tags pure, our h1 tags are using an image
replacem
15 matches
Mail list logo
