This tangent has gotten quite interesting and turned out to be very
informative indeed
here is a basic prototype of a site I am making, still early doors yet
http://s107442706.websitehome.co.uk/kos5/flash/
I am using flashObject to place the swf in the page. users with a
version of flash les
I can't see what the point is. The W3C has no control over Java or
many other technologies that are proprietry or closed, but that does
not stop them from becoming or meeting W3C standards or compliance.
The original question asked why the W3C hadn't written a spec for
Flash. My answer still st
Patrick Lauke wrote:
Geoff Deering
True, but that does mean that the W3C is in a position to release
a spec for the *format*.
I can't see what the point is. The W3C has no control over
Java or many
other technologies that are proprietry or closed, but that
does not stop
them fro
> Geoff Deering
> >True, but that does mean that the W3C is in a position to release
> >a spec for the *format*.
>
> I can't see what the point is. The W3C has no control over
> Java or many
> other technologies that are proprietry or closed, but that
> does not stop
> them from becoming or
Patrick Lauke wrote:
Geoff Deering
It's actually the other way around, companies and organisation
developing technologies are encourage to develop them
according to W3C
recommendations.
That still does not detract from the fact that the Flash format
is not a W3C technology.
The U
> Geoff Deering
> It's actually the other way around, companies and organisation
> developing technologies are encourage to develop them
> according to W3C
> recommendations.
That still does not detract from the fact that the Flash format
is not a W3C technology.
> The UAAG applies to Flash.
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
And now I just realised that the original question was not about
accessibility, but about specifications in general (such as the
XHTML/CSS/etc ones). In which case, even more of a reason why the W3C
can't release a spec for Flash: it's not their technology. They can't
re
> Is flashObject the best method for encorperating flash into pages?
> as aposed to others plain mark up (object / embed), flash Satay, or sIFR
>
I think sIFR should be left out of this because it's goal is
different. You can't have general flash content with sIFR - it's for
typographical enh
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So.
On 5/19/05, Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nancy Johnson wrote:
Is it true that the W3C has not done a spec for Flash? If that is so
why?
Because Flash is a proprietary product!
So, the W3C is the web's standards body, and they only defi
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
So, the W3C is the web's standards body, and they only define guidelines
for making official W3C technologies accessible.
And now I just realised that the original question was not about
accessibility, but about specifications in general (such as the
XHTML/CSS/etc ones).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So.
On 5/19/05, Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nancy Johnson wrote:
Is it true that the W3C has not done a spec for Flash? If that is so
why?
Because Flash is a proprietary product!
So, the W3C is the web's standards body, and they only define guidelines
for making
So.
On 5/19/05, Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nancy Johnson wrote:
>
> > Is it true that the W3C has not done a spec for Flash? If that is so
> > why?
>
> Because Flash is a proprietary product!
>
>
> Yours
>
> Andy Budd
>
> http://www.andybudd.com/
> 01273 241355
> 07880 636677
>
Nancy Johnson wrote:
Is it true that the W3C has not done a spec for Flash? If that is so
why?
Because Flash is a proprietary product!
Yours
Andy Budd
http://www.andybudd.com/
01273 241355
07880 636677
Come see me speak at @Media2005 in London, England, 9-10th Jun.
***
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 17 May 2005 17:13>To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org>Subject: [WSG] make poverty history website>>Hi List,>>I visited the www.makepovertyhistory.org website last night and was pleased to see that the site uses Geoff Sterns FlashObject. This seems to reaf
---Original Message-
From: sam sherlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2005 17:13
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] make poverty history website
Hi List,
I visited the www.makepovertyhistory.org website last night and was pleased to
see that the site uses Geoff Sterns FlashOb
e
2k:)2
-Original Message-
From: sam sherlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 May 2005 17:13
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] make poverty history website
Hi List,
I visite
Hi List,
I visited the www.makepovertyhistory.org website last night and was
pleased to see that the site uses Geoff Sterns FlashObject. This seems
to reaffirm my opinion that the flashObject method of placing flash in
the page is more approprate than the MM object / embed code and flash
satay
17 matches
Mail list logo
