Surely you don't mean that ;-)
On Sat, June 30, 2007 2:49 am, Chris Price wrote:
My thinking was that my real aim is to make the data useful so just
making it valid or logical may not be my prime concern.
Kind Regards
--
Chris Price
Choctaw
--
Stuart Foulstone.
On 30 Jun 2007, at 4:11 PM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Surely you don't mean that ;-)
On Sat, June 30, 2007 2:49 am, Chris Price wrote:
My thinking was that my real aim is to make the data useful so just
making it valid or logical may not be my prime concern.
Kind Regards
--
Chris Price
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On 30 Jun 2007, at 4:11 PM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Surely you don't mean that ;-)
On Sat, June 30, 2007 2:49 am, Chris Price wrote:
My thinking was that my real aim is to make the data useful so just
making it valid or logical may not be my prime concern.
Yes, I
On 30 Jun 2007, at 6:07 PM, Chris Price wrote:
I didn't say I would be happy for it to be invalid but poor design
that validates isn't useful.
No, you said, .. so just making it valid or logical may not be my
prime concern. The point is, and the reason Philippe pointed out that
your code
On Jun 28, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Chris Price wrote:
I thought I had scope, cols and colgroups figured out until I built
a table that clearly showed that I hadn't.
I have built a simplified table that illustrates this at http://
choctaw.co.uk/tabletest/
I want all all min columns coloured
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Chris Price wrote:
I have built a simplified table that illustrates this at
http://choctaw.co.uk/tabletest/
Your page is invalid.
1. a colgroup cannot be nested in another colgroup
I thought I had scope, cols and colgroups figured out until I built a
table that clearly showed that I hadn't.
I have built a simplified table that illustrates this at
http://choctaw.co.uk/tabletest/
I want all all min columns coloured green and max columns coloured
yellow but more than
