Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
TextPattern works well, particularly now that they've released a final
version. I used WordPress up until v.1.5 due to TXP being in beta and
RC versions, but have since slowly switched to TXP for all my sites.
The only site I can think of at the moment that is
Lloyd wrote:
Guys,
Thanks for all the feedback! Backend is important as one of our
content providers is blind. Does anyone know much more about Joomla?
They are possibly prepared to upgrade (As they see this is just the
same thing). I want to know whether its possible to do this with
either
Plz dont send me any mail onword..
otherwise i'll.!!1
On 12/1/05, Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,I have been asked to work on a web site and Mambo is the current CMSbeing used. They want to, if possible, keep Mambo as they're CMS but
upon
Hi all,
Weused Textpattern for http://www.bustahouse.com/and http://www.selfcateringshetland.com/
It's a really nice solution for putting together sites. My main concern with Textpattern is teaching clients how to use it, as the sections/categories model is sometimes a little tricky for them to
I gave up trying to do anything with Mambo.
Expression Engine, Movable Type, and Wordpress are Standards based and
simple and easy to configure, All three validate out of the box and don't
require a two year course and beating your head on the desk to
reconfigureafter several years of trying
Woops, missed this:
If Mambo can be configured easy, as some claim, why has there not been a ton
of templates available long ago??? On different CMS type forums I see
problems mambo related all the time...
Nuff said ;-)
Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd
] En
nombre de Bruce
Enviado el: jueves, 01 de diciembre de 2005 13:26
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility
Woops, missed this:
If Mambo can be configured easy, as some claim, why has there not been a ton
of templates available long ago??? On different CMS type
I am a big fan of Wordpress [1]. I personally use it, as well as use it on a lot of projects for clients. I have found it very easy to configure. If you know a HTML and a little PHP, it is very versatile.For one project, I was tasked with taking a look at the accessibility of Mambo and the
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
...
Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason
for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with
accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?
Is there another CMS that you would mention
What about www.textpattern.com
has anyone tried this?
~n
uoting Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
...
Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from
, December 01, 2005 8:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:15:13 +0800
Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
...
Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason
for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site
TextPattern works well, particularly now that they've released a
final version. I used WordPress up until v.1.5 due to TXP being in
beta and RC versions, but have since slowly switched to TXP for all
my sites. The only site I can think of at the moment that is running
TXP (and doing a
Lloyd said:
Is there a way to make Mambo compatible (A large reason for the work
is to allow blind users to get value from the site) with accessiblily
and hopefully web standards?
Are you refering to the the CMS interface itself (i.e. the admin bits) or
to the public facing output?
Most CMS's
Except that they still insist on membership before you can view such pages.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2005 4:15 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility
If you want to find out which CMS is good for your needs, you might
want to check out:
http://www.opensourcecms.com/
They have live installs of maybe hundreds of CMS, all rated, user
comments, organized in categories. The installs are wiped every 2
hours, so you can go in with the demo password
December 2005 8:47 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility
If you want to find out which CMS is good for your needs, you might want to
check out:
http://www.opensourcecms.com/
They have live installs of maybe hundreds of CMS, all rated, user comments,
organized
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2005 4:15 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Mambo Accessibility
www.GAWDS.org (Guild of Accessible Web Developers) has a fully
accessible
CMS platform
I've never used it myself, but you might want to take a
look at Joomla. It's compatible with Mambo at this point
http://www.joomla.org/index.php?Itemid=44option=com_faqcatid=7
and the developers are at least are trying to be compliant
and accessible
Michael Donnermeyer deftly quothed:
...if you take the time to look.
Ahem. Yes. Thank you, Michael. :*
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on
Hello Michael,
I used WordPress up until v.1.5 due to TXP being in
beta and RC versions, but have since slowly switched to TXP for all
my sites. The only site I can think of at the moment that is running
TXP (and doing a good job of it) is Hicks Design (http://
Guys,
Thanks for all the feedback! Backend is important as one of our
content providers is blind. Does anyone know much more about Joomla?
They are possibly prepared to upgrade (As they see this is just the
same thing). I want to know whether its possible to do this with
either Mambo or Joomla
21 matches
Mail list logo
