On 2007/06/04 10:06 (GMT-0700) Paul Novitski apparently typed:
Felix Miata wrote:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/Sites/ksc/
On 2007/06/04 01:41 (GMT-0700) Paul Novitski apparently typed:
In Firefox 2, when the window width becomes too narrow and/or the
text size becomes too large to
On 2007/06/04 12:33 (GMT-0400) Philip Kiff apparently typed:
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2007/06/02 11:06 (GMT+0100) Designer apparently typed:
Sparked partly by the recent discussions on elasticity, I've been
attempting to put together a 'template', based on em's and with a
max-width.
[]
Felix Miata wrote:
All that said, the way I judge the readability of any page is by the size of
the bulk of its content and main navigation, not by a couple of minimal
importance non-primary-content lines it contains.
By that standard, Bob's is a substantial distance from comfortable to read,
Bob,
You have to take everything that Felix says with a grain of salt to
say the least.
Don't get into a p***ing contest with his judgement of font sizes.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 6, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Designer wrote:
Felix
On 2007/06/06 19:45 (GMT+0100) Designer apparently typed:
Felix Miata wrote:
All that said, the way I judge the readability of any page is by the size of
the bulk of its content and main navigation, not by a couple of minimal
importance non-primary-content lines it contains.
By that
Philip Kiff wrote:
As Felix points out, your current template breaks IE's built-in font resizer
(View - Text Size - Larger/Largest). This problem is caused by your
definition of the default body text size as 14px. The use of “px”
measurements for font sizes is not scalable under Microsoft
On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Designer wrote:
... the htmlbody is ignored by all except IE6
I hope this is a typo. IE 6 ignores this (and NN4 in case you worry)
as it doesn't understand the '' selector. All other browsers,
including IE 7 support the child selector.
Philippe
---
Philippe
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Designer wrote:
... the htmlbody is ignored by all except IE6
I hope this is a typo. IE 6 ignores this (and NN4 in case you worry) as
it doesn't understand the '' selector. All other browsers, including IE
7 support the child
On 5 Jun 2007, at 12:09:44, Designer wrote:
so the decent browsers work properly (even IE7!)
This is a common misconception. IE7 _cannot_ resize text whose size
is specified in pixels, in precisely the same way that IE6 can't.
The use of the page zoom tool will enlarge or shrink it along
On 5 Jun 2007, at 19:15:39, Designer wrote:
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
This is a common misconception. IE7 _cannot_ resize text whose
size is specified in pixels, in precisely the same way that IE6
can't.
The use of the page zoom tool will enlarge or shrink it along with
the other content of
At 6/3/2007 08:36 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/Sites/ksc/dancesrqb.html is the same
basic layout, but without breaking IE's font resizer, with no
special treatment for antique browsers, and without disrespecting the
visitor's choice of font size.
In Firefox 2, when
On 2007/06/04 01:41 (GMT-0700) Paul Novitski apparently typed:
At 6/3/2007 08:36 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/Sites/ksc/dancesrqb.html is the same
basic layout, but without breaking IE's font resizer, with no
special treatment for antique browsers, and without
Felix Miata wrote on EDT:
On 2007/06/02 11:06 (GMT+0100) Designer apparently typed:
Sparked partly by the recent discussions on elasticity, I've been
attempting to put together a 'template', based on em's and with a
max-width.
[]
You can see it at:
At 6/3/2007 08:36 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/Sites/ksc/dancesrqb.html
On 2007/06/04 01:41 (GMT-0700) Paul Novitski apparently typed:
In Firefox 2, when the window width becomes too narrow and/or the
text size becomes too large to allow the headline The Dancer's
Designer wrote:
Sparked partly by the recent discussions on elasticity, I've been
attempting to put together a 'template', based on em's and with a
max-width. I've used an expression for max-width in IE 7 (pinched
from Georg!). I've tested it in FF1.5, IE6 IE7, Opera 9, and Netscape
4.02.
On 2007/06/02 11:06 (GMT+0100) Designer apparently typed:
Sparked partly by the recent discussions on elasticity, I've been
attempting to put together a 'template', based on em's and with a
max-width. I've used an expression for max-width in IE 7 (pinched from
Georg!). I've tested it in
Designer wrote:
Sparked partly by the recent discussions on elasticity, I've been
attempting to put together a 'template', based on em's and with a
max-width.
http://www.marscovista.fsnet.co.uk/newtemplate/template.html
Hi Bob
I think it looks good at 1024x768 and 800x600 but at 1280x1024
At 6/2/2007 03:06 AM, Designer wrote:
Sparked partly by the recent discussions on elasticity, I've been
attempting to put together a 'template', based on em's and with a
max-width. I've used an expression for max-width in IE 7 (pinched
from Georg!). I've tested it in FF1.5, IE6 IE7, Opera 9,
Paul Novitski wrote:
You chose a background image for the header that nicely repeats
horizontally as the page expands. To be more versatile I think it
ought to repeat vertically as well to support high enlargement in
modest window widths.
At 6/2/2007 11:08 AM, Designer wrote:
I think I'm
On 2 Jun 2007, at 8:06 PM, Designer wrote:
I've used a simple table
Nothing wrong with that, if NN4.x is in your group of target browsers.
But you might like to consider adding a rule to your css so that the
content of the RH column is anchored to the top of the cell - at
present it's
20 matches
Mail list logo
