Hi,
I'm trying to find a CSS/image solution for a menu (not enough room for
text based menu) and I found Dan Cederholms
http://www.simplebits.com/bits/tab_rollovers.html which looks fine in
IE6/Opera but no go with FF 1.0.
So now I wonder... does it just don't work with FF?
Kim
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find a CSS/image solution for a menu (not enough room for
text based menu) and I found Dan Cederholms
http://www.simplebits.com/bits/tab_rollovers.html which looks fine in
IE6/Opera but no go with FF 1.0.
So
Sorry for the stupid post... I set FF to show imgs for the originating
site only.
Kim
Christian Sonne wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find a CSS/image solution for a menu (not enough room for
text based menu) and I found Dan Cederholms
works correct in IE 6, Opera, but not in FF1.0, NS7.2! (works only if you
have rolled over the buttons first)
with XP SP1,
but read the postings in
http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2003/09/30/accessible_imagetab_rollovers.html
there is discussed about this problem...
greetings
johannes
no, I don't think this is the problem, because I set FF NOT for the
originating site only and it doesn't work the first time you call the site
...
it works only if you reload the site or rollover the buttons ...
johannes
- Original Message -
From: Kim Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi folks,
Can anyone help as to why (in IE at least) it's not possible to select/copy
text without selecting other content automatically in this page?
http://www.marketingmixers.com/new.php
This happens to me a lot on CSS layouts but I've never had a definitive
explanation. This time, a
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 04:17:35PM +0100, Johannes Reiss wrote:
no, I don't think this is the problem, because I set FF NOT for the
originating site only and it doesn't work the first time you call the site
...
it works only if you reload the site or rollover the buttons ...
Ahh! - the site
Aaron Pollock wrote:
Can anyone help as to why (in IE at least) it's not possible to select/copy
text without selecting other content automatically in this page?
It seems to be a known IE bug. Haven't heard of any workarounds,
unfortunately...
Patrick H. Lauke
--
perhaps helps:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum83/4846.htm
greetings
johannes
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 5:10 PM
Subject: [WSG] Text selection in CSS layouts
Hi folks,
Can anyone help as
Aaron Pollock wrote:
Can anyone help as to why (in IE at least) it's not possible to select/copy
text without selecting other content automatically in this page?
http://www.marketingmixers.com/new.php
This happens to me a lot on CSS layouts but I've never had a definitive
explanation. This time, a
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
john wrote on Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:26:19 +:
For the most part, the debute of my standards-friendly redesign has
been met with great fanfare, but I've been receiving a few emails from
people saying that the text is way too small. This, I do not
understand, as I've used em to specify font
Thank you for the detailed reply, Felix. You've certainly given me
something to think about and work on.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 11/27/2004 6:21 PM Felix Miata said the following:
john wrote on Fri, 26 Nov 2004
Geez, and here I thought I had covered all the bases...*sigh*
I've been getting several emails from visitors saying they're using AOL
or Netscape 7.1 and they're not seeing the CSS.
I'm completely lost with this one. Any thoughts?
http://cslewis.drzeus.net
--
~john
_
Dr.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:19:24 +, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been getting several emails from visitors saying they're using AOL
or Netscape 7.1 and they're not seeing the CSS.
Check the list archives - this came up just last week, It sounds like
your server is serving the css files as
Hello All,
At the following url:
working.ckimedia.com/index.php
I've a nav ul that i would like to highlight, with a pencil underline
graphic, my boggle is the background. A gif or jpg will not work with
background image, so I would like to use a PNG. What graceful solution
exists for
good evening -
I've set up my site to serve as XHTML 1.1 - the entire site is
actually a single PHP file that parses a bunch of XML. my problem
comes in on a few pages where I am actually serving an e-mail archive,
some of which contains some not very well written HTML (hotmail
actually). I
You can't render a part of a page as HTML, but it is possible to let
PHP parse all pages with some variable or something like that as HTML
instead of XHTML.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:51:21 -0500, Jonathan T. Sage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good evening -
I've set up my site to serve as XHTML
IE will handle 8 bit transparency (same as gif) in a PNG just fine, you
don't need to do anything.
24 bit transparency support requires some IE only work-arounds.
See: http://devilock.mine.nu/pixie/
as a behavior: http://webfx.eae.net/dhtml/pngbehavior/pngbehavior.html
or as javascript:
alright, dumb question anyway. My original expectation on all these
includes was that the incoming file was plaintext, with only br /
replacments on newlines. A little php magic and I just dumped the
rest of the markup. Thanks for the time
~j
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:55:14 +0100, Rob Mientjes
Chris Kennon wrote:
I would like to use a PNG. What graceful solution
exists for accommodating IE?
Provide an 8 bit fallback PNG for IE, set as default background, and
then use some CSS that IE doesn't understand (e.g. using child
selectors) to set the background to the 24 bit one instead.
Not
Lawrence Carriere wrote:
Note the footer. I want it to be the same height and width and always on the
bottom (no matter how much content there is).
With CSS, it's simple: {position : fixed; bottom : 0;}
The problem is you-know-who doesn't support it. So you second choice is
JavaScript. IIRC, ALA
Derek Featherstone wrote:
As for using onkeypress, if the validators (by which I assume you mean
Bobby, et al) then, they need to get a clue. The automated tool is only
there to help, not to be the final arbiter of what is and isn't accessible.
Another solution is not to use in-line JavaScript.
I may be missing something here but when WinXP SP2 was installed on all
the PCs at work, all it seemed to block were (popup) windows that opened
automatically (i.e. onLoad). A link that requires a click, such as:
a href=http://google.com/; onclick=window.open(this.href,
Mordechai Peller wrote:
Another solution is not to use in-line JavaScript. Unless they check
external script files (which I don't think they do, but I could be
wrong)
if your script attaches onclick behaviours on load via the DOM, i
seriously doubt that bobby will pick this up. to do that, it
Mark Harwood WebMail wrote:
Now we have just run a SiteMore.com check on part of the development site and it
has come back kicking and screaming at us as we are using WIDTH and HEIGHT on
table's and ALIGN on img /'s
It shouldn't be that difficult to write a small program to go through
the
Hi there CSS-Crew..
I have never posted anything on here yet, so please bear with me ..
I'm trying to layout this page in CSS, but I have forced myself not to use
tables, and as you can see the pictures are not aligning with their
corresponding text boxes...
could anyone suggest anything that
I see the css in netscape 7.1 using a regular ISP.
On 11/27/2004 5:19:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, and here I thought I had covered all the bases...*sigh*
I've been getting several emails from visitors saying they're using AOL
or Netscape 7.1 and they're not seeing the CSS.
I'm
added this to #client, is this the idea your looking for?
clear: both;
margin-bottom: 50px;
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:27:56 +1100, Joshua Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there CSS-Crew..
I have never posted anything on here yet, so please bear with me ..
I'm trying to layout this page
29 matches
Mail list logo
