On 22/5/05 10:23 AM, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I was talking about the user, not the designer. Most browsers do not offer a
Print Preview option
Getting off topic (so perhaps email me back off list) but: which
browsers exactly?
I can't speak for
On 5/23/05 11:33 PM Kevin Futter [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent
this out:
I can't speak for all browsers, but I do find it annoying that Firefox on
Windows has the print preview option, but Firefox on the Mac does not
(latest versions). Makes it hard to recommend for verifying print output
(assuming
Nothing wrong with styling states with CSS, but there is plenty wrong
with using javascript to overwrite CSS states when you could do
exactly the same thing with CSS.
However, adding javascript to make a browser work like the others do
is fine, but you should try to compress it some what, to save
Thanks Guys much apreciated.
On 5/20/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2005 15:17:19 +0100, Peter Costello wrote:
However, even though theres only one item, the dl seems like the
most appropriate tag.
Yep, if semantically its a list which just happens to have only
On 5/24/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is said that flyout and dropdown menus belong to the behavior layer and
that CSS should not be used to accomplish such things.
Also, because this technique relies on CSS *and* Scripting it overlaps 2
layers; and that's supposed to be bad
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:00 +0200, Michael Lykke wrote:
Im just wondering - Cause sometimes it seems to me that alot of effort
is put into making something correct way beyond just adhering to the
webstandards. Like asking whether it is ok to use list definitions
when the list only has a single
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Nothing wrong with styling states with CSS, but there is plenty wrong
with using javascript to overwrite CSS states when you could do
exactly the same thing with CSS.
However, adding javascript to make a browser work like the others do
is fine, but you should try to
Hello list,
Need a little help. I am building a page -
http://66.155.251.18/platformrg.com/ - that was designed in a hard
grid. Can I tweak this so that when text is scaled up, the boxes
expand, at least vertically, to allow for the larger type as well as
having the boxes maintain a
Hi Tom
Try changing the div widths form px to em, this allows it to stretch
although I'm not sure what the conversion is, I think it's dependent on
a few other things.
Hope this helps some
Graham Bancroft.
**
The discussion list for
Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello list,
Need a little help. I am building a page -
http://66.155.251.18/platformrg.com/ - that was designed in a hard
grid. Can I tweak this so that when text is scaled up, the boxes
expand, at least vertically, to allow for the larger type as well as
having the
I know in CSS, there is a method to select the 'first child' of an
element, as well as the 'first adjacent element', within an element.
However, is there a way to select the 'next adjacent element' - within
the same parent?
Example:
div class=picture
/div
h3Headline/h3
pParagraph text/p
Do you mean something like
div.picture + h3 {...}
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
div class=picture
h3.../h3
/div
.. rather than this:
div class=picture
...
/div
h3.../h3
Matt Thommes wrote:
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
Have a good read through http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/selector.html
--
Patrick H. Lauke
On May 24, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I think it'd be easier to start from scratch.
My first reaction was... Yikes!, Are you nuts!, but then as I looked at
it the light bulb came on over my head. I did redo it, although it
isn't fabulous, it's useable at a couple of clicks
On May 24, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
On May 24, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I think it'd be easier to start from scratch.
My first reaction was... Yikes!, Are you nuts!
Me again,
http://66.155.251.18/platformrg.com/people/
In IE5.5/6Win (and Opera 8 MAC) I
Tom Livingston wrote:
My first reaction was... Yikes!, Are you nuts!
Me again,
http://66.155.251.18/platformrg.com/people/
In IE5.5/6Win (and Opera 8 MAC) I am seeing extra space under the
image and can't figure out where the heck it's coming from. Can you?
This is normal behavior. It's
I'm just saying that its silly to reinvent things like :hover with
javascript and DOM but its perfectly fine to write javascript to fix
browser incompatability (IE doesn't support :hover on all elements).
On 5/25/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Nothing wrong
Hi Russ or Peter,
Where can I get to CMS list archive on WSG website? I don't see it in
mail-archive.com.
I saw a couple of thread on
http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/archive.cfm after logged in, but it's
hard to find related topic that I am interested in. It mix with WSG thread.
Regards,
Hi tee,
As you've found both lists are bundled together in the local archive, but
the CMS list is separate in mail-archive.com (which Russ Weakley redesigned
for them a while back btw):
http://www.mail-archive.com/cms%40webstandardsgroup.org/
Or (a little easier to remember)
How well supported is this method - the +??
Any documentation of that?
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Matt Thommes wrote:
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
Have a good read through
On 25 May 2005, at 9:42 am, Chris Stratford wrote:
How well supported is this method - the +??
Any documentation of that?
The usual suspects: Firefox, Safari, Omniweb, Opera, IE Mac all handle
this correctly.
For the browser with way too much market share, you'll need Dean's IE7.
subtitle: I blew it!
OK, small change to the June Brisbane Meeting - its the 14th, not the
7th! Venue and details unchanged - I just got the date wrong. Oops!
(How I ever thought the 2nd tuesday in the month could be the 7th, I
don't know. I'll blame it on lack of sleep and excessive stress.
On 5/24/05, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of interest: why not simply provide the alternative content inside
the OBJECT element, as per specification? If the OBJECT itself can't be
displayed (e.g. Flash is not installed), then the alternative is
displayed...all without getting
Thanks for your email.
Please note that I'm out of the office today attending an industry exhibition.
I'll respond to your email when I return tomorrow. Please don't reply to this
address: it will bounce into cyberspace (to avoid mail looping problems).
Kind regards,
Dean
-- --
Thanks for your email.
Please note that I'm out of the office today attending an industry exhibition.
I'll respond to your email when I return tomorrow. Please don't reply to this
address: it will bounce into cyberspace (to avoid mail looping problems).
Kind regards,
Dean
-- --
I thought that if Flash wasn't installed, the browser would prompt you
to download and install it rather than just displaying the alternate
content?
Not necessarily - plus many browsers now give the option to *disable*
the plugin which may result in different behaviour. For example I use
I'm not here to bash Flash - used properly, I'm a big fan.
My concern when I developed the JavaScript detection method we use was
to find a way that would work seamlessly as expected without nagging
the user in as many different situations and browsers as possible -
including IE5 which seems a
27 matches
Mail list logo
