On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:13 +1000, Webmaster wrote:
Are we not being a bit classist?
(Coming in a little late here, guys - sorry!)
Classist not to offer constructive help for a non-standards based
implementation? I don't think so, for two main reasons:
1. The list is the web standards group,
setiawan77th wrote:
I was learning on these CSS, to have my vertical menu.
It's work o IE6 and Mozzila.
But some how it look weird in IE5 and IE5.5
Can someone be so kind helping me to my problem?
http://embun.net
http://embun.net/style/style_black.css
Thanks
setiawan
Dunno Setiawan, but
I am trying to create a combined tree/table view using web standards.
If you don't know what a tree/table is take a look at the following example.
http://books.mozdev.org/screenshots/moz_0904.gif
Two parts to this question...
1) how should the content be structured?
2) how would the styling
The talk here is really dull, I agree Brian.
On 8/12/05, Brian Grimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This forum has unfortunately degraded from a useful resource in regards to
properly writing code for use by those with disabilities to just another
HTML help group...
If you need help with
Rowan Lewis
The talk here is really dull, I agree Brian.
Well folks, here's a crazy idea: let's start some good
discussions on the principles of web standards then.
We need a bit of a catalyst to get things started. Any hot
topics anybody's got at the moment?
Patrick
Hi Fred
I don't want to repost the information because it was a bit lengthy, but you
may want to visit this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg17305.html
I have put together a nested unordered list and use a series of classes on
the body and id attributes on the
I would really need an example of what this styles to understand
completely, but...
I don't *think* this addresses my specific problem.
What I want is for the attributes to line up in columns (as in a table).
(Sorry, that wasn't clear in the first post.)
On 8/12/05, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL
I may be missing something here, but this looks like a classic case where a
table could actually be more appropriate.
1. It looks like it is columns of content, so a data table could be
appropriate.
2. if you structure the entire thing with spans and style it with CSS, it
has no real meaning for
On 8/12/05, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be missing something here, but this looks like a classic case where a
table could actually be more appropriate.
Maybe, in fact I have been using a table.
The number of levels is indefinite (my application is a assembly
hierarchy) so...
chop/
I guess the basic problem then is that the tree with attributes is
both a table and a nested list.
In my application the tree represents a part assembly.
One of the attributes is mass.
The mass of the assembly includes the mass of each of its components.
The purpose of the tree/table
For our members in the Netherlands (though I'm sure most of you are aware
already)...
http://kurafire.net/log/archive/2005/08/07/happy-clog
Regards,
Peter Firminger
***
http://webboy.net/
info@webboy.net
+612 49983388
+614 12932269
Thanks for the replies. I actually took a step back, re-evaluated the
suggestions I got and came up with this test page which appears to work:
http://www.olpguitars.com/index2.asp
The top links all work and I retained the graphic designer's sliced image.
oh yeah...it VALIDATES!
Thanks Jeff.
12 matches
Mail list logo