It depends the kind of layout you have.
The best and the easiest way to have the 300px in ur bg image itself,
eahtever clor you want.
regards
-P
www.puneetsakhuja.com/new
Original Message:
-
From: Cole Kuryakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:18:17 +0800
To:
Hi Cole,
I think the problem is the repeat-y will fill the image vertically over the
entire contents no matter where you position it initially. You may try a
vertical 1px by 1000px (or taller than your page will ever be) image. And
use the following:
background:
Hi
#wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 770px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_tile.jpg) repeat-y 0
300px;
}
Should work, my suggestion is try it with a 770by2px image, I have had
weird
At 5/20/2007 10:18 PM, Cole Kuryakin wrote:
I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper div.
By the way, asking the browser to replicate a 1px-thick image will
occupy a lot more CPU cycles than if you dimension your image to be
fatter and replicate, for example,
Paul Novitski wrote:
Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose semantic
value when ids classes are added? I think of ids classes as being
semantically neutral or inert.
When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and
classes can add value is, in
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to
developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no bearing
on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and page
retrieval via search engines. To that end they are semantically neutral
--
Hi,
Or rather microformats give senatic value to certain classes for the use
of external programs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats
Normal CSS markup improves semantics by removing presentational dross.
On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:43 am, Mordechai Peller wrote:
Paul Novitski wrote:
Hi all,
Just encountered a problem where IE won't do anything if you add an
image inside your label, that is you can't click on the label to
activate the radio, checkbox etc.
I found this idea, which sounded good, but the Javascript conflicts
with another onclick event. Just wondering if anyone
Rob Kirton skrev:
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to
developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have no
bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end
users and page retrieval via search engines.
Take a look at this:
Thanks to all for weighing-in on this one and appreciate the side-notes on
1px tall vs. 2px or more tall tiling background images.
Unfortunate that we can't determine a vertical start-point for a tiling
image but I've learned something new.
Thanks again to everyone.
Cole
-Original
Anders
Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of this particular plugin; and as you
suggest, better again if this or something similar is supported as standard
in a wide range of user agents. Agent support of extended HTML is certainly
a far better means of adoption, than the approach of having to
Hi Cole,
I think the problem is the repeat-y will fill the image vertically over the
entire contents no matter where you position it initially. You may try a
vertical 1px by 1000px (or taller than your page will ever be) image. And
use the following:
background:
Or you could do the same but make the first 300px of the images
transparent - so you don't need to bother about positioning 300px down.
On Mon, May 21, 2007 4:16 pm, Kepler Gelotte wrote:
Hi Cole,
I think the problem is the repeat-y will fill the image vertically over
the
entire contents
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Before you use a table, check this link:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/make_an_html_list_look_like_a_table.asp
Ignore the script solution and look at the CSS rules in there.
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
Done that Thierry, thank you. Works fine!
Thanks for that :)
Lucien.
Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/05/07 9:24 AM
Tell that to this search engine:
http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/
On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote:
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value
Tell that to this search engine:
http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/
On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote:
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value
to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have
no bearing on real world semantics in
You could use the same argument to say that all markup in sematicly
neutral. That the B tag and STRONG tags have the same semantic weight
since end users, the consumers of the web, nerevr look at the markup and
are largely uninterested in how the content gets to be that way it is.
We could easily
Hi everyone
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration
other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media player, I would
really appreciate your feedback and/or assistance. I would particularly
But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this
mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The
users
will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to
them.
Actually with your example, I believe there are more users who would be
http://www.chriserwin.com/scripts/crir/
This is a script that does that. It's a good reference i guess.
Sam
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
Just encountered a problem where IE won't do anything if you add an
image inside your label, that is you can't click on the label to
activate the radio,
On 22 May 2007, at 02:31:29, Parker, Simi ((DPS)) wrote:
Hi everyone
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player
configuration other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows
Media player, I would really
Good point.
Thanks.
L.
Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/05/07 11:46 AM
But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this
mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The
users
will still see a nice bold heading. The
Hi all,
I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention our
site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts.
I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise
informed.
I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is
My vote generally goes in for tables. Use th cells appropriately and
there's a clear relationship there. Definition lists are semantically
on par, but often harder to implement/require effort to make them
*look like a table* (which is what people expect when filling out
forms, on paper or on the
Using the nbsp; for layout is the worst of the ideas and should not be
considered for the final form.
Tables, while frowned upon / argued over / etc, are still the most
reliable way to layout COMPLEX forms, for simple forms you don't need
tables at all. Do a search for accessible CSS form
My view:
Use HTML for content
Use CSS for presentation
Use tables only for tabular data
WCAG 1.0 has the following guidelines applicable to this question.
3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.
5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers.
5.3 Do not use tables for
26 matches
Mail list logo