RE: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
It depends the kind of layout you have.
The best and the easiest way to have the 300px in ur bg image itself,
eahtever clor you want.

regards
-P

www.puneetsakhuja.com/new




Original Message:
-
From: Cole Kuryakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:18:17 +0800
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Tiling image problem


Hello All -

I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper div.
Difference is that I need this repeat to START 300px from the top of the
wrapper.

So far, no luck. Here's the code:

#wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 770px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_tile.jpg) repeat-y 0
300px;
}

Reason I'm starting off at 300px from the top is because I need the top of
the wrapper to be transparent so the tiling body background can be seen
above and below the header, but the area behind the nav and content areas
NEED to be white.

So, is it possible to start a tile a certain distance from the top of a
containing div?

If so, can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

If you'd like to see this live, look here: http://teratest.terapad.com

Thanks to all in advance!

Cole




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi Cole,

I think the problem is the repeat-y will fill the image vertically over the
entire contents no matter where you position it initially. You may try a
vertical 1px by 1000px (or taller than your page will ever be) image. And
use the following:

background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_vertical_tile.jpg)
repeat-x 0 300px;

Regards,
Kepler Gelotte
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cole Kuryakin
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:18 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Tiling image problem

Hello All -

I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper div.
Difference is that I need this repeat to START 300px from the top of the
wrapper.

So far, no luck. Here's the code:

#wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 770px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_tile.jpg) repeat-y 0
300px;
}

Reason I'm starting off at 300px from the top is because I need the top of
the wrapper to be transparent so the tiling body background can be seen
above and below the header, but the area behind the nav and content areas
NEED to be white.

So, is it possible to start a tile a certain distance from the top of a
containing div?

If so, can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

If you'd like to see this live, look here: http://teratest.terapad.com

Thanks to all in advance!

Cole




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread Nick Cowie

Hi





#wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 770px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_tile.jpg) repeat-y 0
300px;
}

Should work, my suggestion is try it with a 770by2px image, I have had

weird problems with repeating 1px wide images in FF or Safari (can't
remember which one) I always used 2px wide images now.


--
Nick Cowie
http://nickcowie.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread Paul Novitski

At 5/20/2007 10:18 PM, Cole Kuryakin wrote:

I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper div.



By the way, asking the browser to replicate a 1px-thick image will 
occupy a lot more CPU cycles than if you dimension your image to be 
fatter and replicate, for example, one that's 50px or 100px 
thick.  In my experience the difference can be large enough to be 
perceptible by a human being, i.e. a significant fraction of a second 
or more for a large screen.  Generating a fatter background image can 
therefore be seen as pre-processing with significant savings in real time.


Regards,

Paul
__

Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Mordechai Peller

Paul Novitski wrote:
Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose semantic 
value when ids  classes are added?  I think of ids  classes as being 
semantically neutral or inert.
When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and 
classes can add value is, in part, the basis for microformats.) For 
example, id=nav-main, id=footer, class=price all add value. 
However, there's values in scarcity. When ids and classes are scarce 
there is an implied value which is imparted because this element has 
one and that element doesn't. With class=bullet1, class=bullet2, 
class=bullet3, etc., their value is somewhat diluted.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Rob Kirton

More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to
developers or to those who have to maintain the site.  They have no bearing
on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and page
retrieval via search engines.  To that end they are semantically neutral

--
Regards

- Rob

Raising web standards  : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Linking in with others: http://linkedin.com/in/robkirton

On 21/05/07, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Paul Novitski wrote:
 Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose semantic
 value when ids  classes are added?  I think of ids  classes as being
 semantically neutral or inert.
When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and
classes can add value is, in part, the basis for microformats.) For
example, id=nav-main, id=footer, class=price all add value.
However, there's values in scarcity. When ids and classes are scarce
there is an implied value which is imparted because this element has
one and that element doesn't. With class=bullet1, class=bullet2,
class=bullet3, etc., their value is somewhat diluted.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Stuart Foulstone
Hi,

Or rather microformats give senatic value to certain classes for the use
of external programs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformats

Normal CSS markup improves semantics by removing presentational dross.


On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:43 am, Mordechai Peller wrote:
 Paul Novitski wrote:
 Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose semantic
 value when ids  classes are added?  I think of ids  classes as being
 semantically neutral or inert.
 When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and
 classes can add value is, in part, the basis for microformats.) For
 example, id=nav-main, id=footer, class=price all add value.
 However, there's values in scarcity. When ids and classes are scarce
 there is an implied value which is imparted because this element has
 one and that element doesn't. With class=bullet1, class=bullet2,
 class=bullet3, etc., their value is somewhat diluted.


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB

Tel. 07751 413451


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Image in a label in IE

2007-05-21 Thread Paul Collins

Hi all,

Just encountered a problem where IE won't do anything if you add an
image inside your label, that is you can't click on the label to
activate the radio, checkbox etc.

I found this idea, which sounded good, but the Javascript conflicts
with another onclick event. Just wondering if anyone had found a CSS
solution since 2005 when this one was written?!

http://snook.ca/archives/javascript/using_images_as/#c

There is also this, but it doesn't seem to work in IE 5.0 for me.
http://riddle.pl/-/xhtml/css-img-in-label/fixed.html

Any ideas?!

Cheers
Paul


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Anders Nawroth


Rob Kirton skrev:
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to 
developers or to those who have to maintain the site.  They have no 
bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end 
users and page retrieval via search engines.


Take a look at this:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4106

It's the Operator Fx extension, which lets end users make use of 
microformats.


I think this or something similar will be a part of Fx 3. And IE 8, 
actually.



/AndersN


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread Cole Kuryakin
Thanks to all for weighing-in on this one and appreciate the side-notes on
1px tall vs. 2px or more tall tiling background images.

Unfortunate that we can't determine a vertical start-point for a tiling
image but I've learned something new.

Thanks again to everyone.

Cole

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Novitski
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 2:54 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Tiling image problem

At 5/20/2007 10:18 PM, Cole Kuryakin wrote:
I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper div.


By the way, asking the browser to replicate a 1px-thick image will 
occupy a lot more CPU cycles than if you dimension your image to be 
fatter and replicate, for example, one that's 50px or 100px 
thick.  In my experience the difference can be large enough to be 
perceptible by a human being, i.e. a significant fraction of a second 
or more for a large screen.  Generating a fatter background image can 
therefore be seen as pre-processing with significant savings in real time.

Regards,

Paul
__

Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com 



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Rob Kirton

Anders

Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of this particular plugin; and as you
suggest, better again if this or something similar is supported as standard
in a wide range of user agents.  Agent support of extended HTML is certainly
a far better means of adoption, than the approach of having to convert every
piece of HTML data on the web into RDF and then using a specialist browser
to assimilate and make sense of it :0)

Allowing users to benefit from embeded microformats is an excellent idea.

Unfortunately on a rather more mundane level - I still come across clients
who still have dificulties with the correct use of header and paragraph tags
(rgh!!).  We have a long way to go

--
Regards

- Rob

Raising web standards  : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Linking in with others: http://linkedin.com/in/robkirton

On 21/05/07, Anders Nawroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Rob Kirton skrev:
 More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to
 developers or to those who have to maintain the site.  They have no
 bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end
 users and page retrieval via search engines.

Take a look at this:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4106

It's the Operator Fx extension, which lets end users make use of
microformats.

I think this or something similar will be a part of Fx 3. And IE 8,
actually.


/AndersN


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

RE: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread Kepler Gelotte

Hi Cole,

I think the problem is the repeat-y will fill the image vertically over the
entire contents no matter where you position it initially. You may try a
vertical 1px by 1000px (or taller than your page will ever be) image. And
use the following:

background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_vertical_tile.jpg)
repeat-x 0 300px;

Regards,
Kepler Gelotte
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cole Kuryakin
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:18 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Tiling image problem

Hello All -

I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper div.
Difference is that I need this repeat to START 300px from the top of the
wrapper.

So far, no luck. Here's the code:

#wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 770px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
background:
url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_tile.jpg) repeat-y 0
300px;
}

Reason I'm starting off at 300px from the top is because I need the top of
the wrapper to be transparent so the tiling body background can be seen
above and below the header, but the area behind the nav and content areas
NEED to be white.

So, is it possible to start a tile a certain distance from the top of a
containing div?

If so, can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

If you'd like to see this live, look here: http://teratest.terapad.com

Thanks to all in advance!

Cole




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***attachment: winmail.dat

RE: [WSG] Tiling image problem

2007-05-21 Thread Stuart Foulstone

Or you could do the same but make the first 300px of the images
transparent - so you don't need to bother about positioning 300px down.


On Mon, May 21, 2007 4:16 pm, Kepler Gelotte wrote:

 Hi Cole,

 I think the problem is the repeat-y will fill the image vertically over
 the
 entire contents no matter where you position it initially. You may try a
 vertical 1px by 1000px (or taller than your page will ever be) image. And
 use the following:

   background:
 url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_vertical_tile.jpg)
 repeat-x 0 300px;

 Regards,
 Kepler Gelotte
 _
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Cole Kuryakin
 Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:18 AM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] Tiling image problem

 Hello All -

 I'm setting a 1px by 770px image to repeat vertically within a wrapper
 div.
 Difference is that I need this repeat to START 300px from the top of the
 wrapper.

 So far, no luck. Here's the code:

 #wrapper {
   position: relative;
   width: 770px;
   margin: 0 auto;
   text-align: left;
   background:
 url(/resources/5661/assets/images_medical/wrapper_tile.jpg) repeat-y 0
 300px;
 }

 Reason I'm starting off at 300px from the top is because I need the top of
 the wrapper to be transparent so the tiling body background can be seen
 above and below the header, but the area behind the nav and content areas
 NEED to be white.

 So, is it possible to start a tile a certain distance from the top of a
 containing div?

 If so, can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

 If you'd like to see this live, look here: http://teratest.terapad.com

 Thanks to all in advance!

 Cole




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


-- 
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB

Tel. 07751 413451


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] width of inline lists

2007-05-21 Thread Designer

Thierry Koblentz wrote:


Before you use a table, check this link:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/make_an_html_list_look_like_a_table.asp

Ignore the script solution and look at the CSS rules in there.

---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com



Done that Thierry, thank you. Works fine!  (Even in IE!)
--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Lucien Stals
Thanks for that :)

Lucien.


Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/05/07 9:24 AM 
Tell that to this search engine:
http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/

On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote:

 More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value  
 to developers or to those who have to maintain the site.  They have  
 no bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by  
 end users and page retrieval via search engines.  To that end they  
 are semantically neutral

 -- 
 Regards

 - Rob

 Raising web standards  : http://ele.vation.co.uk
 Linking in with others: http://linkedin.com/in/robkirton

 On 21/05/07, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul  
 Novitski wrote:
  Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose  
 semantic
  value when ids  classes are added?  I think of ids  classes as  
 being
  semantically neutral or inert.
 When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and
 classes can add value is, in part, the basis for microformats.) For
 example, id=nav-main, id=footer, class=price all add value.
 However, there's values in scarcity. When ids and classes are scarce
 there is an implied value which is imparted because this element has
 one and that element doesn't. With class=bullet1, class=bullet2,
 class=bullet3, etc., their value is somewhat diluted.


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use 
of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or protected 
by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, 
distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly prohibited. The University 
does not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are secure and there is 
also a risk that it may be corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility 
to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you 
have received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 
and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept liability in 
connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, 
unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Breton Slivka

Tell that to this search engine:
http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/

On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote:

More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value  
to developers or to those who have to maintain the site.  They have  
no bearing on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by  
end users and page retrieval via search engines.  To that end they  
are semantically neutral


--
Regards

- Rob

Raising web standards  : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Linking in with others: http://linkedin.com/in/robkirton

On 21/05/07, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul  
Novitski wrote:
 Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose  
semantic
 value when ids  classes are added?  I think of ids  classes as  
being

 semantically neutral or inert.
When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and
classes can add value is, in part, the basis for microformats.) For
example, id=nav-main, id=footer, class=price all add value.
However, there's values in scarcity. When ids and classes are scarce
there is an implied value which is imparted because this element has
one and that element doesn't. With class=bullet1, class=bullet2,
class=bullet3, etc., their value is somewhat diluted.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Lucien Stals
You could use the same argument to say that all markup in sematicly
neutral. That the B tag and STRONG tags have the same semantic weight
since end users, the consumers of the web, nerevr look at the markup and
are largely uninterested in how the content gets to be that way it is.

We could easily lose our way and wander into the land of pedantic
semiotic debate. And I'm not saying that couldn't be fun, although I
never did well at semiotics when I studied them as an undergrad :(.  As
developers, we are the *only* ones that the semantic web benefits (until
microformats take off, and there is some kind of client support, but
there is problems in that too.). The humble P tag is semantic in it's
own right. It dentoes relativley clearly that a block of text is a
paragraph. By adding a class or id to that P tag I *add* to it's
semantic meaning by clarifying that it is a certain kind of paragraph. A
specialist subset of the normal generic semantic, if you like.

What is *not* semantic, is if I use a P tag, give it a class called Q
and style it font-weight:bold and use it as a heading.

The class name Q is meaningless (no semantic value). 
By styling the P bold and making it a heading, you are subverting the
existing semantic by not using a H tag instead.

But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this
mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The users
will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to
them.

I'd love it if there was enough client support that semantics mattered
to more then just those of who care about the aestetics of the code. But
such support is just not wide spread enough. 

I spent a lot of time marking up our staff listing page with
microformant stuff and I'm proud of what I did. But I know that apart
from myself, and one or two other people who grock this stuff, this work
isn't going to be appreciated in any meaningful way for years to come.
Plugins like Tails and Operator are fantastic, but so far as I can see,
only of use to those of us goofing around with this stuff.

Lucien.

Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Rob Kirton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21/05/07 9:31 PM 
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value to
developers or to those who have to maintain the site.  They have no
bearing
on real world semantics in terms of benefit derived by end users and
page
retrieval via search engines.  To that end they are semantically neutral

-- 
Regards

- Rob

Raising web standards  : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Linking in with others: http://linkedin.com/in/robkirton

On 21/05/07, Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Paul Novitski wrote:
  Mordechai, please elaborate on this point: how does HTML lose
semantic
  value when ids  classes are added?  I think of ids  classes as
being
  semantically neutral or inert.
 When used properly, ids and classes add semantic value. (That ids and
 classes can add value is, in part, the basis for microformats.) For
 example, id=nav-main, id=footer, class=price all add value.
 However, there's values in scarcity. When ids and classes are scarce
 there is an implied value which is imparted because this element has
 one and that element doesn't. With class=bullet1, class=bullet2,
 class=bullet3, etc., their value is somewhat diluted.


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use 
of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or protected 
by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, 
distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly prohibited. The University 
does not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are secure and there is 
also a risk that it may be corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility 
to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you 
have received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 
and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept liability in 
connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, 
unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

[WSG] Site Check - Streaming Media

2007-05-21 Thread Parker, Simi (DPS)
Hi everyone
 
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration
other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media player, I would
really appreciate your feedback and/or assistance. I would particularly
welcome feedback from Macintosh and Linux users.
 
The live broadcasting service is streamed from:
http://webcast.aph.gov.au/livebroadcasting/  The House is sitting for
the next fortnight so there should be something for you to have a look
at.
 
I would like to know if you are able to see or not see the media being
streamed and the configuration of software you are using eg: Mac OX,
Safari and QuickTime.
 
Thanks
Simi Parker


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


RE: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Thierry Koblentz
 But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this
 mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The
 users
 will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to
 them.

Actually with your example, I believe there are more users who would be
bothered; screen-reader users for example who can navigate (cycle) through
headings. 
One can style a P element to look like a heading as much as he wants, but it
still won't become a proper hook for some UAs.

---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Image in a label in IE

2007-05-21 Thread Samuel Tan

http://www.chriserwin.com/scripts/crir/

This is a script that does that. It's a good reference i guess.

Sam

Paul Collins wrote:

Hi all,

Just encountered a problem where IE won't do anything if you add an
image inside your label, that is you can't click on the label to
activate the radio, checkbox etc.

I found this idea, which sounded good, but the Javascript conflicts
with another onclick event. Just wondering if anyone had found a CSS
solution since 2005 when this one was written?!

http://snook.ca/archives/javascript/using_images_as/#c

There is also this, but it doesn't seem to work in IE 5.0 for me.
http://riddle.pl/-/xhtml/css-img-in-label/fixed.html

Any ideas?!

Cheers
Paul


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site Check - Streaming Media

2007-05-21 Thread Nick Fitzsimons

On 22 May 2007, at 02:31:29, Parker, Simi ((DPS)) wrote:


Hi everyone

I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting  
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player  
configuration other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows  
Media player, I would really appreciate your feedback and/or  
assistance. I would particularly welcome feedback from Macintosh  
and Linux users.


The live broadcasting service is streamed from: http:// 
webcast.aph.gov.au/livebroadcasting/  The House is sitting for the  
next fortnight so there should be something for you to have a look at.


I would like to know if you are able to see or not see the media  
being streamed and the configuration of software you are using eg:  
Mac OX, Safari and QuickTime.


Hi Simi,

Am I right in believing that this content is being streamed in  
Microsoft's proprietary WMV format? (No, I'm not going to go off on a  
rant about using proprietary technologies for information that should  
be freely available to all - well, not this time :-)


Anyway, I'm using Mac OS X 10.4.9 (the latest version, fully updated)  
on an Intel MacBook, and I've installed Flip4Mac, as suggested on  
Microsoft's own site:
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/otherproducts/otherproducts.aspx? 
pid=windowsmedia


Flip4Mac has one major advantage over Microsoft's own Windows Media  
Player for Mac: it actually plays Windows Media content, which  
Windows Media Player for Mac has never managed to do so much as once,  
either on this machine or on my old-but-good PowerMac G4.


I've checked using Safari 2.0.4 (419.3) and Firefox 1.5.0.11, both  
with full popup blocking configured (the browser's own, not any  
extensions). Both of them successfully opened up the media window  
when I clicked the Accept button on the Conditions of Access  
page, initialised the Flip4Mac plugin, and played the content (which,  
being the proceedings of some standing committee or other, was  
unremittingly tedious :-)


Note that I haven't tested this on the PowerMac (non-Intel processor)  
- I reformatted that a while ago, and don't install fripperies like  
media players on it now as I use it as a development server. However,  
I seem to recall successfully using Flip4Mac there too some time in  
the past. Maybe others can give more detailed feedback on using it on  
PowerPC architectures.


So if you need to suggest options to Mac users for ways to view the  
content, you should probably recommend installing Flip4Mac - or maybe  
give them the Microsoft link above, as recommending specific software  
appears to be regarded with fear and loathing by governmental bodies  
fearful of lawsuits (although they don't appear to have the same  
worries over recommending dangerous rubbish like Microsoft's browser  
for Windows...)


Hope this helps,

Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] css type loop

2007-05-21 Thread Lucien Stals
Good point.

Thanks.

L.

Lucien Stals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 22/05/07 11:46 AM 
 But at the end of the day, this will only piss of the people on this
 mailing list, and the next developer to work on your web site. The
 users
 will still see a nice bold heading. The semantics are meanlingless to
 them.

Actually with your example, I believe there are more users who would be
bothered; screen-reader users for example who can navigate (cycle)
through
headings. 
One can style a P element to look like a heading as much as he wants,
but it
still won't become a proper hook for some UAs.

---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use 
of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or protected 
by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, 
distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly prohibited. The University 
does not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are secure and there is 
also a risk that it may be corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility 
to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you 
have received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 
and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept liability in 
connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, 
unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-21 Thread Benedict Wyss

Hi all,

I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention our
site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts.

I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise
informed.

I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is not that
good to look at with everything butting up against each other. His other
suggestion was to add nbsp's to move things about.

I like to use the definition list with Labels.

Now I know the dl I am using is not being used exactly as it was originally
used (good point), but I say it is 100 times better than tables.

Can I get a WSG response on the best format to layout a form.

Cheers,

Ben


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-21 Thread Joshua Street

My vote generally goes in for tables. Use th cells appropriately and
there's a clear relationship there. Definition lists are semantically
on par, but often harder to implement/require effort to make them
*look like a table* (which is what people expect when filling out
forms, on paper or on the web).

-josh

On 5/22/07, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi all,

I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention our
site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts.

I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise
informed.

I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is not that
good to look at with everything butting up against each other. His other
suggestion was to add nbsp's to move things about.

I like to use the definition list with Labels.

Now I know the dl I am using is not being used exactly as it was originally
used (good point), but I say it is 100 times better than tables.

Can I get a WSG response on the best format to layout a form.

Cheers,

Ben

***
List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



--
Joshua Street

http://josh.st/
+61 (0) 425 808 469


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-21 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor
Using the nbsp; for layout is the worst of the ideas and should not be 
considered for the final form.


Tables, while frowned upon / argued over / etc, are still the most 
reliable way to layout COMPLEX forms, for simple forms you don't need 
tables at all.  Do a search for accessible CSS form layouts.


The DL is an okay idea, but with the markup you'll end up adding, you're 
better off using this style structure:


form
fieldset
legendMy Legend/legend
div
labelMy Label/label
input type=my_input value=my text /
/div
/fieldset
/form

There's a ton of other ways to go about this too in regards to using/not 
using the div, nesting the input inside the label, etc.


*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design  Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



Benedict Wyss wrote:

Hi all,

I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention 
our site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts.


I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise 
informed.


I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is 
not that good to look at with everything butting up against each 
other. His other suggestion was to add nbsp's to move things 
about.


I like to use the definition list with Labels.

Now I know the dl I am using is not being used exactly as it was 
originally used (good point), but I say it is 100 times better than 
tables.


Can I get a WSG response on the best format to layout a form.

Cheers,

Ben

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/813 - Release Date: 5/20/2007 7:54 AM
  



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] dl v table for form layout

2007-05-21 Thread Kane Tapping
My view:

Use HTML for content
Use CSS for presentation
Use tables only for tabular data 

WCAG 1.0 has the following guidelines applicable to this question.

3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.
5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers.
5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when 
linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an 
alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version).
5.4 If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for 
the purpose of visual formatting.
5.5 Provide summaries for tables.
10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and 
form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, 
ensure that the label is properly positioned.
10.3 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render 
side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative (on the 
current page or some other) for all tables that lay out text in parallel, 
word-wrapped columns.
10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, 
place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas.
12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls.


 - Kane






Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22/05/2007 02:15 PM
Please respond to
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org


To
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
cc

Subject
[WSG] dl v table for form layout






Hi all,

I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention our 
site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts.

I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise 
informed. 

I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is not 
that good to look at with everything butting up against each other. His 
other suggestion was to add nbsp's to move things about. 

I like to use the definition list with Labels.

Now I know the dl I am using is not being used exactly as it was 
originally used (good point), but I say it is 100 times better than 
tables.

Can I get a WSG response on the best format to layout a form. 

Cheers,

Ben

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***