[WSG] Auto-Re: WSG Digest

2010-06-03 Thread rongqing . jiang
Receipt confirmation! I will deal with your email ASAP. 邮件收到,我将尽快处理! *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help:

[WSG] Yes/No structure?

2010-06-03 Thread nedlud
I have a web form I'm building and there is a simple yes/no question in it. I got to wondering what the best semantic mark up for this is? Does anyone have any good UI/UX suggestions? My three ideas were... Two radio buttons for yes and no... pDo you...?/p label for=ans-yesYes/labelinput

Re: [WSG] Yes/No structure?

2010-06-03 Thread John Unsworth
Hi Lucien, The first thing that occurs to me regarding the semantics of the action is what is the Yes/No proposition in regards to, and that this might provide a clearer notion as to what to do. By this what I mean is, in the first instance so far as semantic mark up is concerned it would appear

Re: [WSG] Yes/No structure?

2010-06-03 Thread nedlud
Hmm. I hadn't considered the wording of the actual question to be so important. But I can sure see your point. The full questions in the form is Do you require an interpreter? This is followed by: If so, what language? I am porting a paper based for onto the web, and the paper based version has

Re: [WSG] Yes/No structure?

2010-06-03 Thread Gregorio Hernández Caso
Hi Lucien, In my opinion, this is the best structure for yes/no options: pDo you...?/p labelinput type=radio name=ans value=yes Yes/label labelinput type=radio name=ans value=no No/label Cheers, Greg On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:41 PM, nedlud ned...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm. I hadn't considered

Re: [WSG] Yes/No structure?

2010-06-03 Thread John Unsworth
Lucien, Interestingly the Robert Hoekman Jr example I cited started originally as a paper form. In his write up when the form was first put up online before he came along it ran to page after page, resulting in people never completing it! In your example the first thing that strikes me, but this