[WSG] Preventing scrolling

2005-06-21 Thread Tatham Oddie
Hi everyone, I currently have a problem something like this: div { width: 200px; height: 100%; overflow: hidden; } div Lots and lots of content which we never expect to fit in the box

[WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick Fitzgerald
http://www.browsercam.com/ - that really handy site that allow you to preview screenshots of your webpage on all browser/platform combinations.

Re: [WSG] Preventing scrolling

2005-06-21 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On 21 Jun 2005, at 3:04 pm, Tatham Oddie wrote: div { width: 200px; height: 100%; overflow: hidden; } height:100% - 100% of what ? if the parent container has no height declared, the 100% will default to auto, and all the

Re: [WSG] Preventing scrolling

2005-06-21 Thread Roberto Gorjão
I used once another div, with the same position and size, a greater z-index, no content and a background-color set to transparent. Roberto - Tatham Oddie wrote: Hi everyone, I currently have a problem something like this: div {

Re: [WSG] Styling forms inside a horizontal navigation bar

2005-06-21 Thread Terrence Wood
I haven't got access to IE/PC right now, but removing the floats and using display:inline worked for me in FF and Safari. change these two rules: #navbar ul { list-style-type: none; display:inline; } #navbar form { display:inline; margin-left: 6px; } On 21 Jun

RE: [WSG] Preventing scrolling

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick Lauke
Tatham Oddie Lots and lots of content which we never expect to fit in the box and we just want to be cut off. However, we only want them to be able to see what ould fit in the box. So, we need to stop them from being able to click in the box and use their scroll wheel. Another way they

RE: [WSG] Class Discusion: Centering a Fixed Width Layout

2005-06-21 Thread Mike Foskett
Hi Mario, That only occurs with IE v5. IE v5.5, v6, Firefox, Netscape and Opera will all centre the design. The only amend required to get IE v5 to behave is to add text-align:center to the body element. Then compensate for that alignment in the elements below: * {margin:0; padding:0} html

[WSG] Hiding styles from IE5?

2005-06-21 Thread Roberto Gorjão
Hello all, I would like to hide the styles of a site from I.E.5, so its pages degrade gracefully (who ever invented this expression had a twisted sense of humor) in this browser… I have a general styles sheet linked to my pages, and I created another styles sheet, just for I.E.5, which I’ve

[WSG] Strange font-family behavior on Mac

2005-06-21 Thread Marcello Cerruti
I have the same strange problem that you can see on this Apple site page: http://guide.apple.com/index.lasso If you look at the left side column with IE (Mac) or Firefox (Mac) the font is different from the one that you can see on Safari, iCab, OmniWeb, Opera, and on all the Windows

[WSG] HTML-Structure feedback - powerplay.solutionpark.ch

2005-06-21 Thread Michael Vogt
Hello everybody. I'm preparing right now some pages for a new client. I'd be glad to receive some feedback about the code-structure of two of them. The nested divs for the columns are coming from a template builder somewhere on the net, and I'm using them since. Don't know if they are all needed

RE: [WSG] Preventing scrolling

2005-06-21 Thread Tatham Oddie
Philippe, This is within a container which has top:200px;bottom:150px; (or so)... Thanks, Tatham Oddie Technical Director, Fuel Advance www.fueladvance.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philippe Wittenbergh Sent: Tuesday, 21 June

[WSG] off topic - wordpress global problems

2005-06-21 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Hi All Sorry about this off-topic post but I figure there are plenty of people on this list that may be affected. I noticed this morning as I checked the blogs that I read regularly that several are down due to database issues. www.molly.com, photomatt, joe clark, 1976design.com, etc. My blog

Re: [WSG] Hiding styles from IE5?

2005-06-21 Thread Stefan Lemmen
Hi Roberto, On 6/21/05, Roberto Gorjão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I would like to hide the styles of a site from I.E.5, so its pages degrade gracefully (who ever invented this expression had a twisted sense of humor) in this browser… I have a general styles sheet linked to my

Re: [WSG] Hiding styles from IE5?

2005-06-21 Thread Jan Brasna
See http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/ -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints

Re: [WSG] Hiding styles from IE5?

2005-06-21 Thread Roberto Gorjão
Hi Stefan, An interesting article. Thank you. Roberto -- Stefan Lemmen wrote: Hi Roberto, On 6/21/05, Roberto Gorjão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I would like to hide the styles of a site from I.E.5, so its pages degrade gracefully (who ever invented this

RE: [WSG] Class Discusion: Centering a Fixed Width Layout

2005-06-21 Thread standards
Good morning Mike, I must respectfully disagree. I'm looking at my client site in FF, Opera, Mozilla and Netscape as I compose this reply, and the page is left-aligned using margin:0 auto in the body rule only. However, it center-aligns the page when placing the margin:0 auto in a container div.

RE: [WSG] Class Discusion: Centering a Fixed Width Layout

2005-06-21 Thread Mike Foskett
Hi Mario, I don't know what's different, but here's the test page I used to develop it: http://www.websemantics.co.uk/test/centered_content/ Tested as working on: PC: IE v5, IE v6, Firefox. Mac: IE v5.2, Safari. The test example has no margin set on the container div. Though I don't really

Re: [WSG] Preventing scrolling

2005-06-21 Thread Roberto Gorjão
Hi Tatham, Width the necessary adaptations, I think this does the trick: div style= position:absolute; left:100px; top:100px; width: 200px; height: 200px; overflow:hidden; border: 1px solid black a href=#Link to the article/a pLots and lots of text. Lots and lots of text./p div

Re: [WSG] Hiding styles from IE5?

2005-06-21 Thread Roberto Gorjão
Thanks Jan, Great link! Roberto --- Jan Brasna wrote: See http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for

[WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Erica Jean
Hi there guys, I'm new :) My name is Erica and I'm a 21 year old graphic design student (only 2 more years to go! Yay!) I have a question though, and it's something that I've really been trying to put a lot of thought into. When building sites using the web standards, the stone-age

RE: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Drake, Ted C.
There are people using netscape 4. They tend to be stuck in government areas that do not allow people to update their computers or those using old programs that require this browser. It's easy to satisfy their need for content and everyone else's desire for pretty pages. Simply link to a

RE: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Erica Jean
Ah. Alright. Thank you for the clarification, andthank you forletting me know that Netscape 4 supports stylesheets at all. I didn't realize that there wasany stylesheet support for NS and IE4. Is there somewhere I could download older browsers for testing by chance? ---Original

Re: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread greg
Hi Erica-- I'm new to the whole Web design thing, but to answer your question, I would say No. Granted that's just my opinion, but the way I see it, time marches on and so does the Web. regards, g. On Tue Jun 21 13:18 , 'Erica Jean' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: Hi there guys,

RE: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread jason
http://browsers.evolt.org/ /ironic //posted using Netscape 4 webmail. Ah. Alright. Thank you for the clarification, and thank you for letting me know that Netscape 4 supports stylesheets at all. I didn't realize that there was any stylesheet support for NS and IE 4. Is there somewhere I

Re: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Brian Cummiskey
Erica Jean wrote: Is there somewhere I could download older browsers for testing by chance? http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=msie http://wp.netscape.com/download/archive/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Re: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Erica Jean
Thanks to both of you for the links :) I really appreciate it ^^ ---Original Message--- From: Brian Cummiskey Date: 06/21/05 15:31:52 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Hi there! Erica Jean wrote: Is there somewhere I could download older browsers for testing

Re: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Maarten Stolte
Hi, also note that when using XHTML, say with help from Designing with Webstandards from Jeffrey Zeldman, you can make a site that looks great in newer browsers, and also works in older browsers... Maarten Erica Jean wrote: Thanks to both of you for

RE: [WSG] accesability and backwards compatibility - WAS [Hi there!]

2005-06-21 Thread wayne
Hi I am having a similar problem with a site I am developing. I have tried to make it XHTML and CSS compliant. The problem I am having other than minor discrepancies between browsers is that in Safari and IE on OSX 9.0 and maybe even some others, the whole layout goes skew-whiff.

Re: Re: [WSG] Hi there!

2005-06-21 Thread Jeff
I would check your web logs to answer this question. Using a program such as Web Trends to generate reports, you can then tell where your traffic is coming from and what your web site visitors are using browser wise. Jeff From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2005/06/21 Tue PM 03:07:41 EDT To:

Re: [WSG] accesability and backwards compatibility - WAS [Hi there!]

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
wayne wrote: It’s for a design agency who is now saying that this is a requirement; And that's the crux of the argument: if the project documentation clearly states that the site must work and look same/similar even in older browsers, then that's what you've got to deliver. I always make a

RE: [WSG] accesability and backwards compatibility - WAS [Hi ther e!]

2005-06-21 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Hi Patrick Thanks for a thoughtful reply. It's easy to get lost in the arguments of whether or not to support an outdated browser and forget that sometimes our obligations are more personal. It's important to remember what you promised the client. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [WSG] Strange font-family behavior on Mac

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Marcello Cerruti wrote: I have the same strange problem that you can see on this Apple site page: http://guide.apple.com/index.lasso If you look at the left side column with IE (Mac) or Firefox (Mac) the font is different from the one that you can see on Safari, iCab, OmniWeb, Opera, and on

RE: [WSG] accesability and backwards compatibility - WAS [Hi ther e!]

2005-06-21 Thread wayne
Hi Patrick Thanks for such an insightful reply. I have looked at the spec and as I thought, we agreed on IE (5.5/6.0) and FF on Mac and Windows. I guess I am going to have to write an email explaining my position. Cheers W -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[WSG] Reminder: Auckland Geeks

2005-06-21 Thread Darren Wood
Just a reminder to all the Aucklanders in da house - tonight is the informal WSG get together at the The Belgian Beer Café in Takapuna ( 136 Hurstmere Road) from around 7pm. Looking forward to meeting some other local web standards geeks! Yay. Darren

Re: [WSG] Strange font-family behavior on Mac

2005-06-21 Thread Nick Gleitzman
On 21 Jun 2005, at 9:43 PM, Marcello Cerruti wrote: I have the same strange problem that you can see on this Apple site page: http://guide.apple.com/index.lasso If you look at the left side column with IE (Mac) or Firefox (Mac) the font is different from the one that you can see on Safari,

Re: [WSG] Strange font-family behavior on Mac

2005-06-21 Thread Kevin Futter
On 22/6/05 6:52 AM, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcello Cerruti wrote: I have the same strange problem that you can see on this Apple site page: http://guide.apple.com/index.lasso If you look at the left side column with IE (Mac) or Firefox (Mac) the font is different from

Re: [WSG] Strange font-family behavior on Mac

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Kevin Futter wrote: As far as I'm aware font smoothing is handled by the OS in OS X, and apps are hands-off in this regard. Apps still need to be coded specifically to take tap straight into OS X's improved Quartz rendering, as far as I know. -- Patrick H. Lauke

[WSG] Proper use of nbsp;

2005-06-21 Thread Cole Kuryakin - x7m
I tend to use nbsp; alot when it comes to seperating horizontal menu items with a pike "|". while this gives me what I want visually,I've always been sort of intuitively uncomfortable with this technique for some reason. Here's what I tend to do: ul id="topNav"lia href="" title="James

[WSG] font-size =1em (in the body) vs. font-size = 101%

2005-06-21 Thread Cole Kuryakin - x7m
I've just gotten comfortable using ems for font sizing in my projects by starting out with font-size=1em within the body tag. Now I'm seeing that some people are using font-size = 101% in the body tag. I seem to remember someone saying that using "1em" in the body tag makes some versions of

Re: [WSG] Proper use of nbsp;

2005-06-21 Thread tee
I have the same dilemma and always feel uncomfortable about it. Yesterday I accidentally 'discover' that by adding few pixel of padding in the .li or .li a does the trick. tee I tend to use nbsp; alot when it comes to seperating horizontal menu items with a pike |. while this gives me what I

Re: [WSG] Proper use of nbsp;

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Cole Kuryakin - x7m wrote: Here's what I tend to do: ul id=topNav lia href=/latest/ title=James Danielikrsquo;s latest works. accesskey=1Latest Works/anbsp;|nbsp;/li lia href=read/ title=Download a chapter from The Raven and The Hawk. accesskey=2Read A Chapter/anbsp;|nbsp;/li lia

Re: [WSG] Proper use of nbsp;

2005-06-21 Thread Glenn
Cole Kuryakin - x7m wrote: I tend to use nbsp; alot when it comes to seperating horizontal menu items with a pike |. while this gives me what I want visually, I've always been sort of intuitively uncomfortable with this technique for some reason. Here's what I tend to do: ul id=topNav

Re: [WSG] font-size =1em (in the body) vs. font-size = 101%

2005-06-21 Thread Darren Wood
personally I always use the default font sized provided by css...if I need it bigger then I use em values. here's an example: body { font: small Arial, sans-serif; } p { 1em; } h1 {2em; } h2 {1.8em; } etc... That way you know that the font will _always_ be readable. Even if you start off

RE: [WSG] Proper use of nbsp;

2005-06-21 Thread Gledhill, Scott
-Original Message- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2005 11:26 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Proper use of nbsp; Cole Kuryakin - x7m wrote: Here's what I tend to do: ul id=topNav lia href=/latest/ title=James

Re: [WSG] font-size =1em (in the body) vs. font-size = 101%

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Cole Kuryakin - x7m wrote: So, what's the deal? is it better/safer to user 101% vs 1em to set the initial font sizing for maximum cross browser compatiblility, or is this just a matter of style and preference? Two things: * IE has a problem resizing font sizes properly if the topmost size

Re: [WSG] Proper use of nbsp;

2005-06-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Gledhill, Scott wrote: I also agree not to use nbsp; | nbsp; but find it much easier to control look and feel if you make a small image of the divider Yup, also a valid method of course. One thing to keep in mind: using an image won't resize the divider if the font size is changed, while a

[WSG] weird behaviour in opera and IE...sometimes

2005-06-21 Thread Darren Wood
Kia Ora, I've just relaunched my website and it was all going quite well until i tried to look at it in Opera (8.0.2). it displays the home page perfectly, but the moment I click on any link it tries to download the page as application/octec-stream...what the?! Does this have something to do

Re: [WSG] Strange font-family behavior on Mac

2005-06-21 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On 22 Jun 2005, at 8:58 am, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Apps still need to be coded specifically to take tap straight into OS X's improved Quartz rendering, as far as I know. IE Mac 5.23 was a release to update the hooks to use the OS level rendering/smoothing. It doesn't do as good a job as

Re: [WSG] accesability and backwards compatibility - WAS [Hi there!]

2005-06-21 Thread heretic
requirement; I have said that if they want an accessible site written in CSS they can't have it looking exactly the same in older browsers that don't support CSS 2.0 unless I use 'old skool' presentation techniques. Has anyone else run into this problem? I suspect there are plenty of people,

Re: [WSG] weird behaviour in opera and IE...sometimes

2005-06-21 Thread Darren Wood
Hi again, Live Headers came to the rescue. Turns out my wordpress install wasn't setting the get_option('html_type') var. So when wordpress was building the header information is was passing NULL as the mime typenot optimum. I just hard coded my desired content type in wp-blog-header.php

[WSG] detecting css display properties

2005-06-21 Thread Steven . Faulkner
I have been trying to detect ,using javascript , the css display property (set via an external @import style sheet) of an element Example page: http://www.jimthatcher.com/site_resources.htm has a LI (class=skip with CSS display:none. but when i try to find this via the (IE DOM) i cannot locate