I think the future of CSS is not in hack or in conditional comments but
in using standard CSS. At the current time this isn't really possible
because of Internet Explorer, but from what I've heard about IE7 they
plan to do a fair amount of fixing up. Things won't be perfect and
support for nice stu
IIRC, position:fixed will do that for you, i.e.
#footer{
position:fixed;
bottom:0; right:0; left:0; height: 2em;
}
would create a 2em footer at the bottom of every page; however I don't
know how well this is supported. Internet Explorer certainly doesn't
support it.
Krassy wrote:
> Hi ev
If at all possible don't use class names that describe the way something
looks, but more what the thing actually is. I find that using names that
discribe the style of something will almost always come back to bite
you. And depending on how large you project is, it can bite pretty hard.
I was work
Alan Trick wrote:
It is possible to get ASP.NET to give you compliant code.
Therein lies the rub in my opinion. Isn't the tool supposed to make
your task easier? Who do you want in control, the designer/coder or the
IDE? Would you in fact tolerate that level of fiddling with a hammer i
Actually, Tatham was kind of right in a way. It is possible to get
ASP.NET to give you compliant code. However, compliance and web
standards are *not* the same thing. Compliance is only part of web
standards (and one of the smallest IMHO).
Take for example the Internet explorer blog on msdn.com
I have run into a problem with IE6 (surprise!) when floating a to the
right of content that is not contained in a tag. On the first line of
the content, there is a 10 pixel indent that isn't meant to be there. The
code works fine in Firefox.
Example code:
Caption goes here
Som
James Ellis wrote:
> Conditional statements in HTML such as those used by IE/Windows are a
> slippery slope and they seriously break a central tenet of
> programming. They are contained with and
> comments in code are not meant to be parsed as code. It's just plain
> badness.
I don't follow you h
adam reitsma wrote:
A real stumbling block for me is font sizes. I dread the time i want
to re-use a particular style, only to realise that the way i've
nested the tags makes my text 2px high...
http://www.bcct.org.au/v2
Maybe you shouldn't size down so many times through nesting then.
Note
James Ellis wrote:
comments in code are
not meant to be parsed as code.
...
> What happens if
someone adds a comment that happens to be parsed by some piece of
software? the software then goes on and does some unexpected things.
Then the software is broken, i.e. it does not adhere to spec. A
Just stay on this mailing-list and you'll hear *plenty* of points of
view's :)
p.s. It's good netiquite when your sending emails to a mailing list, to
use text-only (no html nastyness). In Mozilla Thunderbird you can set
this by going to Tools > Options > Coposition > 'Send and HTML options'
- Sen
Hi
Conditional statements in HTML such as those used by IE/Windows are a
slippery slope and they seriously break a central tenet of programming.
They are contained with and comments in
code are not meant to be parsed as code. It's just plain badness. What
happens if someone adds a comment that h
Hi peoples,
I've just created two draft pages for a site i'm working on. Whilst
I've spent years in HTML, and am relatively comfortable with the whole
Web Standards ideology, this is my first opportunity to build a site
from scratch.
Yes, it's valid xhtml, and yes,
it renders well in the browsers
The whole idea that a float *even can* be sematically incorrect is
absurd. Floating is simply a style, the way something is positioned and
it has no implyed semantic meaning whatsoever.
That said, it's an honour to know that were popular enough to warrant
trolls ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
> I think the future of CSS is not in hacks but looking seriously into
> using the conditional comments. I'm saying this as someone that is
> trying to figure out the best approach for retrofitting older
> conversions.
I rely heavily on Conditional Comments.
IMO, the easiest
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> Terrence Wood wrote:
>
>
>>Constants and variables are not going to part of CSS any time soon, so you
>>will need some kind of server side solution ...
>>
>>AFAIK they all use seom form of regex to do the replacement
>
>
> Well, no -- I frequently use variables in styl
On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Anders Nawroth wrote:
Conditional comments are IE statements that say if ie6 use this
additional CSS file, if IE5Mac, use this style sheet, if neither:
ignore this statement.
Conditional comments are Windows-only, unfortunately.
Conditional comments are va
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to get repeated footers to print using
XHTML/CSS? I asked this question on the CSS-discuss
mailing list, but got no response.
I've done some research[*] and experimentation, but
haven't been able to get a footer to print
bottom-aligned on every page.
[*]
http://www.al
Hi Anders
That's the beauty of them.
We're sending a special style sheet to IE and the rest are ignoring it.
And we can define which version of IE uses the style sheet.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anders Nawroth
Sent: Thursday, Se
Drake, Ted C. skrev:
I think the future of CSS is not in hacks but looking seriously into
using the conditional comments. I’m saying this as someone that is
trying to figure out the best approach for retrofitting older conversions.
Conditional comments are IE statements that say if ie6 use t
Irina wrote:
I've found this to be an interesting idea and wondering what other
members think about it:
"When bugs become patterns - A look at CSS Hacks":
http://spaces.msn.com/members/siteexperts/Blog/cns!
1pNcL8JwTfkkjv4gg6LkVCpw!1805.entry
The idea is not new, the logic has a lot of me
On 9/29/05, Irina Ahrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found this to be an interesting idea and wondering what other members
> think about it:
>
> "When bugs become patterns - A look at CSS Hacks":
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/siteexperts/Blog/cns!1pNcL8JwTfkkjv4gg6LkVCpw!1805.entr
I think the future of CSS is not in hacks
but looking seriously into using the conditional comments. I’m saying
this as someone that is trying to figure out the best approach for retrofitting
older conversions.
Conditional comments are IE statements
that say if ie6 use this additional C
Hi,
I've found this to be an interesting idea and wondering what other members think about it:
"When bugs become patterns - A look at CSS Hacks":
http://spaces.msn.com/members/siteexperts/Blog/cns!1pNcL8JwTfkkjv4gg6LkVCpw!1805.entry#comment
Cheers, Irina.
As long as I know, you shouldnt serve XHTML 1.1 as "text/html". You
should serve it as text/xml, or application/xhtml+xml
I read it may be... dangerous!
But, of course, I dont really understand what I'm talking about I'm
just repeating what I have read on several sites.
Julián
Christian M
James,
Read this:
http://www.westciv.com/courses/free/week_05/managing_files.html
and Tantek's presentation today at WE05, especially "meaningful class names" part
http://tantek.com/presentations/2005/09/elements-of-xhtml/
Cheers, Irina.
On 9/30/05, Nick Gleitzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James
James Oppenheim wrote:
I tend to use underscore for class and id, try very much to stay away
from two word file names.
This is a question (discussion?) that comes up every couple of months
here on the list - ultimately, I reckon you'll get as many
'conventions' in use as you've offered sugge
Whilst it won't affect accessibility or usability for the end user
(afaik) the class and id names should have semantic meaning indicating
there logical function - rather than id="rightColumn" you might use
id="localNavColumn" if the function of the column was to contain local
nav. This means if
I've found a 'bodge' using the faux column thing. Repeated a "wrapper"
background image for the body and it covers a multitude of sins!On 9/28/05, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed one other thing worth mentioning on the charismalab site.Your container div with the background
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a set of naming conventions for css classes and ids?
Should they have semantic meaning? I.E. address rather than bottom.
How should you go about naming the right column div.
What about for file names.
naming_conventions.html
naming-conventions.html
n
Hi everyone
http://www.meetup.developer.graphyx.net/blacksmith/test/index.html
This is my first attempt at creating a fully tableless design, using CSS
for layout, and ems. The client does not want a fluid layout, and
doesn't care too much about accessibility.
I have validated the code and css,
30 matches
Mail list logo