Lea de Groot wrote:
On 10/12/2005, at 1:53 PM, Brian Cummiskey wrote:
I wonder how many visits google gets in a day...
Probably in the billions - plenty of people have it as their homepage.
Of course, there'd be a lot of caching happening...
Lea
On 10/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/9/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/2005, at 1:20 AM, matt andrews wrote:
Hi Lea, I completely agree. Google have somehow developed a blind
spot when it comes to meeting even the basics of current web
On 12/10/05, matt andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt's example has more text, which explains the difference... and
imagine if the CSS and JS were in an external file... how often do
people reuse Google throughout the day? If all
Don't you just love W3C recommendations?
Google is stuck farther into the dark ages than we all thought... I
just realized Google's logo is a GIF image, and you know what that
means...
so I downloaded it, opened it with the GIMP, and saved it as a PNG
with the highest compression.
The GIF: 8.35
...
Updated valid page, based on the above:
http://xomerang.com/testpages/google/validGoogle.html (1,953 bytes)
Ok I took your version and got it to extreme:
http://rimantas.com/bits/google/google1.html (1729 bytes).
What I did: got rid of some optional tags, shortened name of CSS file
to
I feel you are forgetting a number of things.
- Response times:
Response times are every bit as important to Google as bandwidth usage
is. A user should never have to wait for the Google page, or the
Google search results. Ever.
CSS and JavaScript in separate files means the browser needs two
On 12/10/05, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel you are forgetting a number of things.
- Response times:
- Hidden bandwidth consumption:
- Obvious bandwidth consumption:
See Rimantas' version... I think you are focusing too much on the
specific implementation of standards, and not the
On 10/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See Rimantas' version... I think you are focusing too much on the
specific implementation of standards, and not the simple fact that if
Google used standards, they would save a lot. At least Rimantas
thought ahead and solved these
On 12/10/05, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Dynamic elements:
Things such as being logged in/not logged in, having Google Desktop or
not, sponsored links, search listings etc. all need be take in
consideration.
How? What does that have to do with it?
Consider the entire
...
I'm wondering what led MSN to go with external files, and Yahoo with
CSS in the header. MSN is obviously much more optomized than Yahoo
(the yahoo markup is a mess), and I'm thinking MSN might have picked
the right choice. Their CSS file is massive and probably covers all
the internal
liorean wrote:
Consider the entire www.google.com site. Or at least the search part
of it. You probably want to create one stylesheet file and one
javascript file for the entire thing, probably sent compressed if
client supports it, so it gets cached and not requested again in that
browser
Hello World,
I wish to make a horizontal unordered list, in which each li has a
background image. I am having trouble getting the image to display
properly, and I was wondering if you guys could lend a hand.
Below is the html and css I used for the unordered list. I have no
idea if it is valid
On 12/10/05, Nathan Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello World,
I wish to make a horizontal unordered list, in which each li has a
background image. I am having trouble getting the image to display
properly, and I was wondering if you guys could lend a hand.
Below is the html and css I
On 8 Dec 2005, at 8:17 PM, Joshua Street wrote:
input name=navn value= type=text
You're using the name attribute, which isn't valid
the name attribute *is* valid for form controls, but not other elements
in XHTML strict.
kind regards
Terrence Wood
Ah, my bad. I'd seen it misused/causing validation errors in the past,
so assumed that it was just not to be used at all.
Josh
On 12/11/05, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Dec 2005, at 8:17 PM, Joshua Street wrote:
input name=navn value= type=text
You're using the name
Right. I set up a page with what I am after, and implement all your
suggestions as they come in. Starting with yours.
http://www.chiefcodemonkey.com/awbn2/
There is the address.
I made the changes you stated. It now throws the allignmenat all out
of whack. Can I assume that you were expecting
16 matches
Mail list logo
