I like your test page. I find it quite useful. I've bookmarked it to share
it with some friends.
Eileen Russell
http://www.bytedreams.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:05 PM
To: wsg
On 2/24/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
your prob right but what about that flash as a css background someone wasposting about here a while back??this sounds interesting if it is possible. i was just working on something where this would have been useful, but i wasn't on the list when i
Felix Miata wrote:
Speaking of sizing things in px, particularly line lengths, when
discussing fluid layouts, makes no sense to me. I find an 800px line
length perfectly fine, and a 500px line length rather short, when I'm
using a 28px default. Line lengths are better set relative to text
size:
On 06/02/24 16:04 Gunlaug Sørtun apparently typed:
Personal preference: I don't think text-lines should be wider than 600 -
800px on any monitor, as long lines are generally harder to follow and
read than somewhat width-limited ones. Max-width might work for you.
Speaking of sizing things in p
Adam Morris wrote:
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish
Observation:
Fine, 840 - 3800.
...looks like any other fixed-width pages around.
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish/index1.html
Observation:
Main column drops below 1000px.
OK (more or less), 1024 - 1600.
Background-problems (b
http://www.designbyatfb.com/test/swftest2.html
Don't wuite understand what you are asking, but lol, asked several questions
recently myself about valid swf files and why one worked in IE and not in
FF. Here is my test page with several examples.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hei
Sean,
Friday, February 24, 2006, 8:08:57 PM, you wrote:
SJ> scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed
SJ> flash using CSS.
I really doubt that it is possible to embed flash by CSS. All these
methods use the (X)HTML object tag. And this is mandatory to embed
flas
Title: Re: [WSG] Fluid layout
On 2/24/06 2:18 PM, "Adam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it's not quite there yet.
Or try a look at 800 wide...
Sorry, no time to peek at it. Just an FYI...
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Good deal Sean, Jesse, et al.On 2/24/06, Sean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi i'm not a hundred percent sure on this but there's a website which may beof use:http://www.dezwozhere.com/links.htmlscroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed
flash using CSS.hope this
Hi everyone!Been trying to make this site I'm building fluid after seeing it on a huge monitor in my local Mac store and marvelling at how teeny weeny it looked!The site is at
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwishMy attempts at getting fluid is this:http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish/index
Hi i'm not a hundred percent sure on this but there's a website which may be
of use:
http://www.dezwozhere.com/links.html
scroll down to the section on embed multimedia, it has info on how to embed
flash using CSS.
hope this helps
_
If you werent worried about users without JavaScript enabled you could
use this http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/, alternatively have a fixed
size for IE.
Daz
On 24/02/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I'm working on getting a site launched - http://mcdowell.site
Thank you Project VII! I could of sworn I had looked at that...
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Heiden wrote:
Joseph,
Friday, February 24, 2006, 5:06:39 PM, you wrote:
JRBT> I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842
I don't know, ignorance I could claim. Was unaware that this site or list
even existed until doing a wee bit on investigating.
I'm so glad I happened across you'all (Texas talk) however. Smile
I belong to another forum with some great folks who have helped me
tremendously in the past year to g
Joseph,
Friday, February 24, 2006, 5:06:39 PM, you wrote:
JRBT> I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set
JRBT> to 95%. That way it doesn't squish up (in small resolutions) too much
JRBT> and force floats downward.
You can try the javascript-solution that Al Sparber
Greetings all,
I'm working on getting a site launched - http://mcdowell.sitesbyjoe.com
- and was hoping to make it completely fluid in all directions.
One problem, IE (surprise!)
I have a min-width applied to my wrapper div of 842px, and a width set
to 95%. That way it doesn't squish up
you're right of course. I should use an OL and put the breadcrumb
text as a heading. However I found this method to be the most
compliant and easiest to implement, and it is understandable in most
browsers.
On 23 Feb 2006, at 20:55, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Stephen Stagg wrote:
For the
Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom
from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case.
Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a
site or am i barking up the wrong tree?
Jesse said
You can't embed Flash using CSS,
yo
> Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom
> from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case.
> Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a
> site or am i barking up the wrong tree?
You can't embed Flash using CSS, but you may f
> Ian Anderson
> Great minds and all that? If you reread the previous bit of my post
> you'll see:
>
> 'So, the logo should say something like "MSNBC home page"'
Yes, but you seemed to suggest having that as the ALT, whereas I'd say
it's more appropriate to just have "MSNBC" as the ALT and have
Pls forgive my ignorance on this subject matter, I am seeking the wisdom from the list regarding CSS and objects, flash in this case.Can I leverage CSS to show common flash content across all pages of a site or am i barking up the wrong tree?
-- Chrs,Mark 617-259-6124 (m)617-249-1539 (f)"to him be
It definatly should, relax and think of home ;-)
On 23/02/06, John S. Britsios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear co-members,
>
> I would like to ask your opinion here, if a web site logo should or not
> link to the homepage.
> By the way, see for example what Jesper Tverskov wrote about this:
> ht
On 2/24/06 12:29 AM, "SunUp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks just fine to me.
And that's good enough for me.
Like everyone on this list says - if you made your pages 'right', everyone
will be able to use them no mater what they are using.
To each his/her own. I feel like everyone on this
Patrick Lauke wrote:
How about a dual approach of using ALT that describes the image (MSNBC)
and a title on the link to provide additional advisory information of
where the link is going to ('MSNBC home page'), i.e.
Great minds and all that? If you reread the previous bit of my post
you'll se
Thanks a lot Soeren. That did the trick.
Soeren Mordhorst wrote:
I set in #textbox the positioning from 'absolute' to 'relative', gave
a little 'lesser of px' in the #TJKul and it worked fine.
Maybe you have to fix some bugs in IE5x...
#textbox{
position:relative;
display:block;
left:30px;
to
I set in #textbox the positioning from 'absolute' to 'relative', gave a
little 'lesser of px' in the #TJKul and it worked fine.
Maybe you have to fix some bugs in IE5x...
#textbox{
position:relative;
display:block;
left:30px;
top:72px;
height:20px;
width:50px;
background:url(http://www.mouseride
On 23/02/06, SunUp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What is it about low quality that keeps you attracted?
>
> It's not that I'm "attracted" to it, I simply don't really care about it.
> I see those huge fancy flat screen monitors on high res, with all
> their kiddie-safe rounded corners and pastelly
> Ian Anderson
> To consider two extreme examples if the MSNBC logo was linked to the
> home page, alt text of "MSNBC" would be the least helpful,
although that is the exact equivalent of what happens visually for
sighted users, and they then use their acquired knowledge to understand
that it li
The message you sent requires that you verify that you
are a real live human being and not a spam source.
To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave
the subject line intact.
The headers of the message sent from your address are show below:
>From wsg@webstandardsgroup.
Justin Owens wrote:
* the img alt text read 'logo' but the link went to home
Your alt attribute should be modified to correctly represent the
actual image. IMHO, 'logo' is not descriptive enough to be used as
alternative text for a linked image.
In my opinion, it is important for linked image
30 matches
Mail list logo
