On 5/28/07, Mark Hedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently looking for a cost-effective (preferably opensource)
solution to run our companies UK based web site.
If you can afford to wait a few months, Magento is open-source and looks to
be pretty good:
http://www.magentocommerce.com/
On Tue, 29 May 2007 01:51:16 am Kevin Ross wrote:
Can anyone lend a hand? Thanks very much...
Regards,
Kevin.
Have you tried looking at http://www.opensourcecms.com/? They have working
installations of all Open Source CMS that you can try as user and
administrator. Sit down with the
On Tue, 29 May 2007 06:20:05 am Mark Hedley wrote:
Hi everyone.
I am currently looking for a cost-effective (preferably opensource)
solution to run our companies UK based web site.
Have you looked at the e-Commerce section at http://www.opensourcecms.com?
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst
Micky Hulse wrote:
You might want to look at these sites:
http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
http://start.websitebaker.org/en/introduction.html
Doh, just noticed I pasted the website baker url in the wrong spot, I
meant to suggest these two sites:
http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
Marvin,
I for one don't really understand what it is that you are trying to
achieve, but then that may partly be the language barrier!
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of marvin hunkin
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 3:04 AM
Hi folks
Is it just me. or have a whole slew of recent posts been OT?
CMS: there's a CMS list just for you guys. Please use it...
Photoshop and JAWS: sorry, Marvin, but that's just OT for this list.
Can we get back to the on topic issues of Web Standards, perchance?
Check the guidelines - if
Hi Mark,
Have you looked at Karova?
www.karova.com
It is XML/XSLT based, so that may be an issue if you want a PHP based
solution, but you can get in and edit the XSLTs and of course CSS, so it
is pretty flexible and compliant. Not sure about the Protx support. One
thing to be aware of is
On 29 May 2007, at 02:10:02, Sander Aarts wrote:
I'm glad the designers I work with know that rounded corners can be
a real pain in the ass, so they always ask before implementing them
in the design.
I want your designers! ;-)
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
On 5/25/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not causing validation issues does not make them fine; even if the
vast majority of user agents don't respect it, img / in an HTML
document means An image element followed by a greater than sign.
The HTML specification explicitly advises authors
On 29 May 2007, at 12:50, Alastair Campbell wrote:
On 5/25/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not causing validation issues does not make them fine; even if the
vast majority of user agents don't respect it, img / in an HTML
document means An image element followed by a greater than
On May 29, 2007, at 9:26 AM, David Dorward wrote:
Because, in an HTML document, an XHTML style img tag unambiguously
means An image element followed by a greater than sign.
Sorry to be dense, I'm trying to grasp this concept. Does (at least
strictly speaking) the inclusion of a forward
On 29 May 2007, at 14:55, Andrew Maben wrote:
On May 29, 2007, at 9:26 AM, David Dorward wrote:
Because, in an HTML document, an XHTML style img tag unambiguously
means An image element followed by a greater than sign.
Sorry to be dense, I'm trying to grasp this concept. Does (at least
Thank you for your email. I am out of the office until Monday 4th June.
Stuart
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
Assistive technology off topic???
On Tue, May 29, 2007 11:52 am, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Hi folks
Is it just me. or have a whole slew of recent posts been OT?
CMS: there's a CMS list just for you guys. Please use it...
Photoshop and JAWS: sorry, Marvin, but that's just OT for this list.
On 5/29/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because, in an HTML document, an XHTML style img tag unambiguously
means An image element followed by a greater than sign.
I still can't see where it says that in the spec, do you need to know
the SGML spec as well? It seems strange that the
Assistive Technology is by no means off topic when Web Standards are
involved.
On 5/29/07, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assistive technology off topic???
On Tue, May 29, 2007 11:52 am, NickGleitzman wrote:
Hi folks
Is it just me. or have a whole slew of recent posts been OT?
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Photoshop and JAWS: sorry, Marvin, but that's just OT for this list.
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Assistive technology off topic???
It's worth making the point: Don't get intimidated by this - JAWS is a
perfectly legitimate thing to discuss here.
Regards,
Barney
Quoting Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Assistive technology off topic???
How to use JAWS to work with Photoshop or similar apps to
create/manipulate graphics seems a bit far from web standards, so
I'd agree OT.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
On 29 May 2007, at 15:58:53, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Assistive technology off topic???
Photoshop and JAWS: sorry, Marvin, but that's just OT for this list.
Can we get back to the on topic issues of Web Standards, perchance?
Use of assistive technology with desktop applications doesn't
I still can't see where it says that in the spec, do you need to know
the SGML spec as well? It seems strange that the closing slash is
taken as the close, rather than the greater than sign, is that in the
HTML spec somewhere?
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/sgmldecl.html
FEATURES, SHORTTAG
On 5/29/07, Rimantas Liubertas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/sgmldecl.html
FEATURES, SHORTTAG YES
I guess from that I should deduce that I do need to know the SGML spec
to know that a slash will terminate a tag?
I hope HTML5 does away with this...
-Alastair
Jamie Collins wrote:
Assistive Technology is by no means off topic when Web Standards are
involved.
!? and Web Standards and Photoshop intersect exactly where? :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 ===
On 29 May 2007, at 16:14:53, Alastair Campbell wrote:
On 5/29/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because, in an HTML document, an XHTML style img tag unambiguously
means An image element followed by a greater than sign.
I still can't see where it says that in the spec, do you need to
On 29 May 2007, at 16:20:28, Barney Carroll wrote:
It's worth making the point: Don't get intimidated by this - JAWS
is a perfectly legitimate thing to discuss here.
Only in connection with its use in conjunction with a web browser.
Would you argue that a discussion of the use of Jaws with
On 29/05/07, Alastair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because, in an HTML document, an XHTML style img tag unambiguously
means An image element followed by a greater than sign.
I still can't see where it says that in the spec, do you need
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Would you argue that a discussion of the use of Jaws with Microsoft
Excel (which is, judging by the manufacturer's FAQs, one of its
commonest uses) is related to Web Standards?
Only if the .csv was downloaded off the cybercom.
A statement in the root post would easily
If you read what i said properly you will understand what i said.
Do you see the part that says'When Web Standards Are Involved'?
I didnt mention photoshop anywere, i said when Web Standards are Involved.
So since when does Photoshop mean Web Standards? Because i didn't say that.
On 5/29/07,
Hello,
Does anyone have any experience dealing with the bug in Firefox that
disables mouseover events in Flash when the animation file is placed in an
absolutely positioned element and the Wmode parameter of the animation is
set to transparent or opaque? I've built a page where an animation
Hi All,
Shawn Henry will be speaking about Web accessibility in London next week
at a free event at the University of Westminster hosted by RNIB. Shawn
will mostly talk about Web guidelines and standards, and also talk a
little about the relationship between accessibility and usability and
Thanks Liorean,
On 5/29/07, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in the same way you can't know XHTML if you have no knowledge of
XML, you can't really know HTML 2-4.01 with no knowledge of SGML. You
don't need to know all of SGML however, just the subset that is used
for HTML.
It seems
By an chance will Shawn's talk be available via web conferencing or
telephone or podcast?
On 5/29/07 11:19 AM, Swan, Henny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Shawn Henry will be speaking about Web accessibility in London next week
at a free event at the University of Westminster hosted by
Jamie Collins wrote:
If you read what i said properly you will understand what i said.
If you read the original posting properly... :-)
Do you see the part that says'When Web Standards Are Involved'?
I didnt mention photoshop anywere, i said when Web Standards are Involved.
To quote the OP:
On 29 May 2007, at 17:32:08, Alastair Campbell wrote:
It seems strange that the closing slash is
taken as the close, rather than the greater than sign, is that
in the
HTML spec somewhere?
Yes, in the SGML declaration.
Which someone linked to earlier, and I still can't translate to see
I think it would be more useful to try an work out where Marvin is
coming from when he mentions those two programs. He's on a web design
course and has some awareness of web standards and that it's good to
support screen readers. Some of these courses are still teaching 'Save
as HTML' and
On 29/05/07, Alastair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems strange that the closing slash is
taken as the close, rather than the greater than sign, is that in the
HTML spec somewhere?
Yes, in the SGML declaration.
Which someone linked to
On 5/29/07, Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The topic under discussion is, as I mentioned in my earlier post,
mentioned in HTML 4.01 at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/appendix/notes.html#h-B.3.7
as being something with poor support in HTML user agents.
Which I read, thank you, but unless
I'll be there. Anyone else?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Swan, Henny
Sent: 29 May 2007 17:19
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Web Accessibility Update from Shawn Henry, London, Tuesday 5
June
Hi All,
Shawn Henry
The bottom line is, yes its ok to discuss Jaws as long as its related to Web
Standards.
Obviously photoshop has no relation to Web Standards, so the point of this
topic is
useless, next time reporting the issue to an Admin may be a better idea :)
On 5/29/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be blogging it in the RNIB Web Access Centre blog
(www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog) and am hoping to also podcast it after the
event.
Henny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of McLaughlin, Gail G
Sent: 29 May 2007 17:36
To:
Have you checked the adobe site for info?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Gribben
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 12:28 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Firefox Wmode
Hello,
Does anyone have any experience dealing with the bug in Firefox
On 5/29/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jamie Collins wrote:
If you read what i said properly you will understand what i said.
If you read the original posting properly... :-)
Wouldn't that make the point and topic of this e-mail off topic?
Do you see the part that
Mark Hedley
Web Development Manager
Mayborn Baby Child Division
http://www.tommeetippee.com http://www.tommeetippee.com/
Jackel International Limited is a company registered in England Wales
(registered number 1894022). Our registered office is at Dudley Lane,
Cramlington,
Have you tried giving the element a z-index?
I used to have similar issues with a menu which displayed over a flash
element. Using a z-index solved this.
Hope that's useful?
Regards,
Mark Hedley
Web Development Manager
Tommee Tippee
http://www.tommeetippee.com/
From: [EMAIL
John wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have any experience dealing with the bug in Firefox that
disables mouseover events in Flash when the animation file is placed in an
absolutely positioned element and the Wmode parameter of the animation is
set to transparent or opaque? I've built a page
Just set the element with a z-index and the problem will be solved.
Cheers,
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ted Drake
Sent: 29 May 2007 19:27
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Firefox Wmode
John wrote:
Hello,
Does
Nick Fitzsimons schreef:
On 29 May 2007, at 02:10:02, Sander Aarts wrote:
I'm glad the designers I work with know that rounded corners can be a
real pain in the ass, so they always ask before implementing them in
the design.
I want your designers! ;-)
Well, it's only because they know that
My apologies to the group... I was not aware of the CMS list.
Is there a way to have the entire post,
http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg28689.html
ported over to the [WSG-CMS] list?
Regards,
Kevin.
On 5/29/07, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks
Is it
Where on the site do you sign up for the CMS List? I am also after
support from people in this list.
Cheers,
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kevin Ross
Sent: 29 May 2007 20:04
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] OT on list
My apologies
Nick Fitzsimons schreef:
On 29 May 2007, at 16:20:28, Barney Carroll wrote:
Would you argue that a discussion of the use of Jaws with Microsoft
Excel (which is, judging by the manufacturer's FAQs, one of its
commonest uses) is related to Web Standards?
No, because MS and Web Standards ar
Hi Mark,
You can sign up for the CMS list by logging into WSG at
http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/login_edit.cfm then set your preferences
to Full CMS list or CMS list in digest mode.
Regards,
Elaine
http://www.webdandy.co.uk
Mark Hedley wrote:
Where on the site do you sign up for the CMS List? I am also after
support from people in this list.
Yeah, the CMS list is hard to find.
I signed-up for it when I signed-up for this list... Other than that, I
have not found any reference to the CMS list on the net.
I
Alastair Campbell wrote:
On 5/29/07, Rimantas Liubertas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/sgmldecl.html
FEATURES, SHORTTAG YES
I guess from that I should deduce that I do need to know the SGML spec
to know that a slash will terminate a tag?
I hope HTML5 does away
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Assistive technology off topic?
Barney Carroll wrote:
It's worth making the point: Don't get intimidated by this - JAWS is a
perfectly legitimate thing to discuss here.
When it's used to access Photoshop - which in my experience doesn't
have a whole lot to do with
Alastair Campbell wrote:
On 5/29/07, Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The topic under discussion is, as I mentioned in my earlier post,
mentioned in HTML 4.01 at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/appendix/notes.html#h-B.3.7
as being something with poor support in HTML user agents.
Which I
Enough with the discussion on off topic on topic.
Causing far to much green house gas emissions.
Thanks
Russ
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Ive been following the sliding doors II article and have it working
somewhat well. However I cant see the reason for the 1st set of
decendent selectors below. The second set with the anchor tag is used to
create the current link state but I dont see what the first set is
for. The first
Hi all.
This one didn't make it to the Reccomended readings, but it seems well
worth to me:
http://accessites.org/site/2007/05/wcag2-woeful-to-wonderful-in-one-easy-draft/
djn
--
-
Dejan Kozina
Dolina 346 (TS) - I-34018 Italy
tel./fax: +39 040 228 436 - cell.: +39 348 7355 225
From: Daniel Longstaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marvin hunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re: [WSG] Accessible Photoshop and flash
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:03:13 +0930
Hi Marvin
I'm not quite sure if you understand what will be required in these
subjects. Photoshop and Flash are only the
www.richardson.co.nz
In Firefox 2/Opera on Windows the lightbox images show 'null' as the
caption.
All the best.
This email with any attachments is confidential and may be subject to legal
privilege.
If it is not intended for you please reply immediately, destroy it and do not
copy,
Subject: FW: Re: [WSG] Accessible Photoshop and flash
Flash is currently not accessible to Jaws or any screen readers
although there are methods for only sending it to the people who can use
it.
Rob
As far as I understood, the latest version of Adobe Flash *is*
accessible to
60 matches
Mail list logo
