My goal is still to learn what markup solutions others have settled on
for headline/tagline and title/byline pairs.
Regards,
Paul
If you are interested in what others have settled on try the NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/06/education/06montana.html?_r=1oref=slogin
Best,
~dL
--
CK wrote:
http://working.bushidodeep.com/dom_site/template.php
Hi,
Typography is the emphasis of this creation, so a review for
readability is desired. Please send along screen captures of any
strange behavior. Concerned with the absolute placement of the
navigation and the generated
CK wrote:
Hi,
As monochromatic minimalism is a tight-rope walk, please suggest a
kicker.
On Apr 29, 2007, at 8:31 PM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Passed. But needs a kicker (is the text a little bland like sort of,
maybe? :-) ).
Monochromatic minimalism? You've got to be kidding :-) .
dt
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Greetings all,
I was hoping some of you fine Linux / Mac users could test this layout
to make sure no blowups happen. Everything SHOULD be fine, but you
never know.
http://homestead.foodzoomer.com/
Thanks a bunch!
Everything SHOULD be fine, but you never
Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
One more question please...
When I resize http://geofeat.com/ to 800x600 the H3 heading *Featured
Advertisers* (third heading on page content) floats right.
I have tried all sorts of css to fix this but end up with more problems
(specifically to do with excess
John Horner wrote:
Speaking of redesigns, http://www.newyorker.com/ is looking very nice
these days. Not a table in sight.
but other than that it looks like a good standards-based website.
Yes, well, sort of...still the need (for me) to go through the drill of
ignoring their
Lee Powell wrote:
Last evening I was playing around with some conceptual work which
included a vast number of headers, and it got me thinking into how
best to use them, and indeed how the spec says to use them. The W3C
spec states, that the range of headers goes from h1 through to h6, and
Dylan Lindgren wrote:
If I could get you guys to have a look at the website
www.lagunadesigns.com.au it would be greatly appreciated.
Dylan Lindgren
Dylan,
I think you are off to a good start. The w3c markup validation service
will point to the same few errors on all pages. It is important
Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
We have recently unveiled a new project on all things green,
eco-friendly and organic:
http://geofeat.com/
I would really appreciate feedback on issues related to standards,
usability and accessibility.
Sarah :)
Quick look in XP, Sarah.
Doing well in
Michael Cordover wrote:
There is a file: default.ie.css, linked from an IE conditional comment
and contains exactly that rule already.
Further suggestions?
The requested URL /default.ie.css was not found on this server
Michael
Regards,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Im using the pure css - alphaimageloader hack for png transparency.
The problem is that its setting of a security warning in ie 6.
The pngs will only show up if you click ok and allow the script.
www.mcmonagle.biz/arena7
-best
kevin mcmonagle
No clue.
But this may
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
David and lindsay,
Thanks for the advice on clearing the floats. Can you check that this
layout holds up in ie 6 now?
In reference to your uri: http://mcmonagle.biz/arena7/
As far as I can tell, you only cleared the float. The page is still
broken in ie6, ie/7, ff,
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
The problem is the wrapper div is not being expanded by the two nested
columns within it.
Theres no hieghts set. Also margins are showing up abovr the wrapper
and footer divs even though they're set to 0. Only looked at it in
firefox mac so far would like to fix
13 matches
Mail list logo
