#x27;s javascript "resize fix" for Netscape 4 that they should
accommodate my browsing environment, and I WAS using the latest
browser.
I'll repeat, it's probably my own fault. I just thought I'd share
their philosophy with the list. Their tone was astonishing pos
"It came to me that reform should begin at home, and since that day I
have not had time to remake the world. -Will Durant, historian
(1885-1981)"
Me 'n my big mouth :(
Some people never learn, eh.
Thanks to all the responses on and off list.
(still not so sunny) sunup
Hi folks,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening my
big mouth about other dubious issues I notice on their site, are now
over.
I dropped a line to my ISP (ostensibly to enquire about my account)
and menti
>If you don't mind me asking, what are your reasons for making this decision?
Purely based on font size. ... and in response to this:
>just because you use higher resolutions doesn't mean you have smaller text...
... *nod* I know. I have messed with that several times. It all ends
up looking mos
>What is it about low quality that keeps you attracted?
It's not that I'm "attracted" to it, I simply don't really care about it.
I see those huge fancy flat screen monitors on high res, with all
their kiddie-safe rounded corners and pastelly colours. They look like
a Fisher-Price toy.
At this re
>Woah! They're such low resolutions, do you only have a 15" monitor?
Gee you guys ... not everyone has the latest 'n greatest in equipment.
My work (government) PC has a 17" mon, 800x600 (because I LIKE this
res, and I wish I had a dollar for every site I have to horizontal
scroll on). My depart
Thanks very much to the reponses on- and off-list to my question. Much
appreciated.
I have plenty to go on.
thanks again,
sunny
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
Hi folks,
I'm doing an FAQ page, and want to make it so only the questions
appear on page load, then when selected, the answers appear below
them. A toggle effect. You know.
I've found a couple of methods:
http://www.netlobo.com/div_hiding.html
http://www.mindsack.com/toggle/
.. but I'm not hap
... in D-Lib magazine, for those interested in such things (flickr,
technorati, del.icio.us):
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html
from the introduction:
"A folksonomy is a type of distributed classification system. It is
usually created by a group of individuals, typically the resou
Hi folks,
I've googled, searched the list archives, and have come up with no
answer to a problem.
I cannot post a URL as example; it's all internal. I'm hoping it will
be a case of someone going "oh yea, that's and here's how
you fix it".
I've built a form, which, upon submit, calls a success.p
>... place the last word of the link within the span.
>
> So The last word for longer links
Ok ok, I know I said I'd given up, but I tried this, and it finally worked.
Still ... it's weird that it didn't show up before. And in fact, when
I move the back to get this ...
http://webstandardsgrou
> > Set a width or padding on your exit class that is sufficient to display the
> > image.
>
Yes, did that. I still can't see the wretched thing.
> And get the class name in the html matching the css. In fact,
> the span doesn't need a class at all if you do this:
>
> a.external span { /* whatev
> ... what Jon and I meant was to put the span at the end of the link like
> this:
>
> The link
*nod*
I did try that.
And then the CSS would be:
span.exit {
background: url(media/external.gif) no-repeat;
}
yea?
It doesn't show at all :(
Clearly I need a sign on my back that says "I'm too
e Castle") suffer in their jocks.
thanks,
sunny
On 11/24/05, Jon Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SunUp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is there a way to make it display the image at the END of the LINK,
> >instead of at the end of the LINE?
> >I'v
Hi folks,
I'm displaying a small image to indicate an external link using this:
a.external:after {
content: url(media/external.gif);
padding-left: 2px;
}
Obviously IE doesn't show this, so I've used this in a separate style
sheet for IE:
a.external {
background: url(media/external.gif) no
Hi folks,
For those who can't afford it, or refuse to pay it, or just want to try
it add-free for free (eek, try saying that fast 3 times), Opera are
giving away free registration (Mac, PC and other OSs) for today only.
http://my.opera.com/community/party/reg.dml
My apologies if this incurs the
My style sheet contains this line:
.clearfix {display: inline-block;}
When I validate I get one error: "Invalid number : display
inline-block is not a display value : inline-block"
The word "display" links to
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#propdef-display.
That's CSS2, right?
I then
Hi folks,
As an information professional I read a lot of "for librarians"
publications. The current issue of Ariadne (http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/)
has several articles that might be of interest to some in this group:
"Involving Users in the Development of a Web Accessibility Tool"
http://www.ariadn
A sincere "thank you" to everyone who took the time and effort to
respond on this, on and off list.
I feel somewhat vindicated; there was certainly some unequivocal support.
There are also some excellent quotes to use next time I grumble to a
site about missing or obscured content.
In response t
>accessibility means access for everyone regardless of technology availability
> or other kinds of disabilities. I think web standards were meant to raise
> awareness
> first and give an impulse to all of us to build a better web.
>A web for everyone, everywhere !
*applause*
i have to chime in
hi folks,
enlightenment required pls:
1. why doesn't this pretty list work in IE5.0?
2. and how do i convince it (violently if necessary) to do so?
#navcontainer ul
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style-type: none;
text-align: center;
}
#navcontainer ul li { display: inline; }
#navcontainer ul l
21 matches
Mail list logo
