I need to write a print style sheet and have a particular element on
the page print at a specific absolute size (85mm by 35mm). I've set
the size using the mm units in the style sheet, but the element is
printing at 65mm wide.
>From what I can see, mm (and cm) are well supported measurements in
di
our net by up to 80%.
What I'm saying is: I don't know how much I care about this issue.
Yes, it's shocking that anyone would try this in Australia, but aren't
it's chances of getting off the ground about zero?
Nedlud.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Blake <[EMAIL PROT
Okay, so I *should* be concerned about this, in spite of what my
common sense tells me.
So what can we, as web professionals (in Australia), do about it?
I've signed the getup petition. What's the next step?
Nedlud.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Having worked as both a teacher in higher ed, and in a support role
for teachers in higher ed, I have to agree 100% with Andrew.
Flash is the devil you know. Teachers use it so they don't have to
learn something new. It amazes me how many people still get away with
making flash sites, and burning
I'll confess my ignorance on this issue, but how do screen readers
handle DHTML type injection of content into the DOM?
Without using alerts, you could add the warning into the actual
document. But how does a screen reader know the document has changed?
L.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Anthon
How old was this book? Check the publication date and add 1 year
(cause it can take that long for a book to get edited etc before it
goes into publication) and then consider what browsers were arounf
when the book was written. That may help understand why it's so behind
the times.
The web is rapid
How old was this book? Check the publication date and add 1 year
(cause it can take that long for a book to get edited etc before it
goes into publication) and then consider what browsers were arounf
when the book was written. That may help understand why it's so behind
the times.
The web is rapid
As I understand this thread, it is not about whether current standards
are right or wrong, but how did we end up with these standards in the
first place?
The current standards did not just spring into existence, fully
formed, out of the brow of some greek god. The standards evolved as
peoples unde
So true.
But how long has the WG been working on HTML5? And assuming anyone
ever reaches consensus on that, how long until browsers start
supporting it in wide enough numbers for it to be a practical
alternative for developers?
Technology can change fast, but in the world of web, it can take some
Out of curiosity, what sort of feature are you talking about that
can't be done server side (ie, *without* AJAX)?
I'll confess to relying heavily on server side JS on some projects,
but I did so because I knew those apps would be used exclusively on an
intranet where the SOE was known to support J
Try validating your page first. If there is a problem with your markup, it
may cause things to go boom.
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fstartrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com%2F
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
> hi.
> well on the site at http://startrekca
I second that.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Susie Gardner-Brown wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I’d just like to send a big thank you to Russ Weakley for taking the time
> to collate and send this to WSG Announce each week! I always find really
> interesting stuff there, and usually bookmark a couple
I have a content management system that uses frames for layout (not my
choice). We need to improve the accessibility of the site. Short of ditching
the CMS (not going to happen any time soon), or getting the vendor to write
better code (also not likely to happen), how can we improve the
accessibili
Hi everyone.
I was just looking at a page on the National Library of Australia web site (
http://www.nla.gov.au/services/issnabout.html) and noticed the font
rendering was strange in my browser (Firefox 3.5.3). When I looked at the
markup to try and understand why, I found that the site seem to be
Don't use onclick.
Bind the events in your JavaScript. A library like jQuery makes this easy
and browser independent.
It's better code and solves your validation problems.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:20 AM, designer wrote:
> Precisely!
>
> - Original Message - From: "Anthony Gr."
> To:
Don't forget that old school named anchors actually used the "name"
attribute...
the target
Then linked to it the same way you would for any tag with an id...
click here
I think IE6 still requires this technique.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nathanael Boehm wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
> Sure yo
Hi there,
I need to write a web style guide for our web site. Does anyone know of any
good examples I could draw inspiration from?
We already have our style sheets etc working, but need to have some kind of
documentation we can hand to third party or contract developers so they can
work to our st
t.com/articles/writingainterfacestyleguide/)
> > Government of Canada's Common Look and Feel for the Internet
> > (http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/clf2-nsi2/index-eng.asp)
> >
> > Kris
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:59 PM, nedlud wrote:
> >>
In terms of coding such a form, are you populating the state field with any
information that depends on knowing what country the user is in? (or any
other location dependant information in other fields?).
If the answer is yes, then I'd say it's quite important to have the country
field *before* st
Might be a stupid question, but are you testing with a browser that supports
the text-shadow feature?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:49 PM, tee wrote:
> I declared text-shadow in an a element
>
> #element li a {text-shadow: 2px 2px 2px #000;}
>
> but in hover and descendent I would like to disable i
Hi people,
I see that the Australian government has required all government agency web
sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility
I work for a non profit organisation that receives government funding, but I
am unaware of our legal obligation to acces
Thanks for that Kerry.
On 24 February 2010 14:17, Webb, KerryA wrote:
> Nedlud wrote:
>
> > Hi people,
> >
> > I see that the Australian government has required all government
> > agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
> >
> > http:
That's exactly what it means ;)
Sad but true.
Resources ... blah blah ... deadlines ... blah blah ... too much work ..
blah blah ...
I suspect it's a familiar story to many.
L.
On 24 February 2010 14:59, sans principles wrote:
> Does this mean the moral obligation alone is not compelling eno
Regardless of how you implement this, I'd advise running away once the money
clears. Also make sure they pay *lots* for maintenance on the site. Don't
get caught out when they get told by somebody else that their site sucks
because it's got music in it. I also wouldn't put such a job in my
portfoli
I have a web form I'm building and there is a simple yes/no question in it.
I got to wondering what the best semantic mark up for this is? Does anyone
have any good UI/UX suggestions?
My three ideas were...
Two radio buttons for "yes" and "no"...
Do you...?
Yes
No
A single check box. A tick imp
Medical, Dental, Vision - Radio Button No.
> Third iteration - Do you...have any Group Medical, Dental or Vision
> coverage..with Acme Insurance" = checkbox's for Medical, Dental,
> Vision - implied is if you don't check any, you would of selected No.
>
> So to sum u
Our site is a large health care site. Of the ~25 visitors in the last
month, Google says the break down by browser is...
Internet Explorer 69.44%
Firefox 15.98%
Safari 9.32%
Chrome 4.20%
And of the IE traffic, we get...
IE 8.0 37.90%
IE 7.0 32.87%
IE 6.0 29.23%
er
> W3C Mobile Web Initiative
> http://www.w3.org/Mobile
>
> http://philarcher.org
> @philarcher1
>
> nedlud wrote:
>
>> Our site is a large health care site. Of the ~25 visitors in the last
>> month, Google says the break down by browser is...
>>
>&
Notepad++ is a good free editor for Windows that should work for this.
On 25 June 2010 15:54, Jelina Korhecz wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> As far as I'm aware, this is still necessary. However, if you're
> doing a huge replacement of & to & you can use BBEdit or (the free
> version) Text Wrangler to fin
29 matches
Mail list logo
