Re: [WSG] semantic way to use subscript or superscript

Thank you. Patrick H. Lauke wrote: dszady wrote: I also remember a post saying not to use the two elements but it didn't mention why. In my opinion, sub and sup have a primarily visual/presentational nature, rather than a semantic one. I'm still puzzled as to why they're

[WSG] semantic way to use subscript or superscript

post saying not to use the two elements but it didn't mention why. -- °¿° dszady; a.k.a. Daryl A. Szady ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on post

Re: [WSG] Wish-list for 2006

fully support XHTML 2.0 and CSS3 Happy New Year! -- °¿° dszady; a.k.a. Daryl A. Szady Linux registered user: 347957 Machine: 240627 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for

[WSG] Re: [css-d] Newbie needs help PLEASE

Mark Lundquist wrote: On Aug 1, 2005, at 7:51 PM, Matthew Ohlman wrote: Jon Trelfa wrote: [...] Javascript in a

Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf

Donna Jones wrote: Not exactly a clean user experience then. Particularly troublesome when designers rely on the background image and define colour for their text to be readable against it, but fail to provide fallback background colour. Zengarden is an experimental site, showcasing in many c

Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf

Donna Jones wrote: Not exactly a clean user experience then. Particularly troublesome when designers rely on the background image and define colour for their text to be readable against it, but fail to provide fallback background colour. Zengarden is an experimental site, showcasing in many c

Re: [WSG] make poverty history website

So. On 5/19/05, Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nancy Johnson wrote: > > > Is it true that the W3C has not done a spec for Flash? If that is so > > why? > > Because Flash is a proprietary product! > > > Yours > > Andy Budd > > http://www.andybudd.com/ > 01273 241355 > 07880 636677 >

Re: [WSG] Firefox bug?

It looks fine on a Pentiun II 333 box with Firefox 1.03 running on Mandrake 10.0. On 4/29/05, designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ladies and gentlemen, [...] > Thank you, > > Bob McClelland, > Cornwall (U.K.) > www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk -- °¿° *

Re: [WSG] 3.2

Sorry. Your Highness. On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:32:39 -0800, Chris W. Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > on Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:56 AM said: > > > Looks good in Konqueror. > > Please don't send 107kb attachments to a public mailing list. In