Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
On 4/9/05 1:01 AM Absalom Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
I'm still only recieving one copy of everyone else's post on the list
apart from scott.
You might as well set a trash/junk mail rule. That's what I've done.
HTH
Rick Faaberg
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
having to have the flash plugin and having to have a web browser? it is
very hard
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
Please, scott, I'm being spammed to death with your post in this thread
endlessly repeating in the WSG list.
Can you hold off the barbarian hordes for a while ?
Thanks
Lawrence Meckan
--
Lawrence Meckan
Absalom Media
Mob: (04) 1047 9633
ABN: 49 286 495 792
http://www.absalom.biz
Please, scott, I'm being spammed to death with your post in this thread
endlessly repeating in the WSG list.
Can you hold off the barbarian hordes for a while ?
Thanks
Lawrence Meckan
--
Lawrence Meckan
Absalom Media
Mob: (04) 1047 9633
ABN: 49 286 495 792
http://www.absalom.biz
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
I don't think it's him, because I only sent one copy of my previous message
and I just received two copies with the rest of the stuff from the list, it
may be a technical diffidulty with the list.
On 4/9/05 12:41 AM, Absalom Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, scott, I'm being spammed to
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always wondered what the difference was between
On Apr 9, 2005 4:39 AM, Absalom Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, scott, I'm being spammed to death with your post in this thread
endlessly repeating in the WSG list.
The first of the junk copies had an address 'IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]' listed as a recipient in
addition to the
Ryan wrote:
I don't think it's him, because I only sent one copy of my previous message
and I just received two copies with the rest of the stuff from the list, it
may be a technical diffidulty with the list.
I'm still only recieving one copy of everyone else's post on the list
apart from
On 4/9/05 1:01 AM Absalom Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
I'm still only recieving one copy of everyone else's post on the list
apart from scott.
You might as well set a trash/junk mail rule. That's what I've done.
HTH
Rick Faaberg
Apologies all.
The mail server has been rebooted, lets see how we go.
Thanks for your patience
Russ
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote:
In and of itself, flash will never be accessible to everybody, as it
requires a plugin; it's not a web native technology.
A plugin huh?, I've always
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
what happened? I've received more responses like this
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; IMB Recipient 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty
Patrick Lauke wrote
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:16:45 -0400, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But is it worth looking into for more than just flash videos/
games and sIFR?
With smelling salts in hand, I offer a words on this topic.
Currently speaking, and screen readers aside - as I doubt Flash works with
screen
101 - 158 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
