On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 03:16 -0400, James Bennett wrote:
> Since Gecko-based browsers render (nearly) identically on all
> platforms, there's no need to worry on that count
I thought I'd take this opportunity to hijack a thread and ask about a
weird problem I've been having with Firefox on Window
On 10/12/05, Paul Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >but there should be something similar which uses the KDE desktop.
>
> Knoppix uses KDE from (rather rusty) memory
>
> http://www.Knoppix.org
It does. There's also a KDE version of Ubuntu called Kubuntu:
http://kubuntu.org/
--
"May the forc
On 10/12/05, Craig Rippon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Genuine question:
>
> Is this because they visit, it doesn't work, and they don't come back,
> forever losing them as a customer?
Probably not. Linux users tend to be running either a Gecko-based
browser (Mozilla, Firefox, Galeon and Epiphany
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:34:35 +0930, Katrina wrote:
> May I ask you which college/uni teaches web development?
I believe Craig is a TAFE student in Brisbane, but I could be mistaken.
warmly,
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems - http://elysiansystems.com/
Brisbane, Australia
*
Katrina wrote:
I'm sorry, I totally didn't mean to send that to the list.
Kat
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
Craig Rippon wrote:
Kay, thanks. I am a web development student at college and this point came
up in a lecture, just curious to get opinions.
Cheers
Craig R.
Gday,
I am a uni student at University of South Australia.
May I ask you which college/uni teaches web development?
Kat
***
>but there should be something similar which uses the KDE desktop.
Knoppix uses KDE from (rather rusty) memory
http://www.Knoppix.org
Paul
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guide
On 10/13/05, Nick Cowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to test in Linux, get a copy of Ubuntu live CD, drop the CD into
> your drive, reboot from the CD and you have a fully function Linux box,
> unfortunately it uses the Gnome desktop which knocks out testing Konqueror,
> but there sh
Ian
I am with Kay on Netscape 6.2 it was based on Mozilla 0.9.4.1 and released in
October 2001. And quickly followed by 6.2.1 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 and then replaced
within a year by Netscape 7 which ran a real Mozilla engine 1.0.1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape
NS 6.2 has not been in my "
Kay Smoljak wrote:
My layouts are pretty basic, so I doubt it wouldn't work. I think the
number of people out in the general public using Linux on the desktop
is infintismally (sp?) small.
Hem
not "infinitesimally small", but fewer than Windows. Possibly as many as
Mac. IMHO designers fuss a
Hi Craig,
On 10/13/05, Craig Rippon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kay, thanks. I am a web development student at college and this point came
> up in a lecture, just curious to get opinions.
While it's important to be accessible to everyone, harsh economic
realities dictate that you have to draw t
: [WSG] Chinese food and web standards
My layouts are pretty basic, so I doubt it wouldn't work. I think the number
of people out in the general public using Linux on the desktop is
infintismally (sp?) small.
On 10/13/05, Craig Rippon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "and the ma
"and the market share of Linux in general in my own web site stats is next to
nil."
Wouldn't a LOT of Linux users now be Firefox users too?
The OS is not the concern here (although Konqueror is Linux exclusive? ), it's
getting things working in (somewhat imperfect) browsers.
Ian is expressing
My layouts are pretty basic, so I doubt it wouldn't work. I think the
number of people out in the general public using Linux on the desktop
is infintismally (sp?) small.
On 10/13/05, Craig Rippon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "and the market share of Linux in general in my own web site stats is
Sorry for being unclear. The page is pretty broken with overlaid content.
You can see my browsercam output at
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=198424
Got it. Yes, pretty "broken"!
Fix the display in those browsers if and when you can.
If only I knew where to start... It's taken
"and the market share of Linux in general in my own web site stats is next
to nil."
Genuine question:
Is this because they visit, it doesn't work, and they don't come back,
forever losing them as a customer?
Craig Rippon
Brisbane, Australia
*
John wrote:
> Define "doesn't work"? [I don't have those browsers to hand]
>
> If it "doesn't work" in the sense that some of the content is
> invisible or illegible, links aren't clickable etc, then I don't
> think I'd say it was acceptable.
Sorry for being unclear. The page is pretty broken w
On 10/13/05, Ian Fenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a lovely new em-based page on Chinese food that works fine in
> practically everything apart from Netscape 6.2 and Konqueror 3.05.
>
> 1) Is it acceptable to go live with a layout that doesn't work with either
> of these two browsers? (I not
1) Is it acceptable to go live with a layout that doesn't work with either
of these two browsers? (I notice that a number of prominent web standardista
websites have done so)
Define "doesn't work"? [I don't have those browsers to hand]
If it "doesn't work" in the sense that some of the content
19 matches
Mail list logo