RE: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Ted Drake
Hi Marilyn As the one that started the last table thread, I would recommend providing us with an example. Your request, like mine, can be interpreted in many ways. Ted -Original Message-From: Marilyn Langfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 11:47

Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Marilyn Langfeld wrote: How should I mark up text that's submitted as a Word table, especially when each cell may contain a mix of partial sentences, full sentences, list items? Sometime with three or four columns, and eight or ten rows? It's a layout table, so - once we get over the fundamental

RE: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Ted Drake
Subject: Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table Marilyn Langfeld wrote: How should I mark up text that's submitted as a Word table, especially when each cell may contain a mix of partial sentences, full sentences, list items? Sometime with three or four columns, and eight

Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Marilyn Langfeld
Here's a simple example. Just two columns, two rows, one set of column heads and row heads within the main cells. Column One: Column Head: Objectives Recommended action lines for WHO and Member States Cell One: x-tad-smallerPolicy /x-tad-smallerx-tad-smaller- Ensure public policies

Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Ted Drake wrote: wait, now I'm confused. table headers, thead/tbody, summary tags are structural? They give structure to tabular data. I thought they were meant to define the data and were good. Not when the data in question is not tabular data. If the table is used for layout, it should not

Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Marilyn Langfeld wrote: *Here's a simple example. Just two columns, two rows, one set of column heads and row heads within the main cells. Ok, right, that clarifies it. In this case you are, in effect, providing tabular data - that wasn't quite clear from the original email. If I understand it

Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: If I understand it correctly, here's the structure I'd suggest. Actually, re-reading your example data, I did misunderstand your structure. In fairness, it seems a bit convoluted. This is looking more and more like a complex table that needs proper ids and header

RE: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Ted Drake
this together. How's that for wishy washy recommendations. Ted www.tdrake.net -Original Message- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 1:09 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table Marilyn

Re: [WSG] Correct styling of text material submitted as a table

2005-01-14 Thread Marilyn Langfeld
Okay. I feel more confident then, if given text like my example. Thanks for the example markup. That does help. I was beginning to wonder, after the earlier discussion, whether only numeric data could be semantically correct in a table. Best regards, Marilyn Langfeld