Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-13 Thread Vaska . WSG
I'm following behind the curve on this one as it seems people have put this to rest. However, I really do not want to be grouped into a category of people who believe in standards above all else. I am a print designer first and foremost. My response, below, was really more about shock than

RE: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-13 Thread Mike Pepper
My response, below, was really more about shock than anything else. I couldn't believe that somebody would propose to take the visual design out of things. If that were the case, I would probably stop building websites tommorrow. In reality, it would need to be much higher than 7% to get me to

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread afdesign
Alan, What articles are you referring to? Andrei Herasimchuk writes some excellent posts against this kind of attitude at his site, Design By Fire (http://www.designbyfire.com/). See for instance the now famous Design Matters (http://www.designbyfire.com/59.html) or Gurus v. Bloggers,

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread !!blue
Jeremy, Can I copy your statement, paste it in Illustrator, make it prettty bold, and post it here at work on the bulletin board? Please?! Too many creatives here (at where I work) don't seem to understand this concept... thanks, Zulema · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ! ! b

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Alan Milnes
What articles are you referring to? Well there's quite a few but here's one where the basic idea is right but I find it just a tad idealistic:- http://www.westciv.com/style_master/house/good_oil/not_paper/ Alan * The discussion list for

RE: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread P.H.Lauke
Can I copy your statement, paste it in Illustrator, make it prettty bold, and post it here at work on the bulletin board? Please?! You could, but then you'd just show that you haven't understood the basic premise behind his statement...as you're effectively trying to force a certain visual

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Jeremy Flint
sure, go ahead. - Jeremy Flint www.jeremyflint.com !!blue wrote: Jeremy, Can I copy your statement, paste it in Illustrator, make it prettty bold, and post it here at work on the bulletin board? Please?! Too many creatives here (at where I work) don't seem to understand this concept...

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Jeremy Flint
Actually, I think it was Jeff Veen who mentioned something along those lines at SXSW. Kind of stuck with me. - Jeremy Flint www.jeremyflint.com !!blue wrote: Jeremy, Can I copy your statement, paste it in Illustrator, make it prettty bold, and post it here at work on the bulletin board?

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread afdesign
Alan That article was written in 1999 as an intervention against the printed page paradigm and to get desinegers to transition to CSS. While John Allsopp does have some fairly strident views on web design* which make for good discussions, based on the criterion you set out in your first post,

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Vaska . WSG
Yes, but are there any really hard statistics about what the public is doing. We know roughly 7% don't use or diable javascript. But what about disabling styles? On 12 May 2004, at 16:13, Jeremy Flint wrote: On the web, you really have NO control over your site once it is public. Users have

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Justin French
On 12/05/2004, at 11:03 PM, Alan Milnes wrote: I have seen some articles on the web that say we shouldn't care about how our web sites look as long as they use valid mark up language and separate content from presentation.   Personally I want to design web sites that:-   1) Look good in

RE: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread P.H.Lauke
Yes, but are there any really hard statistics about what the public is doing. We know roughly 7% don't use or diable javascript. But what about disabling styles? rant type=unfocussed rambling Why is that relevant? Heck, it's almost like we're going back to the old how many % of users

Re: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Jeremy Flint
the meaning behind my statement was more to the fact that there are a lot of different options for people to browse the web now. its not like 5 years ago when all people were using were computers with browsers. now people are using cell phones, palm pilots, pocket pcs, etc. there are screen

RE: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Mkear
It seems to me that too many people confuse Design with artwork or colours, pictures – the pretty stuff.But design goes a lot further than that. It’s to do with DOES IT DO THE JOB IT'S FOR?. A designer has to take account of the medium he’s designing for. A designer for a magazine has to

RE: [WSG] Design Philosophy

2004-05-12 Thread Nancy Johnson
I have been following this thread and this is a wonderful answer. Nancy Johnson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mkear Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Design Philosophy It seems to me