I agree, but within reason. If the topic is related to the Web (i.e.
standards, design, app development, database engineering, systems
integration, education, etc.) then it's on point.
A more open forum will only help to facilitate, and bring attention to
"Web Standards," which has to seemlessly i
But until you do that - 99% of the people who have subscribed here have
done so in the hopes of discussing web standards, and no other aspects
of the internet.
Pay them the respect they deserve and bring only those discussions here.
*
I do pay respect (by not participating except for this o
On Sat, 15 May 2004 10:26:25 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
> This list is good, but the moderators like to keep it on topic, I think
> mainly to please some of the people that work for the government, and these
> people (not specifically government people) do not know how to sort or skip
> off topic thr
ehalf Of Ryan Christie
> Sent: Saturday, 15 May 2004 8:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Is a degree necessary? THREAD CLOSED -
> Open it back up! Please.
>
>
> Active discussions get their head lopped off when they don't have
> anything to do w
> Sent: Saturday, 15 May 2004 8:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Is a degree necessary? THREAD CLOSED -
> Open it back up! Please.
>
>
> Active discussions get their head lopped off when they don't have
> anything to do with standards. This part
Active discussions get their head lopped off when they don't have
anything to do with standards. This particular thread covered the value
of a university degree in the web design business... had it have been
"the lack of decent web design instruction in major universities", it
would have carrie
Why do the active threads get killed? Some one asks a decent question and
gets some very valid input only to get killed off???
Just because something may not be of interest to the particular moderator on
duty, I'd like to see a little consideration out there as well - if it is
producing some inter
