Re: [WSG] Need a fresh eye - can anyone see what's wrong please?

2010-12-01 Thread Debbie Johnson
Mike - You have put the background color and image under background-image. Why don't you consolidate all of your backround statements into one: #footer { color: #d9d9d9; background: #33 url(images/Footer_background_s1.jpg) repeat-x top; min-height: 96px; } Otherwise,

Re: [WSG] Need a fresh eye - can anyone see what's wrong please?

2010-12-01 Thread Jon @ The PixelForge
I agree, consolidate background-image, background-repeat and *-position into one 'background' statement. Easier and saves a few bytes. Regards, Jon Warner Tel: 0788 99 424 30 http://thepixelforge.net/ 57 Arnold Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5AR England On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Debbie

RE: [WSG] Need a fresh eye - can anyone see what's wrong please?

2010-11-30 Thread Tatham Oddie
Mike, This line is invalid: background-image: #33 url(images/Footer_background_s1.jpg); You're defining both the color *and* the url in the image property. Either change it to: background-image: url(images/Footer_background_s1.jpg); background-color: #33; or:

RE: [WSG] Need a fresh eye - can anyone see what's wrong please?

2010-11-30 Thread Tatham Oddie
Mike, This line is invalid: background-image: #33 url(images/Footer_background_s1.jpg); You're defining both the color *and* the url in the image property. Either change it to: background-image: url(images/Footer_background_s1.jpg); background-color: #33; or:

RE: [WSG] Need a fresh eye - can anyone see what's wrong please?

2010-11-30 Thread Mike Kear
: Wednesday, 1 December 2010 4:14 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Need a fresh eye - can anyone see what's wrong please? Mike, This line is invalid: background-image: #33 url(images/Footer_background_s1.jpg); You're defining both the color *and* the url in the image