Terrence Wood wrote:
Thierry Koblentz said:
Ian Rifkin wrote:
It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It does up until XP SP2 where they changed the rules A site will
have to be trusted for CSS expression to work where
Thierry Koblentz said:
> Ian Rifkin wrote:
>> It won't work if javascript is off.
>
> I'm not sure about that.
> I believe it still works with script disabled.
It does up until XP SP2 where they changed the rules A site will have
to be trusted for CSS expression to work where JS is off.
kind
Ok thanks all!
--
C Montoya
rdpdesign.com ... liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list &
On 22 Oct 2005, at 2:53 pm, Lea de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:53:51 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
width:740px;
expression( fluid and max-width stuff )
Logically, I would expect this to work.
Set the width to 740, then reset it with the expression.
If the expression is inoperative
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:53:51 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
> width:740px;
> expression( fluid and max-width stuff )
Logically, I would expect this to work.
Set the width to 740, then reset it with the expression.
If the expression is inoperative then voila, its set to 740
I don't have time to t
Ok, so my final questions is... is there a fallback for expression() ?
Something in IE for expression that functions like for
I first discovered these expressions quite some time ago. Sorry if I'm
stealing anyone's thunder.
http://www.svendtofte.com/code/max_width_in_ie/
Regards,
Stuart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandards
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page
does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page
Al Sparber wrote:
>>
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
>>>
>>> With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page does
>>> not work.
>>
>> It seems to work fine for me,
>
> It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page is a mess to
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
With script disabled in IE6, the expression on the above page does
not work.
It seems to work fine for me,
It most certainly does not work. Look closely, the page is a mess to
begin with so it's hard to see.
Al Sparber wrote:
> Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>>
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
>> Says:
>> "The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
>> included via an "expression" hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
>> head. While this
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
"The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an "expression" hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script, the user cannot disa
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
"The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #sizer, and IEwin is
included via an "expression" hidden in a Conditional Comment in the
head. While this is a script, the user cannot disa
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
From: "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
"The upper limit is enforced by a
Al Sparber wrote:
> From: "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I'm not sure about that.
>> I believe it still works with script disabled.
>
> It doesn't.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/jello-piefecta-clean.html
Says:
"The upper limit is enforced by a max-width on #size
Michael Wilson wrote:
Al Sparber wrote:
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against automated
checking, but technically you are using invalid code
T
Al Sparber wrote:
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against automated
checking, but technically you are using invalid code
That's a real stretch
From: "Lachlan Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Would something like this be appropriate and still validate?
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence
ignores the content. So, your page will validate against a
From: "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabled.
It doesn't. But if script is used to enhance a web page, rather than
the page being dependent on the script, it is not an issue - and very
few people run IE with script disable
Paul
Thankyou for that, it will be very usefull for a couple of projects I have.
> The current test URL is here - http://d81314.i50.quadrahosting.com.au/ -
One word of warning in IE6 at about 960px wide browser window the
centre content drops below the calendar. It only happens in a small
range s
o.k., so how do you go about setting both max- and min-width at the same time?
I tried:
width:80%;
max-width:600px;
min-width:400px;
width:expression(((document.documentElement.clientWidth)) < 500 ?
'400px' : '80%');
width:expression(((document.documentEl
Thierry Koblentz skrev:
Ian Rifkin wrote:
The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
(inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe
Paul Noone wrote:
> So we're very close here then?
Pretty close :)
> Would something like this be appropriate and still validate?
Conditional comments only validate in the sense that the validator
doesn't recognise them as anything other than comments and hence ignores
the content. So, your pag
e the centre column's
content disapperas/drops from view. I've applied various new wave clearing
solutions but it still does it. Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Friday, 21 October 2005 3:46 PM
To: ws
Thanks guys, that answers all my questions.
@ Paul: Could you please give a link to your website where this is now
working? Also, I'd like to add this as a resource to Liquid Designs.
Will you be writing something on this, or could I just write something
and give the credit to you?
--
C Montoya
r
Ian Rifkin wrote:
> The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
> actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
> (inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
I'm not sure about that.
I believe it still works with script disabl
So we're very close here then?
Would something like this be appropriate and still validate?
-Original Message-
From: Lachlan Hardy
G'day Christian,
The expression code that Paul used (and which I often use myself) is
proprietary to Microsoft. IE allows some Javascript within CSS files
Christian Montoya wrote:
> OK, now you have me very excited. Does this go in external
> stylesheets? How's the support for IE browsers? Other browsers? Tell
> me more.
G'day Christian,
The expression code that Paul used (and which I often use myself) is
proprietary to Microsoft. IE allows some
The min-width was set using CSS expressions which only works in IE. It
actually is javascript that makes it work, but it goes in the CSS
(inline or external stylesheet). It won't work if javascript is off.
It can work for min width or max width.
Other browsers (mozilla based) don't recognize t
It seems to work from IE 5.x up. Not in the Mac version but what does? ;)
I've just added the line to the page container style in my primary
stylesheet.
Works like a treat and doesn't appear to affect Mozilla/Firefox. Haven't
checked other browsers but am eager for feedback.
-Original Messag
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Paul Noone
> Sent: Friday, 21 October 2005 2:10 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Set min-width using DOM
>
> Hi,
>
> I know the jello tchnique and others have more or less effectively dealt
> with the problem of m
[update]
If I can tear people away form the complex form issue for a moment... ;)
The expression does work, the syntax was simply wrong as a result of copying
the text from a website. I had ` instead of '. Doh!
So, for those who want an IE min-width solution, this is your baby IMO. One
line of c
32 matches
Mail list logo
