d
out was annoying.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 10:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards compliant content management system.
Ned,
I'm about to sign a contract on We
www.xstandard.com may be of help to you, its not A CMS, but a input area
which generates valid XHTML and uses CSS for styling so It can be
integrated into a CMS
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development & IT consultancy
Ned Lukies wrote:
A problem that has popped up for me a number
On 01/06/2004, at 2:22 PM, Ned Lukies wrote:
Has anyone come up with some solutions for helping the client maintain
their
own content while still retaining standards compliance?
a) Macromedia Contribute could work out fine for small stuff, and is
really the only GUI option I'd consider -- everyth
Ned,
I'm about to sign a contract on Wednesday and the client wants a CMS. I've
been looking into "Contribute" by Macromedia, and it maintains that
designers can "Lock down site design, code, and permissions to protect
your website."
Although my review has just begun, my initial findings is compa
I'm in the same situation only one step further forward. I'm considering
either using the XHTML compliant Editor that is available although it looks
a little unpredictable or changing my Content management system to allow
the user to build up pages from components.
Ie: they will select a component
We have a CMS list for this subject. Please (subscribe if you're not already
on it and) move it over there for any further discussion.
For details, see: http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/resource131.cfm
Regards,
Peter
*
The discussion list for
Ned,
Have you tried Macromedia's Contribute? Good for static pages, with a
web browser metaphor.
-Hugh Todd
Has anyone come up with some solutions for helping the client maintain
their
own content while still retaining standards compliance?
*
T
