> Then perhaps you would care to explain why this document:
>
> http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest2.htm
>
> activates standards mode, when the table you've linked to suggests
> that it should be in quirks mode?
Table clearly shows, that this page should activate standards mode.
It is the last line, „
To counter my point and support yours though, setting a width on the P
tag also makes the elements clickable. Which does seem to suggest that
the P tag extends vertically down further than its border suggests it
does.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Breton Slivka wrote:
> So you think that there'
So you think that there's an invisible part to the aragraph that is
not outlined by the border? Kind of makes the border 1px approach to
development kind of useless in IE in the face of behavior like this,
don't you think? But I still don't think this idea quite matches up.
In the broken version, t
> I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've
> updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list,
> which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable,
> disconfirming your conclusions.
Actually, I was agreeing with you that it is a bug
Then perhaps you would care to explain why this document:
http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest2.htm
activates standards mode, when the table you've linked to suggests
that it should be in quirks mode?
for comparison, here's a typical html 4.0 strict doctype:
http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest1.htm
I w
> I'm pretty sure the well observed and documented behavior of IE is
> that WHICH doctype makes absolutely not a lick of difference at all.
This is not correct.
> The only thing it looks for is the string of the document, which decides whether it goes into quirksmode or not.
Rendering mode does
Dropping the DOCTYPE declaration appears to fix it...
Breton Slivka wrote:
I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've
updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list,
which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable,
disconfirming
Sorry, I misread your message, looks like this is not the problem.
Please disregard.
Robert Turner wrote:
Try adding borders to all block level elements (ie. , etc).
Firebug does this for you in Firefox, but you'll need to do it
manually for IE. To make it much more obvious, set a background
Try adding borders to all block level elements (ie. , etc).
Firebug does this for you in Firefox, but you'll need to do it manually
for IE. To make it much more obvious, set a background color too (eg. p,
div {background-color: #00f;} ). If there are unclickable links then
chances are somethin
I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've
updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list,
which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable,
disconfirming your conclusions.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Kepler Gelotte
wrote:
>
> On that page, you will see an italic letter v on the left hand side of
> the screen, and a "view cart" link on the right hand side which is NOT
> clickable, but which should be clickable.
The issue does not seem to be related to standards. I cleaned up the code
and the problem persists. The caus
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Taylor wrote:
> I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues
> beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like:
>
> "http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd";>
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
>
> Your saying t
: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.
Joe is right, you got alot of tags unclosed and you're switch from HTML to
XHTML style tags. Pick one, and use the validator!
You'll see a pretty much bug free site in no time.
_
From: li...@w
r
Sent: 04 June 2009 02:38
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] The weirdest IE bug I've ever encountered.
I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues
beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like:
http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/lo
I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues
beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like:
"http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/loose.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Your saying the DocType is HTML 4.01 Transitional, but then you're
linking to
15 matches
Mail list logo