Anders Nawroth wrote:
Chris Stratford wrote:
just have the header point to: styles/sheet.css
Use /styles/sheet.css.
In most cases that's probably best. However, another option is to use
mod_rewrite to also adjust the CSS location. It's even possible to have
only one main file which takes
You may recall we conducted a quick poll gauge the feeling of Melbourne members as to
how frequently we would like to meet.
Well we weren't exactly over run with replies but those that did mostly favoured 4
weeks, though many could live with six.
I've discussed this with David, and we feel that
Lee Roberts wrote:
That is what I use. Of course the directories and filenames are
different, but you get the idea.
I often just use a base tag.
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_base.asp
Although, I very rarely see other people use it. Since it has come up,
why don't folks use this tag?
Lachlan
I use links relative to the root directory everywhere for example:
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css media=print href=/print.css/
link rel=shortcut icon href=/favicon.ico /
div id=mainnav
ul
lia href=/Home/a/li
lia href=/portfolio.phpPortfolio/a/li
lia href=/article/Articles/a/li
A gallery of CSS websites, useful for noting trends in CSS design
http://www.cssvault.com/gallery.php
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
Neerav wrote:
If you use a base tag than you cant run a local mirror of sites for
testing. Eg: I run Apache/PHP/MySQL etc on my pc to make sure everything
is running fine before I upload to the clients FTP server
Sure, you can. I just generate the base tag
I was thinking there must be some other
Base is a good tag, but in my opinion it has worn out
its usefulness.
The only reason one might find it good now is if one has
their site stolen. Rookies that steal your web site won't
know what base is and would therefore end up linking
into your site.
When we started HTML development years
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:00:59 -0500, Lee Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Base is a good tag, but in my opinion it has worn out
its usefulness.
I use the base tag for my Fusebox/ColdFusion sites, which use SES
(search engine safe) style URLS - ie, the urls are in the format
Kay Smoljak wrote:
I use the base tag for my Fusebox/ColdFusion sites, which use SES
(search engine safe) style URLS - ie, the urls are in the format
www.example.com/foo/bar/ rather than www.example.com?foo=bar. In this
situation, the relative links no longer make sense, which is where the
base
