Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a look
at this:
style
.readmoreTitle { display: none; }
/style
a href=# title=Read more: [title]Read morespan
class=readmoreTitle: [title]/span/a
Would this be an option?
Edwart Visser
Designer
Wisdom TMLC
T + 31
Yes it is fixed already. I have send a mail with additional subject *SOLVED*
to the list.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Jason Foss
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. November 2004 05:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [WSG] Problems
Edwart Visser wrote:
Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a look
at this:
style
.readmoreTitle { display: none; }
/style
Unfortunately not a viable option, as some screenreaders then completely
miss out on it.
hi,
one has to hit ENTER/RETURN in IE6 for access keys to work. keying in
the access key merely puts focus on the link, but does not automagically
activate it as in, say the Fox.
--
Thorsten
**
The discussion list for
Hi,
Could someone tell me what to do to get validated an XHTML page with a
QuickTime video embedded?
Here is the page :
http://www.temposi.com/index.html
An Here are the validation errors that I get :
Line 110, column 23: there is no attribute height
Line 110, column 35: there is no attribute
style
.readmoreTitle { text-indent: -9000px; }
/style
might be better for screen readers.
Edwart Visser wrote:
Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a look
at this:
style
.readmoreTitle { display: none; }
/style
a href=# title=Read more: [title]Read
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Edwart Visser
Sent: Thursday, 4 November 2004 7:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] links with same names
Ok, but then there is the answer, isnt it?
Take a look at this example...
Hi,
I'm working on a new 3 page website at
www.zebragraphics.co.uk/startwell/index.html, (css is at
www.zebragraphics.co.uk/startwell/styles/first.css).
The container and wrapper divs should be centred in the browser window
and that's how it looks in IE5, Safari, Firefox and Camino on the Mac,
IE doesn't support auto margins for centering. Instead, use the following
trick: add text-align: centre to body, and (to neutralise the effect on
the rest of the page itself), add text-align: left to #container.
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:37:19 -, Patrick Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IE doesn't support auto margins for centering.
IE6 does support this method in standards mode.
Regards,
Rimantas
**
The discussion list for
From: Rimantas Liubertas
IE6 does support this method in standards mode.
You learn something new every day...
Cheers,
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
**
The
In my style sheet
for www.victorianixon.com I have used
a wrapper and horizon technique to get the design to sit in the
middle (vertical and horizontal) of the screen but the background image I've
applied to the wrapper is exactly where I want it to be in IE but in
Firefox the background
Hi,
I have another site with a small problem I'm unable to solve. I've put
an 'announcement box' near the foot of the page at
www.ragamuffinbridal.co.uk (css at
www.ragamuffinbridal.co.uk/styles/first.css).
The text looks vertically centred in IE5, Firefox, Safari and Camino on
the Mac, but
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback, if you don't mind. I'm aware that the forums link
doesn't go where it should, but everything else should be all good. I'm
a minimalistic designer, so be prepared for no bells and whistles.
Hi,
Another problem with www.ragamuffinbridal.co.uk (css at
www.ragamuffinbridal.co.uk/styles/first.css).
In the navigation list, there's no left-hand margin on the Home
button in IE6 PC, (seems fine on Mac browsers) and it's throwing out
the alignment with the right-hand side of the banner.
john wrote:
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback, if you don't mind. I'm aware that the forums link
doesn't go where it should, but everything else should be all good.
I'm a minimalistic designer, so be prepared for no bells and whistles.
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
john wrote:
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback, if you don't mind.
...
http://www.drzeus.net/redesign/cslewis/
Your thoughts (and encouragement *grin*) are most appreciated.
Your page is nice and well worth a visit (that's the well earned
I guess that some people here will also be members of the Webaim
Discussion List. Well, I am - but it seems to have stopped working
for me.
Is it just my subscription that it broken?
--
Iain
**
The discussion list for
I also enjoyed the overall design of the site. I feel that the font size
and color choices are pleasing and easy to read (especially the
navigation.) But that being said, no one grows as a web designer from
compliments, so just a few nitpicks for you (out of love, of course ;-)
Your quote section
In the navigation list, there's no left-hand margin on the Home
button in IE6 PC,
#container {
background-color: white;
margin: 10px auto;
border: solid 1px #ae1939;
width: 778px;
\width: 798px;
*w\idth: 778px;*
text-align: left;
}
It's the width constraint of your
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback, if you don't mind.
Looks good in all the winxp browsers.
One thing you should fix - an id has to be unique and you use the same
id twice, so it's not valid code.
div id=sidemenu
ul id=sidemenu
--
Susan
looks good on safari browser too
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:23:43 -0800, Susan R. Grossman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback, if you don't mind.
Looks good in all the winxp browsers.
One thing you should fix - an id has
I find the inconsistant use of thumbnails in the category div 's
(watercolors, etc.) that are href's that change a picture and then
the same sized thumbnails in the left and right containers with the
border frame being the only visible dif, yet they aren't clickable
confusing and not very usable.
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback, if you don't mind.
http://www.drzeus.net/redesign/cslewis/
I clicked on the forums link and get a site directory instead of a page,
that shouldn't happen right?
As I said, I'm aware that the forums don't go to where they should. :)
Thanks for the feedback.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
Zulema wrote:
I'm about 95% done with my first XHTML/CSS site, and I'd like to get
some feedback,
I would like to get comments on my site.
http://bennieshepherd.com
Thanks guys...
--
Get Firefox Browser
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=6908amp;t=58
Bennie's MIDI Page
http://bennieshepherd.com/
Athens, Georgia, Relay For Life
http://www.athensrelay.net/
Montrose, Colorado, Relay
How do you make an Image shadow using CSS like that on DeviantArt...?
--
Best Regards,
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
I would like to get comments on my site.
It looks fine in winXp ie and firefox, the code is all valid and
accessible (though it could use a language declaration) on most of
the pages. The mailing list page which needs to be set up with labels
at the least and so does the search page, etcd. -
Looks sharp - but doesn't validate. No doctype?? Oh, wait...it's
further down the page, should be right up top before anything else.
Otherwise the validator defaults to HTML 4.01 Transitional, and with
that you have some invalid markup to fix.
Leslie Riggs
Bennie Shepherd wrote:
I would
is this a language declaration? html lang=en xml:lang=en
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
and also not sure what the lables are for the form pages.
I would like to get comments on my site.
It looks fine in winXp ie and firefox, the code is all valid and
accessible (though it could use a
The doc type is at the top of the page and the site validates xhtml strict.
Are you sure you validated the right site? :o)
On 11/4/2004 1:51:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks sharp - but doesn't validate. No doctype?? Oh, wait...it's
further down the page, should be right up top before
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
How do you make an Image shadow using CSS like that on DeviantArt...?
Can't be bothered to decypher dA's CSS, but I strongly suspect they'll
be using one of the following techniques:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssdropshadows/
Hi Bennie,
Nice site. Good to see a change from three column layouts with a banner at
the top! :-)
However, looking at your markup, I see you've got a certain amount of
classitis and divitis! You have, e.g., got lots of li tags, all classed
as menu [ li class=menu]. Could you not incorporate
Hi,
It seems today is check my page day so I wondered if you would like to
check my page too. The products (produkter) is not done yet but the rest
should work fine.
I thought a lot about tab index. Is there any need for them... unless
you want to direct tabbers a certain way round the pages?
And the url?
http://mouseriders.dk/ ?
It seems today is check my page day so I wondered if you would like to
check my page too. The products (produkter) is not done yet but the rest
should work fine.
**
The discussion list for
Wonder where the site is located :o)
On 11/4/2004 2:35:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems today is check my page day so I wondered if you would like to
check my page too. The products (produkter) is not done yet but the rest
should work fine.
I thought a lot about tab index.
Sorry... http://www.mouseriders.dk/
Kim
Bennie Shepherd wrote:
Wonder where the site is located :o)
On 11/4/2004 2:35:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems today is check my page day so I wondered if you would
like to
check my page too. The products (produkter) is not done yet but
russ - maxdesign wrote:
And the url?
http://mouseriders.dk/ ?
Let's pray it's not http://localhost/mysite/test.html
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
I went to the page by clicking your link, using FF, clicked on the
Validator tab in the Web Developer toolbar. Is there a glitch with that
tab?
Leslie Riggs
Bennie Shepherd wrote:
The doc type is at the top of the page and the site validates xhtml
strict.
Are you sure you validated the right
is this a language declaration? html lang=en xml:lang=en
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
Yes -
and also not sure what the lables are for the form pages.
Labels are an accessibility feature. The WSG has an example of an
accessible form at
is this a language declaration? html lang=en xml:lang=en
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
Yes -
and also not sure what the lables are for the form pages.
Labels are an accessibility feature. The WSG has an example of an
accessible form at
Kim Kruse wrote:
[sitecheck on http://www.mouseriders.dk/]
Hi Kim,
It's a clear and easy to navigate site. Some small remarks:
* In my Mozilla, the subheadings are smaller than the copy text. I
assume that is not your intent, but if it is I'd advice against it as
(descending) font-size is a key
Kim Kruse wrote:
Sorry... http://www.mouseriders.dk/ ...
It seems today is check my page day so I wondered if you would
like to check my page too. The products (produkter) is not done
yet but the rest should work fine.
Yes, it does - up to a point.
Looked at the actual content (since I can read
*Since adding the thumbnails in the sidebars *
The iframes flicker jump vertically, in Gecko browsers, when the
thumbnails in the left or right sidebars are hovered.
http://www.dlaakso.com/
The CSS for those thumbnails is embedded.
Style sheets are here:
http://www.dlaakso.com/dal_css/base.css
Iain
You should direct your enquiry to the admins of that list. It's not
relevant to this list.
Regards
James
(admin)
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:24:14 +, Iain Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that some people here will also be members of the Webaim
Discussion List. Well, I am - but
46 matches
Mail list logo
