Do any of these, or any others for that matter, support aural style
sheets?
from that list, emacSpeak only, unless things have changed recently...
Opera 7.60 for Windows has support for voice xml and some aural styles.
The software:
http://snapshot.opera.com
Docs and tutorials:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:33:27 -0500, berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I already found this link. What I was looking for was theory.
I'd heartily recommend the O'Reilly JavaScript: The Definitive
Reference by David Flanagan -- it has a good section on HTML4 events
as well as DOM (Gecko)
I've been slowly chipping away at this site
Site: http://www.blog.lindenlangdon.com
CSS: http://www.blog.lindenlangdon.com/stylesheets/default.css
http://www.blog.lindenlangdon.com/stylesheets/styles.css
Hi All,
I would be grateful for any and all feedback on a redesign I've done for a
site which presents an illustrated novel. Some of it is a weeny bit hybrid,
but (a small amount of flash aside) it all validates as xhtml and
presentational matter is down to an absolute minimum. I have not done
Sorry to cross-post my reply, but:
From: Lauke Patrick
Sent: 08 December 2004 11:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Text email newsletter standard
From: Mike Brown
has anyone come across, or used, the following text email newsletter
standard:
http://www.headstar.com/ten/
Yes, stumbled
Hey everyone.
I keep forgetting and need some clarification on the use of
alt and title and which is most appropriate.
I am using the strict dtd so as far as I understand Im
meant to use alt for links and title for images. Or is it the other way around?
Or both?
Fairly simple
Am Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:06:52 +1100 schrieb Brett Walsh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey everyone.
I keep forgetting and need some clarification on the use of alt and title
and which is most appropriate.
I am using the strict dtd so as far as I understand I'm meant to use alt
for
links and title for
Title: Message
Personally, I tend towards using title for links to give surfers an idea
where the link is taking them. I use both on images. I use the web
developer extension for Firefox on my own site at the moment for highlighting
any links which I have neglected to add a title attribute
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:06:52 +1100, Brett Walsh wrote:
I am using the strict dtd so as far as I understand I'm meant to use alt for
links and title for images. Or is it the other way around? Or both?
The other way around - the alt attribute goes on the img tag, to
provide some information when
ok I will jot that one down. That article at beras street was nice and
helpful.
I was getting confused as the validator was complaining about no alt on
links for strict dtd. Thx all of you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lea de Groot
On 8 Dec 2004, at 12:06, Brett Walsh wrote:
I keep forgetting and need some clarification on the use of alt and
title
and which is most appropriate.
I am using the strict dtd so as far as I understand I'm meant to use
alt for links and title for images. Or is it the other way around? Or
both?
Hello,
My only beef with this site is you seem to have *two* splash pages. One
is bad enough...
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
designer wrote:
Hi All,
I would be grateful for any and all feedback on a redesign I've done for a
site which presents an illustrated novel. Some
No there isn't. But the next release of of OS X will have one built in:
http://www.apple.com/accessibility/voiceover/
Terrence Wood.
Jorge Laranjo wrote:
But i don't know of any screenreader for MAC OS X. Is there any?
--
***
Are
Bob,
Purely from the aesthetics level.
Drop the entire first page - or two - The very first one blinked on my screen for perhaps 3 seconds and was gone. The second was the spinning record. The main window - number three, is where I should land right off - no other pages between me and your main
I know that if you declare the background-color, you also declare the color
(and vice-versa). Is it o.k. to use color: inherit; for the color when
you are declaring the background-color? If not, then what is a good way to
do it?
Thanks!
**
AFAIK it's ok. You can also use transparent if you don't want a
background color.
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-09 8:08 AM, Lee Underwood wrote:
I know that if you declare the background-color, you also declare the
color (and vice-versa). Is it o.k. to use color: inherit; for the
color when you
This probably goes without saying, but I'll ask anyway just in case
it's overlooked:
Can someone who's going to the Wellington meeting tonight please
blog/record happennings so that those of us that can't attend can find
out what went on? Photos if appropriate (or incrimanating) would be
good
Thanks Will, but all those validation errors are because of using Flash -
there is no way to use Flash 'properly' and get the thing to validate (all
the workarounds have problems, as I understand it). Outrageous, but there ye
go! :-)
Thanks for your thoughts.
Tom (and Will) - I will bear all
I've been using the TEN format as a navigation aid for screenreaders in
my Web Design Update Newsletter for over two and a half years now. All
user feedback has been positive.
Some comments from subscribers regarding what they like about the TEN
format:
- Attention to accessible-friendliness
Joseph Lindsay wrote:
This probably goes without saying, but I'll ask anyway just in case
it's overlooked:
Can someone who's going to the Wellington meeting tonight please
blog/record happennings so that those of us that can't attend can find
out what went on? Photos if appropriate (or
I'll put something on my site. It's meant to have a blog there already,
but you know how it is a builder's house, a mechanic's car, a
designers site ;-)
So check in tomorrow at some stage.
http://funkive.com
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-09 8:42 AM, Joseph Lindsay wrote:
This probably goes
Derek Featherstone wrote:
-
What is critical and what is extra is determined by context. In general,
the lower tech the approach, the more accessible it is. If it is in the
content, everyone gets what they need, instead of having to rely on a
tooltip which may or may
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 07:20:56 +1100, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
wrote:
It's good practise to have the title attribute also on images (in addition
to the ALT), as some browsers won't display the ALT Text as a tooltip.
Does that validate? I didn't think title was a valid attribute for the
G'day
It's good practise to have the title attribute also on images (in
addition to the ALT), as some browsers won't display the ALT Text as a
tooltip.
Does that validate? I didn't think title was a valid attribute for the img
tag?
Should do:
From
24 matches
Mail list logo
