Hi all,
We have recently launched http://www.getawayafrica.com/, your comments are
welcome. But would like to know more about if you have any problems with the
site.
Just a note, the client is still inputting content.
Kind Regards
Jacobus van Niekerk
Creative Consultant
Title: Auckland WSG?
Hi Everyone,
I'm moving to Auckland in June, and want to know if a WSG has kicked off there yet? I'd be interested in getting together with other webbys when I move there, away from my little home town in North Queensland. :(
So whoever is from Auckland could you
Any opinions about my contact form at
http://www.bhatt.id.au/contactus.php are appreciated
AFAIK it displays fine in all browsers and even with css off
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
Looks nice, wish I could afford it :-)
The only 2 small problems I see are caused by the standard text size
being too small, so I choose medium size text (in Firefox 1.0 Win 2000
1024x768) and:
1. Making your African Dreams a Reality! is overlapped by Lodges
Hotels
2. Terms Conditions and
Williams, Cara wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So whoever is from Auckland could you holler my way
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I'll probably pick your brains about the
job opportunities over there too.
Hi Cara,
I know there are at least two of us - Peter Asquith and I are working on
getting a meeting together
On Firefox 1.0.2, WinXP, 1024x768 the sample article divs push the footer
div down at normal font size. 2 sizes down and alignment is good but
readability is gone.
Regards
Scott Swabey
General Manager
Lafinboy Productions
:: website design :: website
Hi there.
We have recently launched http://verkehrsanwaelte.de .
I've tested in several pc - browsers and on mac in IE and Safari. The
problem in both is the lack support of min-height.
I need the #container div to stretch on short sites to the bottom of the
browser window. Anybody got an idea,
What I normally do when I want to use min-height is use a css hack to set a
height for IE only. IE will treat the height property in the same way as
min-height was meant to work. But you have to hide the set height from the
other browsers that support min-height.
HTH
-Original Message-
Thanks Scott
Its probably a symptom of the Sample Site and Sample Article being
randomly selected from a number of different choices, each of which have
different character lengths!
Therefore I've increased the footers top padding a bit, and reduced the
length of some of the longer Sample Site
You could use the IE hack:
height: expression(window.height);
or simply:
height: expression(500px);
only IE will execute that line :)
it will not validate though.
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
What I normally do when I want to use min-height is use a css hack to set a
height for IE
What I normally do when I want to use min-height is use a css hack to set a
height for IE only. IE will treat the height property in the same way as
min-height was meant to work. But you have to hide the set height from the
other browsers that support min-height.
HTH
If you look at the
Great Site
Everything works OK.
regards
---
Vision.To Design
Femi Hasani
www.vision.to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+46 736 009 555
Sweden / Suedi
www.coder24.com
www.wowdev.com
---
- Original Message -
Matthias Lotze schrieb:
I've tested in several pc - browsers and on mac in IE and Safari. The
Maybe these two articles provide you with the necessary solution:
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2004/09/16/minheight_fi/
http://www.greywyvern.com/code/min-height-hack.html
--
Greetings from Germany,
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:03:20 +0100, info [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also said that adding:
-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet --
at the beginning of the file disables this behaviour.
I think you meant:
!-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet --
^ it was missing the exclamation point. :D
I will wish to use external fonts
(noncommon to pcs, obtained through server by the pagina Web) for my
designs with css, somebody knows like doing it?
Thanks.
I looked into this once. It was a little over my head, but maybe it
can help you -
http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol3/css_no15.htm
--Zachary
On Apr 6, 2005 10:31 AM, tomcask o_o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will wish to use external fonts (noncommon to pcs, obtained through
server by the
Hi
Here's my bit of advice.
It's very likely that you will add another form to a web site in the future.
For that reason, I'd remove the selectors and define a general form style,
then add only the particular styles for that particular form. Do you really
need to define your font families? Is the
It hurts, i thought that not i have so many problems ;( ;(
thanks
Hopkins Programming wrote:
I looked into this once. It was a little over my head, but maybe it
can help you -
http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol3/css_no15.htm
--Zachary
On Apr 6, 2005 10:31 AM, tomcask o_o [EMAIL
The colour contrast for the active input field (i.e. black on red) is low
and therefore difficult to read.
Maybe white on red or black on a much lighter bgd colour.
Also a single h2 in the page.
If only one heading is used then it should be h1.
Regards,
Rob
Robert Reed
Instead of this:
ul
liitem/li
liitem/li
liitem/li
/ul
try this:
ul
liitem/li
liitem/li
liitem/li
/ul
This markup style leaves one list item per row to ease human readability,
but effectively eliminates all
Maybe you've already thought of this, but the list is useless without
css support. I'd suggest putting spanlist item name/span in the list
items and then do something like
|li a span {display:none}|
Thanks for the reminder. I did not think about this at all.
In IE, this doesn't seem to be
Hi everyone,
I got this cool roundbox code from http://www.redmelon.net/tstme/4corners
and am trying to adapt it for use in a more complex wrapper with a masthead,
body and footer...But im havin a proble with one of the side drop shadows.
check out the page at
Hi Tee,
I saw the imageless example to, but it dosn't work in ie5 mac.
Even though some people don't develop for this browser anymore i still use
it somethimes.
Also the roundbox im working on has a drop shadow on either side.
thank you
-Kevin
Hi Kevin, I found this nifty corners the other
and am trying to adapt it for use in a more complex wrapper with a masthead
I know I'm not answering directly to your problem, but take a look at
ALA: Mountaintop Corners
http://alistapart.com/articles/mountaintop/
ALA: CSS Design: Creating Custom Corners Borders
tee wrote:
For example:
The first button link:
#siteOption #homeLink {
background: url(images/bigmenu/big5_home.jpg) no-repeat;
height: 28px; width: 150px;
}
And the span has to be here so that it work in IE but creates 2 pixel white
space.
#siteOption #homeLink span {display: none; }
Title: Message
Hi, Have a page that
seems to be lining up fine everywhere I am checking( Opera, Firefox, IE ),
validates fine but is a little off on a MAC, seems like a margin is pushing the
grey box in the middle, towards the right. Sorry no screenshot but the page is
I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are
spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites.
While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the
same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese,
and here a
tee wrote:
I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are
spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites.
While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the
same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese,
and
Access keys are troublesome. If you use them, and I think they can be very
helpful, you should limit them to the most important, most requested pages,
and not every page on the site.
There have been many conversations about access keys on this list, you may
want to look through the archives for
Hi Tee,
I don't think you should use access keys for all pages. Only the most
important pages as sitemaps, search etc.
Kim
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
tee wrote:
In this case there are only 36 access
keys we can use. How can one solves this dilemma if a site involve
with more than 36 pages?
It might be enough to use accesskeys on your main navigation (home,about
etc).
I've not seen your page, so I don't know if the MainNav includes more than
tee wrote:
I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are
spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites.
While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the
same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese,
and
Good evening tee,
It was foretold that on 6-4-2005 @ 12:35:59 GMT-0700 (which was
21:35:59 where I live) tee would write:
snipped a bit
t I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are
t spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites.
Maybe you
Carl Reynolds wrote:
tee wrote:
I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although
opinion are
spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites.
While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use
the
same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and
Carl Reynolds wrote:
How long is your access key?
If the access key is only one letter long then there are only 36
possible keys,
if it is two letters long there are 36*36 = 1296 possible keys,
if three letter 36*36*36 = 46656 possible keys,
etc.
Carl.
Fun, fun, I doubt anyone wants to mash
Carl Reynolds wrote:
How long is your access key?
If the access key is only one letter long then there are only 36
possible keys,
if it is two letters long there are 36*36 = 1296 possible keys,
if three letter 36*36*36 = 46656 possible keys,
etc.
Carl.
Fun, fun, I doubt anyone want to mash
Carl Reynolds wrote:
How long is your access key?
If the access key is only one letter long then there are only 36
possible keys,
if it is two letters long there are 36*36 = 1296 possible keys,
if three letter 36*36*36 = 46656 possible keys,
etc.
You can't have multi-letter accesskeys...
--
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:23:50 +0100, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Have a page that seems to be lining up fine everywhere I am checking
( Opera, Firefox, IE ), validates fine but is a little off on a MAC,
And PC displays fine? That must be endian-related problem ;)
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
On 7 Apr 2005, at 4:23 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi, Have a page that seems to be lining up fine everywhere I am
checking ( Opera, Firefox, IE ), validates fine but is a little off on
a MAC, seems like a margin is pushing the grey box in the middle,
towards the right. Sorry no screenshot but the page is
I'd add http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2004/04/min-height-in-safari
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
tee wrote:
In this case there are only 36 access
keys we can use. How can one solves this dilemma if a site involve
with more than 36 pages?
It might be enough to use accesskeys on your main navigation (home,about
etc).
My site is fine. I don't need 36 access keys :) It has three
Thanks for the links, Luc. I sure will read them. By the way, are you the
same Luc I recently known? How do you pronounce your name if I may ask.
tee
Good evening tee,
It was foretold that on 6-4-2005 @ 12:35:59 GMT-0700 (which was
21:35:59 where I live) tee would write:
snipped a
Hello tee,
It was foretold that on 7-4-2005 @ 16:50:48 GMT-0700 (which was
1:50:48 where I live) tee would write:
snipped a bit
t By the way, are you the same Luc I recently known?
Yes, the one and only ;-)
t How do you pronounce your name if I may ask.
For native english speakers
The next meeting for the Brisbane WSG Group is Tuesday, April 12. Thats
next week!
Anyone in Brisbane who hasn't already received a notice, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are planning to attend we'd once again like an RSVP so we can do
the catering.
Venue:
This month we are trialing
44 matches
Mail list logo
