Hello,
besides the warning that the link will open in a new window, also make sure
that the pop-up will work if JavaScript is disabled or not supported by
assistive technologies. The way to do that is:
a href=help.htm target=_blank
onClick=javascript:openNewWindow(this.href); return false;
I have left RMIT TestLab, and your email has been forwarded on to Steven Turvey
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
If you need to contact RMIT TestLab in the future, please email Steve above or
alternatively ring him on (03) 9925 6018.
**
The discussion
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:44:24 +0100, Gerard Copinga
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a href=help.htm target=_blank
onClick=javascript:openNewWindow(this.href); return false;
title=opens in new windowHelp/a
Why do you put *useless* javascript: *label* inside onclick handler?
--
regards, Kornel
You might find this useful:
http://www.accessify.com/tutorials/the-perfect-pop-up.asp
Prabhath
http://nidahas.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:04:39 +0100, Prabhath Sirisena [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You might find this useful:
http://www.accessify.com/tutorials/the-perfect-pop-up.asp
This popup is imperfect.
In examples there is always return false;.
It should be return !window.open(..);
It uses inline JavaScript -
Kornel Lesi?ski wrote:
It uses inline JavaScript - event handlers should be assigned via DOM.
As an example, you could use a class to indicate which links should
open in a new window:
a href=http://www.example.com/; class=popupvisit the site/a
Then in an external JavaScript file, you could have
Jeremy Keith
lnks[i].onkeypress = lnks[i].onclick;
I'd advise against assigning an onkeypress. In some
browsers (Moz), even a TAB is (rightly) seen as a keypress.
An onkeypress on a link makes it effectively impossible to
tab past the link without triggering the behaviour.
All major current
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a standards-based redesign of a local schools
website and I would like to add some kind of calendar to it.
Their current one is just a massive (ugly) table, coded in Frontpage
tag-soup (116kb of code no less!):
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:16:12 +0100, Jeremy Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2) If the link has a class of popup:
1) add an onlick behaviour
2) cancel the default action
3) make onkeypress do the same thing.
No, don't use onkeypress.
lnks[i].onclick =
check this one out, youd have to modify it to see the whole year
http://veerle.duoh.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
Gerard Copinga wrote:
Hello,
a href=help.htm target=_blank
onClick=javascript:openNewWindow(this.href); return false;
title=opens in new windowHelp/a
As a side note: using _blank as the value of the target attribute is not a
good idea unless the designer wants a *new* window to open each time
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:24:28 +0100, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
a href=help.htm target=_blank
onClick=javascript:openNewWindow(this.href); return false;
title=opens in new windowHelp/a
As a side note: using _blank as the value of the target attribute is
not a good idea unless
Kornel Lesinski
And what about what _user_ wants?
For me there is nothing more annoying that page with links to
screenshots
or faq entries that all stubbornly open in the same window
and don't let
me see more than one of them at once.
But for every user that thinks like you
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
And what about what _user_ wants?
For me there is nothing more annoying that page with links to
screenshots or faq entries that all stubbornly open in the same
window and don't let me see more than one of them at once.
IMHO, this technique gives some control to the user
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
IMHO, this technique gives some control to the user since it is still
possible for her to open such links in new windows (i.e. Right-click Open
Link in New Window (or Tab)).
Using _blank leaves her with no choice.
Even if a link *has* _blank, you can use the right click
Is there a way to stretch an element to be 100% height of the viewport?
Also what is the best way to create a footer, which is at the foot at the
page no matter the height of the viewport, but below and not overlapping any
other elements?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
No virus found in this outgoing
Stevio wrote:
Is there a way to stretch an element to be 100% height of the viewport?
An ugly hack, but my pixel pushing experiment may provide a starting point
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/49/
--
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.):
What's going on here is that all form elements, which includes
fieldsets and labels, are replaced elements, which by the letter of
the W3C specs, are not required to honor direct CSS styling. IE's ties
into the operating system actually helps it here because IE simply
exposes all the styling
tee wrote:
Sorry, realized I got the url wrong. Here is the right one:
http://www.clients.lotusseeds.com/catering_new.html
Simple fix:
#intro {line-height: 0;}
Note also: LOCATION is too high up in Opera. Some adjustments needed
to top of that list.
regards
Georg
--
Hi Georg,
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Even if a link *has* _blank, you can use the right click option.
I know that ;-)
My point is that setting the target attribute's value to WhatEverName
gives the user a *choice*.
It allows him to either open these links in new windows or in the *original
new one*. With
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Even if a link *has* _blank, you can use the right click option.
I know that ;-)
My point is
Ah ... oops ... I see what you mean now (makes mental note to read a
message first before replying).
P :)
--
Patrick H. Lauke
Ah, the possibilities...?
http://biocandy.dk/test.html
And it works in Opera8, too!
Sorry. I think temptation exceeds my better judgement.
Rgards,
David
--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
thats pretty neat! it says it doesn't work in ie, but i see the
skeleton in it... strange.
David Laakso wrote:
Ah, the possibilities...?
http://biocandy.dk/test.html
And it works in Opera8, too!
Sorry. I think temptation exceeds my better judgement.
Rgards,
David
Ah that is cool...very nice.
--- David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, the possibilities...?
http://biocandy.dk/test.html
And it works in Opera8, too!
Sorry. I think temptation exceeds my better judgement.
Rgards,
David
--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Same effect as the diver in this css zen garden entry:
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenocean.css
Very nice indeed.
One thing - is the character meant to look like a man with that huge
dongle between its legs?
Or am I just not noticing something here???
This is my first attempt at a XHTML1.0/Strict website, and thus far things
are going okay. The layout is displayed perfectly in Firefox and IE6 gets
close enough.
However, I appear to have less luck with one page on my site. When I move my
mouse over the hyperlinks, the divs appear to be
Jeroen Verburgh wrote:
. When I move my
mouse over the hyperlinks, the divs appear to be shrinking a little.
http://81.69.108.105/?start
No time to test, but at a quick glance I'd say your problem stems from
defining no border for links, and then defining a border-bottom for
a:hover. This new
Jeroen Verburgh wrote:
This is my first attempt at a XHTML1.0/Strict website, and thus far
things are going okay. The layout is displayed perfectly in Firefox
and IE6 gets close enough.
However, I appear to have less luck with one page on my site. When I
move my mouse over the hyperlinks, the divs
Hi I am sure many people have encountered similar problem with float in IE,
here I am, fighting with it in the last three hours still can't get it fix.
My problem also that I can't tell whether it's double float margin bug or
something else.
http://clients.lotusseeds.com/menus_1_new.html
change ``border: 0;'' to ``border: 1px #fff solid;''
I've just tried this suggestion, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to work.
I'm not really sure it has anything to do with the contents of the floating
divs, because none of them move around. When I move my mouse over a
hyperlink, then all
Most blogs that use wordpress before 1.5 have a pretty good web
standards calender in the navbar by default. eg:
http://www.accessibility1st.com.au/
this would be a good place to start
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Need a Sydney based web standards contractor? You need my services.
Hi,
You could check my version also. It is JavaScript based calendar with
heaps of options. Fully CSS supported. Could be inline or pop-up.
http://siter.com.au/dmitry/cal.html
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Baranovskiy
**
The discussion list for
Peter Ottery wrote:
1) I'm curious if the use of an asterix to indicate a required field,
and the way I've done it, is ok accessibility-wise or if theres
anything else i could/should do...?
G'day Pete
I've recently undertaken the same work myself. I'm beginning to
undertake a very OO approach to
very proud to say the new mycareer site launched today:
http://mycareer.com.au/
its the next major site from the Fairfax Digital network to take on css
layout as part of a redesign. the site gets hundreds of thousands of
visitors a month and is one of australias largest job ad websites.
check it
Peter
Just curious to know what the many lines of CDATA code achieve and the
reason for putting them inline?
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Need a Sydney based web standards contractor? You need my services.
Recent projects for Glassonion, Freshweb, Cogentis, Ceneka ...
G'day
Peter Ottery wrote:
very proud to say the new mycareer site launched today:
http://mycareer.com.au/
css was a huge part of the redesign (which also overhauled some of the
information architecture).
all the developers were keen on the benefits and the business people love
the agility of
36 matches
Mail list logo
