Hey List,
Just a question - I am using a XHTML 1.1 Strict DTD.
It seems that you cannot giveform elements or anchor elements a "name"
this causes a few issues...
#1 - anchors - when I have a SKIP TO CONTENT link.
It doesn't like the NAME I have given the ...
Isn't this the only *proper* way of an
Just a question - I am using a XHTML 1.1 Strict DTD.
1.1 doesn't diverse between strict and others. There is just one 1.1 spec.
It seems that you cannot giveform elements or anchor elements a "name"
this causes a few issues...
Not exactly...
#1 - anchors - when I have a SKIP TO CONTENT link.
It do
Chris Stratford wrote:
Just a question - I am using a XHTML 1.1 Strict DTD.
It seems that you cannot giveform elements or anchor elements a "name"
this causes a few issues...
Form elements, of course you can. Anchors, no.
#1 - anchors - when I have a SKIP TO CONTENT link.
It doesn't like the NAME
Ahh thanks guys!
Sorry I did make a few mistakes when typing that up :S
Some of that I did know, but just mistyped when I sent it.
Sorry :(
but I definatly have been sent in the right direction :)
Thanks guys!
Appreciate it!
- Chris
Chris Stratford wrote:
Hey List,
Just a question - I am using a XH
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> The proper way in XHTML is using fragment identifiers: giving an ID to
> an element, and linking to that, e.g.
> go to content
>
I've found that using "id" instead of "name" for anchors (including a href
attribute) creates an accessibility issue since some browsers (at l
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I've found that using "id" instead of "name" for anchors (including a href
attribute) creates an accessibility issue since some browsers (at least
MSIE) find the location, but are unable to keep track of the link sequence
re: tabbing navigation.
I posted a message a while ba
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> I found that, even when using NAME, IE (particularly IE6/SP2 on
> WinXP/SP2) can exhibit this same behaviour of "forgetting" the right
> tab order. In fact, I just created a super simple page where my IE
> (version and OS as above) just does that
> http://dev.splintered.co
On 14-May-05 13:47, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> Chris Stratford wrote:
>
>> #1 - anchors - when I have a SKIP TO CONTENT link. It doesn't like
>> the NAME I have given the ... Isn't this the only *proper* way
>> of anchoring inside the page???
>
> The proper way in XHTML is using fragment identifi
Hi Thomas,
On 5/15/05, Thomas Ditmars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14-May-05 13:47, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> > go to content
> > ...
> > ...
> Does this also apply to HTML 4.01 Strict?
> I guess my actual question is: "What is the proper way of coding
> '#anchor-name' links in HTML 4.01 Stric