Tee,
You've got the wrong selector. Use:
strong
{
font: 1em bold #369 Arial, San Serif
text-transform: uppercase;
text-decoration: none;
}
Or consult the SelectORacle:
http://penguin.theopalgroup.com/cgi-bin/css3explainer/selectoracle.py
Thanks,
Tatham Oddie
Fuel Advance -
You're also missing a semi-colon after San Serif =)
- carter
On 6/26/05, Tatham Oddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee,You've got the wrong selector. Use:strong{ font: 1em bold #369 Arial, San Serif
text-transform: uppercase; text-decoration: none;}Or consult the
Oops.. Typo error. I do have the semi-colon is in my css file.
Maybe I got the concept wrong?! I don't want it as Type selector but span
CLASS.
In my html, it goes like this:
div id=confuse
pspan class=strongStrong/strong is bold/p
/div
And css
.strong {}
Tell me I got it all wrong?
Never mind, I got it figure out. The #369 color shouldn't stay with 'font:'
Sorry for the confusion.
tee
From: tee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:03:13 -0700
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] 'strong' as class name
Maybe I
Hi tee,
.strong {
font: 1em bold #369 Arial, San Serif
text-transform: uppercase;
text-decoration: none;}
The font shorthand doesn't include a color property. Your rule should
look like this:
.strong {
color: #369;
font: bold 1em Arial, sans-serif;
text-transform:
Thank you Andy, for the link and reminder.
Note that the second font family is 'sans-serif' (with an 's' and hyphen).
Should be:
pspan class=strongStrong/span is bold/p
They are correct in my files. I should have paid more attention in typing
when posting question to the list so to prevent
Hi,
On this page http://mouseriders.dk/esrum/test.htm I have some sort of
problem in FF and other Gecko browsers.
The images just don't show up unless I scroll the page, mouseover the
links or reload the page. Does anybody know why?
I would really appreciate some help as I have no idea
All images load just fine using the following:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414
Firefox/1.0.3 and Windows XP Pro
I am located in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA and it is Sunday, June 26, 2005, 3:12
pm EST..
HTH,
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Kim Kruse
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply. Perhaps I would a great idea to mention it's the
images in the navbar below the header image.
Do they still show?
Kim
Jeff D. Reid wrote:
All images load just fine using the following:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7)
Hi,
After reading this most informative article:
http://juicystudio.com/article/div-mania.php
My anger with MS, particularly IE, deluged again. So I ask has this
browser moved from the dark ages, allowing use of the following:
Child Selectors
Adjacent Sibling Selectors
Attribute Selectors
Kim,
I see what you're talking about. When the page first loaded for me
(Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8)
Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4 (ax)), I saw images for only the first 2
navigation buttons. When I clicked away to another application and then
came back, they
Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi,
On this page http://mouseriders.dk/esrum/test.htm I have some sort of
problem in FF and other Gecko browsers.
The images just don't show up unless I scroll the page, mouseover the
links or reload the page. Does anybody know why?
The page looks the same in FF-1.0.4
Here is a listing of the image file names I see: (from top of page to
bottom)
vinter_header.jpg
quickmap.gif
row of 6 horzontal nav bar mouseovers
aktivitet.gif
aktivitetsmenu.gif (in right sidebar)
colum of 4 javascript links w/small preceding graphic
rightsidetest.jpg
rightsidetest1.jpg
Hi tee,
I still think the strong tag is the way to go for you.
In your example you have inline text that you want to make bold and a diff
colour and font.
This *shounds* like you want to strongly emphasis that text. Why not use the
strong element to do it?
You can still apply your styles:
Chris Kennon wrote:
My anger with MS, particularly IE, deluged again. So I ask has this
browser moved from the dark ages, allowing use of the following:
Child Selectors
Adjacent Sibling Selectors
Attribute Selectors
As it stands now, they might add them to a future release, though I
think
I hate to be a pedant but descendant selectors will return much better
results.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nick Gleitzman
Sent: Saturday, 25 June 2005 7:21 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Picky, picky, picky
On
I was working on a site that has 4 absolute divs for two png images, a left
column and a right column for menu. The two images work fine and the left
column seems working fine except it doesn't stay where I want it to be,
however the right column menu, links and hover are not working at all.
This
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:12:57 +0100, Phil Baines wrote:
... I have come across a javascript problem. The javascript used on
the site allows subcategories to be closed, and clicked
open/closed. This worked wonders in Firefox, IE6 and IE5.5
(Although my cursor:pointer; isn’t right in IE5).
But
Guys
/ girls,
Im
having some problems with the vertical positioning on www.whatcanido.com.au. Basically the
content area is restricted to a maximum height of 600px, and after that I want
it be vertically centred on the page. Im aware of numerous ways to do
this (implemented it on
The site looks fine under IE6 on my PC. Nice job.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of tee
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2005 12:19 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Absolute position problem in IE
I was working on a site that has 4
The site looks fine under IE6 on my PC. Nice job.
Thanks but are your sure the menu is working??? It obviously doesn't in my
IE 5/6 (both W2K and XP home); hover disappear and links are not clickable.
tee
I was working on a site that has 4 absolute divs for two png images, a left
column
tee wrote:
Thanks but are your sure the menu is working??? It obviously doesn't in my
IE 5/6 (both W2K and XP home); hover disappear and links are not clickable.
Try it without the background png on the li.
I see you are using IE7 from Dean Edwards, but the magic of his javascript may
be
Sorry tee. I see what you're saying.
No, the links don't work.
You've got his code for the current menu item:
li id=activea href=# id=currentKarate Overview/a/li
I would suggest you could incorporate your 'active' class into the 'current'
class and so do away with one of them. This itself
tee wrote:
The site looks fine under IE6 on my PC. Nice job.
Thanks but are your sure the menu is working??? It obviously doesn't in my
IE 5/6 (both W2K and XP home); hover disappear and links are not clickable.
tee
Hi Tee: I just looked - and the menus aren't working for me. I
The rows and cols attributes - mandatory for any textarea element - defines
the *VISIBLE* height and width of the element. So why are they in the
mark-up? I've googled long and hard and haven't found anything to the
contrary. Surely these attributes should be defined in the CSS.
Any thoughts?
The two images work fine and the left
column seems working fine except it doesn't stay where I want it to be,
Tee, I figured this out. Change the width of your #leftColWrapper to
92px, the same as is in your books class. Small consolation though, in
face of the Dean Edwards(IE7) conflicts,
Thanks all, that is a quick and skillful diagnose :)
You've got his code for the current menu item:
li id=activea href=# id=currentKarate Overview/a/li
I would suggest you could incorporate your 'active' class into the 'current'
class and so do away with one of them. This itself could be
The rows and cols attributes - mandatory for any textarea
element - defines the *VISIBLE* height and width of the
element. So why are they in the mark-up? I've googled long
and hard and haven't found anything to the contrary. Surely
these attributes should be defined in the CSS.
Any
Tee, I figured this out. Change the width of your #leftColWrapper to
92px, the same as is in your books class. Small consolation though, in
face of the Dean Edwards(IE7) conflicts, eh, but thought I'd pass it on.
cheers
Donna
Donna, I was going to make 3 more cups of super strong black
29 matches
Mail list logo
