georg wrote:
Looks like you have two layers of some of those container-
borders, and
not all line up well in Firefox Opera.
Do you mean the navbarnthe header? do you think it will be ok, as im out
of time on this,
Slight weakness when font-resizing is applied,
Hi all,
I have a table of a schedule of fees that needs to have nested
ordered lists inside it. Each list item has an associated fee which
obviously should go on the same line.
With a bit of fiddling I can put a whole list in one table row and
get the prices to align (might work as long
On 04/01/2006, at 6:29 PM, Vicki Berry wrote:
With a bit of fiddling I can put a whole list in one table row and
get the prices to align (might work as long as everyone views in
the same sized browser window so there is no wrapping! Ha!) but
then I lose the association between each item and
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm is a great resource.
I find particularly interesting
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm#very , as it
demonstrates that accessible tables needn't be meagre and can, in
fact, contain quite a lot of structured information. It sounds as
Joshua Street wrote:
This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
Test case at
http://joahua.com/blog/2006/01/04/photoshopfirefox-10x-and-the-case-of-the-mystery-line
Anyone seen this before?
I used to see a weird line at the
kvnmcwebn wrote:
www.mcmonagle.biz/mockup/final11.htm
Looks like you have two layers of some of those container- borders,
and not all line up well in Firefox Opera.
Do you mean the navbarnthe header? do you think it will be ok, as im
out of time on this,
It is looking pretty ok
This isn't just a line, it's the background showing through. Plus I'm
seeing it on at least three computers with Firefox release 1.0.x
versions... so it's not JUST beta software. Could just be corruption,
but it's such an odd outcome I had to ask if anyone had seen it
before.
On 1/4/06, Patrick
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
It is looking pretty ok now. Valid code helps - at times :-)
This:
/div!-- navdrop -- --
...doesn't look good in IE6. The last comment-end is visible text.
Since you are commenting out navdrop, maybe it'll come out better if you
end it like:
/div -- !-- navdrop --
georg wrote:
Footer can't expand properly in Firefox etc. Looking acceptable otherwise.
I know this is not good but i defined a pixel height for the footer. The
background image of the div behind it was showing through the footer div's
padding. I will try and use a background image for the
Hi All,
We came with a W3C friendly solution to insert images with or without link in
the layout, being able to control it via CSS only, without writing the IMG tag
on the HTML code). It also helps Google and other search engines to find the
name, title or alt of the image.
Image Without
Hi Fausto,
A good way of doing it, but It doesn't work with
Images off and CSS still turned on, which becomes
an Accessibility issue. Has anyone ever resolved a way ofdoing this for
graphic links containing a rollover state? The problem is, IE doesn't let you
add a hover state to anything
Lea wrote:
Can you show us an example of what you have so far? It does sound
like it should be a table, IMHO.
Yes, definitely, I just don't know how to mark it up so I can keep my
lists and the table.
The existing page (that I now need to update) is here:
Fausto Balloni wrote:
It also helps Google and other search engines to find the name,
title or alt of the image.
Somehow I don't think Google and co. have any trouble finding the ALT
attribute on images already...
--
Patrick H. Lauke
kvnmcwebn wrote:
the html validates now
Tidy is still complaining of unescaped amp's in your title attributes:
ul class="navlist"
lia href="subcategory.htm" title="parenting"Parenting/a/li
lia href="subcategory.htm" title="childcare"Childcare/a/li
lia href="subcategory.htm"
Hi Fausto,
To cut things short:
there is nothing wrong with images used as background via CSS as long
as theses images are used as layout and not to give meaningful pieces
of information to the visitors.
You may end up confusing people who use text-only or speech devices.
Read this article
Paul,
on Wednesday, January 4, 2006 at 15:48 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
I thought the Gilder/Levin/Shea Enhancement Method was best, but
you can't have a hover state on a graphic link using this.
Example HTML would be:
a id=header title=Revised Image Replacement
Thank
you foryour help,Paul.
This
link will be very useful!!! It is in my bookmark allready.
(-:
Regards from Rio de Janeiro (Brazil),
Fausto.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Paul CollinsSent: quarta-feira, 4 de janeiro de
Hi Martin, thanks for your reply...
You can't use the :hover pseudo class on any
element other than an anchor in IE unfortunately. I don't have time to look too
far, but with a brief search I found this link that mentions it:
http://4umi.com/web/css/hover.htm
They say it will be fixed in
Apologies for cross-posting:
@media 2006 Unveiled
http://www.vivabit.com/atmedia2006/
The @media conference returns in 2006 after an incredibly successful
conference in 2005.
This time there are more presentations and panels, spread across two
tracks, and more speakers, including Eric
Vicki Berry said:
Yes, definitely, I just don't know how to mark it up so I can keep my
lists and the table.
The In you dreams solution.
Any chance it can be rewritten in *plain english* to remove the redundant
clauses and overuse of numbering? Example: clause 1(b)is already
*explicitly*
Vicki Berry said:
Yes, definitely, I just don't know how to mark it up so I can keep my
lists and the table.
The In you dreams solution.
Any chance it can be rewritten in *plain english* to remove the redundant
clauses and overuse of numbering? Example: clause 1(b)is already
*explicitly*
On 05/01/2006, at 1:04 AM, Vicki Berry wrote:
http://www.mrc.wa.gov.au/services/fee_schedule.html
The first decision to make is: is the numbering part of the content?
By this I mean does it have to be exact - if this is legislation then
you may well have to ensure the numbers appear, then
Hi list,
For about 8 years I've been working with HTML and web-related
languages. One day I discovered CSS and learnt (not much) about it,
but I never realized how powerful it is. Little time ago something
called Web Standards called my attention, causing me a very strong
curiosity. That's why I
Try this:
www.w3schools.com
It helped me a lot in the beginning.
Cheers
Paolo
Hi Alvaro,
A really good book that I'm sure has taught many of us lots is Jefferey
Zeldman's book Designing with Web Standards. It introduces everything from a
beginner's view, moving from tables to more standard markup and more css.
Eric Meyer on CSS is also a brilliant book.
Rachel
Hi AlvAro,
The WSG Resources section is a good place to start:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/
:)
Paul
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on
Hi Alvaro
Now I'm writing to this list to ask for books, eBooks, links, and
every piece of information that could help me to learn and understand
Web Standards and not feel like an ignorant when I read the posts sent
to the list, and, in a not-far future, help others too.
The Web Standards
http://www.alistapart.com/
2006/1/5, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Alvaro
--
.: marcello.côcu
..: IPwd - stúdio de webdesigner
...: http://ipwd.ppg.br
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi Terrence,
Because the document is written in leagalise I would not leave the
numbering up to HTML + CSS to interpret - hard code the values
instead.
I don't know *why* I didn't see this for myself. Thanks for pointing
it out.
Forget about using lists - clauses are *not* list items
Hi Lea,
I am very relieved to have now got the point that the numbering
should be part of the content. Doesn't that make (my) life so much
simpler? :-D
Thanks for taking the time to help.
Vicki. :-)
--
Vicki Berry
DistinctiveWeb
Web: http://www.distinctiveweb.com.au
Blog:
On 5 Jan 2006, at 4:54 PM, Vicki Berry wrote:
Forget about using lists - clauses are *not* list items
They're not? But ok, I've forgotten about using lists. :-)
I guess you could argue that it's a list of clauses ;-) but no, the
numbering has a very specific meaning that needs to be
I'd be interested to know what this group's take is on a practice I seem to
find more and more.
You go to a site, and it proudly claims xhtml/css/wai compliance. You do a
quick check, and discover that the code wouldn't pass xhtml 1.0 compliance,
let alone the 1.1 strict they claim! Their css
Nic wrote:
You go to a site, and it proudly claims xhtml/css/wai compliance. You
do a quick check, ...
Gosh. Don't do that!!!
Just think of all the hard work those poor web designers had to do
just to get hold of those buttons and create those links. Might have
taken them several minutes ;-)
33 matches
Mail list logo
