Hi all,
I have been battling with this simple layout for a while and would really
appreciate some help with it. Please ignore the colors/design etc. they are
for illustration only.
http://mail.nice.net.nz/test.html
It works as I would like it to in Firefox/Konqueror but not in IE. I would
Hadley Rich wrote:
http://mail.nice.net.nz/test.html
It works as I would like it to in Firefox/Konqueror but not in IE. I
would love the 'Some Header' in the right column to align vertically
with the top of the 'Other Links' and be fluid.
Adding...
#content_container {_height: 0;}
...or
Lachlan, The attached pic is a screen shoot from IE 6. Firefox 1.5 was fine...CheersAlOn 3/7/06, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
http://lachy.id.au/dev/2006/03/fieldset On OS X 10.4.5 Firefox 1.5, Camino - latest nightly trunk build, iCab 3.0, Safari 2.03 and
Al Kendall wrote:
The attached pic is a screen shoot from IE 6. Firefox 1.5 was fine
Yes, I know. I think you misread my e-mail. I knew it was broken in
IE6, I'm looking for a way to fix it. Any ideas?
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
There is another example and a way of do it...It´s in portuguese my native, but if you follow the cod it´s easy, and pretty-- http://www.artideias.com
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 22:34, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
...will make IE/win play along. These 'hasLayout'[1] triggers will not
be accepted by the W3C CSS validator, but IE/win needs them. Use
'conditional comments' if you want to hide them from the validator.
Georg
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
The following test case demonstrates how I want it to look and my
current solution that works in Firefox. Both examples in the page
should look roughly identical
http://lachy.id.au/dev/2006/03/fieldset
Don't know, but the following addition makes it look pretty ok in
hello,
How would i target a:hover on the following links?
I tried a few things but cant get down to the classes(one, two).
div id=navcontainershort
ul
li a href=# class=onebla bla/a/li
li a href=# class=twobla/a/li
I would advise against * html hacks though - http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2005_12.html#a000598Daz
On 07/03/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote: The following test case demonstrates how I want it to look and my current solution that works in Firefox.Both
Hey Kev,
#navcontainershort a.one:hover {}
#navcontainershort a.two:hover {}
Should access them specifically
Mike
Mike Foskett
Web Standards, Accessibility Testing Consultant
Communications
British
On 3/7/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would i target a:hover on the following links?
I tried a few things but cant get down to the classes(one, two).
div id=navcontainershort
ul
li a href=# class=onebla bla/a/li
div id=navcontainershort
ul
li a href=# class=onebla bla/a/li
li a href=# class=twobla/a/li
Start by thinking of the path from the body to the element you are trying to
select. In this case the path (we don't know
thanks russ and crew,
my mistake was that i was putting the class first...
like this
.one ul li a:hover{
background-color: #88CAEF;
}
-kevin
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hello ~
Im trying to avoid tables (for once!) and make a
header that has several columns in it.
I think Im very close!
However, I want to be able to vertically align the text contained in the
#headtitle div on the bottom and the #headnav1 and
#headnav2 divs in the middle. I have looked
This was a very popular problem, there some ways to try to substitute that lack...U could see some were http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg%40webstandardsgroup.org/msg26048.html
-- http://www.artideias.com
hey, I just had a quick look, its 2am so i should really get to sleep,
I tried changing the styles a bit, I been designing for year so I dont
know if this is the right way. I made the banner position:relative, so
it makes any absolute inside the div absolute from the relative
diveven though
Hi
all,
I have a strange
float that is dropping...
http://www.compassdesigns.net/resources/wsgtest.html
The layout is
straight out of Dan Cedarholm/s Bulletproof, a simple nested float. However, in
IE6, something strange occurs ("surely not!" I hear you
say).
As you reduce the
page
Stranger and stranger,
If I add a border to #wrap and move the margin to body,
it is fixed.
body {text-align:center;margin:0
10%;}#wrap {border:1px #fff
solid;text-align:left;}
Trouble is, this fix won't work for me as I can't have
a border on that element for my application, even a
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] said:
I am working on a liquid design of a website. The design fits fine into
800x600 and starts expanding beyond that. The problem I am facing is
that I want a 10 pixel border to appear on the left and right of the
design if the browser window is larger than
Any suggestions on web projects for my students this year
http://www.tomw.net.au/2005/wd/?
In the past I have got them to redesign the TV guide for the Transact
digital set top box http://www.tomw.net.au/2002/transact.html, check the
usability of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Web site
Barrie North wrote:
Stranger and stranger,
I have a strange float that is dropping...
http://www.compassdesigns.net/resources/wsgtest.html
Try adding...
#sidebar-2 {
margin-left: -3px;
}
...which will provide IE/win with some playroom for its rounding-bugs
without really changing
Tom Worthington wrote:
Any suggestions on web projects for my students this year
http://www.tomw.net.au/2005/wd/?
G'day Tom,
Could I suggest that quality projects present themselves quite easily in
the form of non profit organisations. There are many of these around as
we all know and
On 07/03/06, Darren West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would advise against * html hacks though - http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2005_12.html#a000598
Daz
On 07/03/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know, but the following addition makes it look pretty ok in my IE6...* html
Seona Bellamy wrote:
On 07/03/06, Darren West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would advise against * html hacks though -
http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2005_12.html#a000598
I tend to disagree with such nonsense. * html is a completely safe
filter to use now that we know IE7 will not be
At 02:29 PM 3/7/2006, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Seona Bellamy wrote:
On 07/03/06, Darren West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would advise against * html hacks though -
http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2005_12.html#a000598
I tend to disagree with such nonsense.
With all due respect, Lachlan,
Darren West wrote:
I would advise against * html hacks though -
http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2005_12.html#a000598
The * html hack will not pose a problem as long as IE 7 fixes its other
bugs and inconsistencies (it will just ignore the * html like other good
browsers, and -
Paul Novitski wrote:
These coincidental clusters of bugs vary from one version of a
browser to the next which is why so many hacks are version-dependent.
Like browser-sniffing, relying on them makes for fragile code. You
can get away with using them for the time being, but where's the
long
I would advise against * html hacks though -
http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2005_12.html#a000598
Personally I think building/testing/making long-term strategy for a
beta-version browser is not advisable. We will not know what IE7 can
and can't do until it is actually released. Until
Paul Novitski wrote:
Using conditional comments to work around IE's bugs is coding for the
future.
Personally, I have an aversion for adding cruft that only works in a
specific browser family to my HTML, which should be browser agnostic.
Sure, it validates, but it's just proprietary browser
At 05:02 PM 3/7/2006, Ben Buchanan wrote:
Conditional comments are a hack - an ugly, inefficient hack at that.
Planning for the future includes the thought hey, when IE6 becomes
irrelevant, I'm going to have to edit every single HTML document I've
got to remove this bloat!.
My point was simply
Paul Novitski wrote:
My point was simply that IE's conditional comments -- and ugly they are,
no argument there -- are more likely to work as intended in a few years
than hacks like * html.
* html hacks will continue to work in IE6 forever, just as they do
today. We already know this filter
Hi,I have a question about something IE6 is doing that Firefox1.5 is not. (I know... no surprise !)I have checked, but must have overlooked the solution to this one...On this page...
http://www.hudsonantiquecarclub.com/index.htmlIE6 adds an reverse indent just under the header Monthly Meetings
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
* html hacks will continue to work in IE6 forever, just as they do
today. We already know this filter has been fixed in IE7 (standards
mode), and so the following are exactly equivalent:
!--[if lte IE 6] ... ![end if]--
* html foo { ... }
I think it worth mentioning
Kevin wrote
On this page...
http://www.hudsonantiquecarclub.com/index.html
IE6 adds an reverse indent just under the header Monthly Meetings
Hi Kevin
Adding a couple extra pixels to the #content_home right margin should
fix things up.
Regards
Scott Swabey
Design Development Director
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I think it worth mentioning that the * html hack works in IE *Mac* too.
What about conditional comments? I don't think that really matters much
anyway, since IE Mac is officially obsolete (i.e. now completely
unsupported by Microsoft) and I think some unwanted hacks
Kevin Ross wrote:
http://www.hudsonantiquecarclub.com/index.html
IE6 adds an reverse indent just under the header Monthly Meetings
(Paragraph starting Rudy's...)
Is this to do with the thumbnail to the left?
Known as the 3 pixel text-jog
On Mar 8, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Jason Turnbull wrote:
http://www.hudsonantiquecarclub.com/index.html
IE6 adds an reverse indent just under the header Monthly Meetings
(Paragraph starting Rudy's...)
Is this to do with the thumbnail to the left?
Known as the 3 pixel text-jog
On Mar 8, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I think it worth mentioning that the * html hack works in IE *Mac*
too.
What about conditional comments? I don't think that really matters
much anyway, since IE Mac is officially obsolete (i.e. now
completely
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
ul a, ul, li, #content_home {height: 1%;} /* Holly hack fix for IE
bugs */
That is a bit radical... giving all those element 'layout' can
possibly cause more problems than it fixes.
In this case:
/* - hide form IE Mac - \*/
* html #content_contain {height:1%}
39 matches
Mail list logo
