I would have though a simple CSS width:100%; , height:auto might do it?
does it need to be a background and will it conflict with anything at
different sizes?
?
On Jun 30, 2008, at 05:15, dwain wrote:
On 6/29/08, Chris Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone been able to successfu
it seems that it used to, but the browser rendering has changed. i
read, not too closely, in the svg specs how to edit the files to make
it fit "infinite" screen resolutions.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Joseph Ortenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have though a simple CSS width:100%;
SVG is not really suitable for photos though.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:24 PM, dwain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems that it used to, but the browser rendering has changed. i
> read, not too closely, in the svg specs how to edit the files to make
> it fit "infinite" screen resolutions.
>
>
this is true.
On 6/30/08, Matijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SVG is not really suitable for photos though.
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:24 PM, dwain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it seems that it used to, but the browser rendering has changed. i
> > read, not too closely, in the svg specs how
I do it here:
http://www.sydost.no/
Like this, in
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0; padding:0;}
#bg {position:fixed; top:0; left:0; width:100%; height:100%;}
.outer_framework {position:relative; z-index:1;}
And then I include the picture in my html, not the coolest thing but it
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Matijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SVG is not really suitable for photos though.
>
Which is mostly true but SVG can contain bitmaps and as the goal is to scale
the bitmap to 100% anyway then using SVG as a container format would be
appropriate (or at least identi
This looks pretty good, I'll give it a whirl.
Thanks
solutions for a digital world
Exchange Server 2007
Built-in Protection, Anywhere Access, Operational Efficiency
BLUEARC WILL HELP YOU MAKE THE MOVE. FIND OUT HOW
Hi Guys,
Just wondering if there is a standards compliant way of implementing
'autocomplete' on forms, which I believe is proprietry...?
An example might be that there is a login and password field on a banking
site and you don't want the browser to remember the data. I realise there
are ways aro
Lisa Herrod wrote:
Just wondering if there is a standards compliant way of implementing
'autocomplete' on forms, which I believe is proprietry...?
Not tested it, but...could you inject the autocomplete="off" via
javascript to the form element?
An example might be that there is a login and pa
I have had the same question fluttering around in my head.
the thought process for me begins with Accessibility:
"can other people still get to the search result that the auto complete is
attempting to show if the are using a screen reader or have javascript turned
off, or there are bugs (like
2008/7/1 Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lisa Herrod wrote:
>
>> Just wondering if there is a standards compliant way of implementing
>> 'autocomplete' on forms, which I believe is proprietry...?
>>
>
> Not tested it, but...could you inject the autocomplete="off" via javascript
> to the fo
Please unsubscribe me
-Original Message-
From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:25 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: WSG Digest
*
WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DI
Check out the link at the bottom of this page...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart
Sheridan
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 9:30 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Please unsubscribe me
>
> Please unsubscribe me
>
hey gang,
to unsubscribe, go to
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
William
> Stuart Sheridan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please unsubscribe me
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:25 PM
thats right, I thought it was somewhere,
thanks Rick
> Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Check out the link at the bottom of this page...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Stuart
> Sheridan
> > Sent: Monday, June
Hey all im trying to make what i though was a rather simple site. All
is going well until now, i have this annoying gap under the nav bar
and i cant seem to see what causing it. Im hopeing its something and
a fresh pair of eyes will pick it up quickly.
anyway heres the link
http://serenal.net.au/
Many thanks
Polly Templeton
National Museum of Australia
National Museum of Australia
Winner - Best Major Tourist Attraction 2006 and 2005 Australian Tourism Awards
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines
bill kroon provided the following information on 1/07/2008 2:27 PM:
Hey all im trying to make what i though was a rather simple site. All
is going well until now, i have this annoying gap under the nav bar
and i cant seem to see what causing it. Im hopeing its something and
a fresh pair of eyes
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Polly Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Many thanks
> Polly Templeton
> National Museum of Australia
>
I don't know about you all but I'm maintaining a spreadsheet called "People
not to hire based on their ability to use the WSG list".
.Matthew Holloway
ht
Tables and inline styles. Interesting.
Look at all that onmouseout/rollover - there's an image border or two
specified. Could be those.
Good luck
//styles for the above element are in an external file :)
On 01/07/2008, at 12:27 PM, bill kroon wrote:
Hey all im trying to make what i though
Ha ha and yes!!
On 1/7/08 2:59 PM, "Matthew Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Polly Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Many thanks
>> Polly Templeton
>> National Museum of Australia
>
>
> I don't know about you all but I'm maintaining a spreadsheet
21 matches
Mail list logo
