On 3/26/07, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to incorporate a couple of simple flowcharts into the content of
a site I'm building, I'm scratching my head about the best way to mark
up this info in a semantically meaningful way.
On 3/26/07, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-w.com/dictionary/acronym
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym#Nomenclature
Dan Dorman
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
on the matter, since this is getting
awfully pedantic, but I am genuinely curious: if anyone has some
concrete sources on the subject, please let me know; off list would be
fine.
Dan Dorman
***
List Guidelines: http
to find a version of the OED through which I
could search.
If the OED says it, I'll buy it. Thanks, Nick!
Dan Dorman
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
On 6/21/07, Dan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
function alternateRows(tableID,numberOfColors,colorArray){
[snipped]
if (table) {
var trs=document.getElementById(tableID).getElementsByTagName(TD);
[snipped]
}
}
}
Whoops! I got a little careless. The line starting with var
partners and the font
for the gallery text is 80% in times new roman, times, serif. what i am
seeing in safari windows beta is what i described above and the font is
arial.
The Agora image is left justified in every Windows browser I've tried
it on: IE6, Firefox 2, and Safari.
:Dan Dorman
, because the validators don't even
_use_ JS: they look at the source the way it's originally served up,
before any possible JS modifications.
Or is this incorrect? Do any of the validation tools revise their
validation states based on JS interaction?
:Dan Dorman
