Re: [WSG] Re: XHTML Strict alternative to ol start=11

2005-02-08 Thread Jalenack
Hey, I'm new here :-) In response to Geoff's email, XHTML is the web standard of the future. If we implement it now, we are just helping move it along faster. A friend of mine recently created a php script that makes your XHTML into HTML for browsers that cannot support it. You can check it out

Re: [WSG] different hover for visited links than unvisited?

2005-02-08 Thread Jalenack
Yes, heres the code a:visited:hover { **styles** } Not sure about its browser compatibility, but I've never seen it not work :p On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:40:34 -0800, Andreas Boehmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering whether there is any way of creating a different hover effect for

Re: [WSG] Peoplesoft and standards

2005-02-09 Thread Jalenack
Hey, I have never personally used any Peoplesoft applications, but I can say this: A personal friend of mine is a Peoplesoft interface designer devloping web apps and uses dreamweaver as his only application in the development process (with accessibility features not on). I recently discussed

[WSG] A different Firefox bug?

2005-02-19 Thread Jalenack
Hi, I've encountered a very odd behavior on my blog using firefox (mac). http://blog.jalenack.com If you focus the search box, or the any of the form elements in the comment section, a ~200x50 box appears at the top left corner. I have no idea why it happens, but it has been happening since I

Re: [WSG] I hope this is not off topic, W3c validation error

2005-03-07 Thread Jalenack
There is no 'alt' attribute for the a element. If you'd like to display information about the link, use the title attribute: lia href=http://asic.bc.cx/asic_history.php; title=ASIC historyASIC history/a/li The alt attribute is only (as far as I know) legal in img tags...The validator was right.

Re: [WSG] Strange problem

2005-03-10 Thread Jalenack
Alright, I tested it in IE5/Mac, Safari, Firefox and Opera and they all turned up content. Seeing as she doesn't know what system she's on, I'd very much doubt she's running anything besides Mac or PC. Linux users tend to know they are running linux :-) It could have to do with this bit of CSS:

Re: [WSG] Css Floating Image

2005-03-15 Thread Jalenack
Hi MM, I tested your page in safari quickly...The image is floating correctly. Is the image being taller than the text messing your problem? There are many techniques to clearing your floats so that they won't overflow like that. The simplest of which: applying overflow: auto to the #wrapper

Re: [WSG] CSS validator says [xX][mM][lL] is not allowed.

2005-03-19 Thread Jalenack
It may have something to do with the PHP echoing the prologdo you have a special circumstance setup, like it only sends the prolog to mozilla or something? I think the validator is receving something that the browsers aren't. Also, I just checked in IE5/mac, safari, and FF/mac. Everything is

Re: [WSG] Draggable Items

2005-03-20 Thread Jalenack
I've also seen this done nicely at http://panic.com I'm no javascript expert, so I couldn't explain what they did. Just check their source.. They've got an example on the main page, but it all really shines in the apparel department: https://www.panic.com/goods/ HTH -- Andrew Sutherland