Matthew Pennell wrote:
>> I think it's been shown that just about all keys interfere with someone's
shortcuts,
>> whether it's a browser, screenreader, foreign characters, or whatever.
Frank Palinkas wrote:
> Interesting. Please tell me where this info is shown? I'd like to know
more.
Some Info:
)
> been built around the IE6 platform, which would be an absolute
> disaster for the department if IE7 was suddenly rolled out
If there was truly a 'minus one' policy they would only started developing
for IE6, when IE
> Jad Madi wrote:
> hmm
> what I want is , for example
> http://www.alistapart.com/d/slidingdoors2/v1/ex10a.html#
> when I click on any tab to be active?
> How to do it?
In the above example you change the body id of each page depending on
which tab you want to look active
Currently its set to
> James Cowperthwaite wrote:
> The layout problem occurs in IE (fine in mozilla). I want to keep the
> text flowing down the page in a straight line, but in IE when the text
> passes the end of the blue box, it moves in by 1 or 2 pixels
> (illustrated by the green left border for #main).
>
> I hav
Seona, Are you able to provide a link to the page, as images display ok
in IE6, with the code you provided.
Regards
Jason
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hint
> Bellamy wrote:
>
http://216.119.123.23/index.cfm?fuseaction=catalogue.ListProducts&ID=2&c
at
> egory=Subcategory
>
> Have a look, tell me what you see. If you can see them fine, then I
think
> I might just go quietly insane... ;)
There was definitely a problem in IE6 the whole navigation was in
> Seona Bellamy wrote:
> Hmm... Thanks, that did seem to make a difference. At any rate, the
images
> are showing up.
> But instead of tiling nicely across the page, they're showing one to
> a line and spreading over the whole width of the panel. I've had a
look,
> and I'm not sure how to fix that
> Seona Bellamy wrote:
> As far as hiding from other browsers, I was aware that it
> was hidden from IE/Mac by the commented backslash
> (that's what the tutorial said, anyway) but is
> there a more effective way of hiding it from all the
> browsers that we don't want to see it?
My apologies, s
> Diego Diaz wrote:
> Hello again :)
> I try make a righ side with some content but this right side cut when
> the text finish and cannot enlarge to the bottom site.
> http://proyecto.crono.cl
> I try with height:100%; on html, body and in the class too.
> The name of the class is #ladorecho and my
> Jamie Mason wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a firefox equivalent?
http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?application=firefox&id
=60&vid=63
Regards
Jason
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webs
> Jeffery Lowder wrote
> I'm looking for an example of a drop down menu that is keyboard
> accessible.
Heres a couple
http://www.udm4.com
http://www.accessibility.nl//amenu/index.html
Regards
Jason
*
The discussion list for http://webstandards
> Sean Ho wrote:
> I am having this caching problem everytime I update my CSS file and
the
> browser suddenly stop showing the new changes. This only happens in IE
> and Firefox occasioinally.
Have you tried force refreshing?
IE - hold Ctrl and select refresh
Firefox - hold Shift and select refre
> Kim Kruse wrote:
> 1. Why won't IE pick up the .tabs hover style?
Change the style .tabs li:hover
To .tabs li a:hover
> 3. On this http://www.mouseriders.dk/test/kontakt.php why
> is the background color flowing out of the fieldset (top)
This happens in IE, as this page explains
http://www.th
> Shane Helm wrote:
> http://sonze.com/lange/index.html
> http://sonze.com/lange/bios.html
>
> Now the CSS:
> http://sonze.com/lange/css/master.css
IE is doubling the margin on the 'right' and 'left' class, which of
course allows no room for the floats to align beside each other
Simply add displ
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was recently told by a friend that there is talk of a browser to be
> released soon by Google called "gBrowser"
>
> I have googled for any news on it, and what support for standards it
may
> have, but haven't really heard much..
Its been reported they have hired 4 I
> Richard Czeiger wrote:
> Hi guys - having a little problem with the whole external links in
> XHTML strict.
> Code's below - doesn't seem to be working - can you help out?
You were missing a couple of opening brackets, script below now works
ok.
Regards
Jason
function externalLinks(){
if
ement within the form.
Regards
Jason Turnbull
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Foundations, I though I
was on too many lists until I came across this one, great too been
invited and am enjoying the friendly and informative discussions.
Regards
Jason Turnbull
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See h
> Neerav wrote:
>
> So now im comfortable using XHTML 1.0 transitional how hard would
moving
> to 1.0 strict and then onto 1.1 be?
The move from transitional to strict you wont find hard.
This list of tags shows what is and isn't allowed in XHTML 1.0 strict, I
do not know of any browser quirks c
ech_feature01.html
Try adding font-size:0; to your clearer style
You have also specified a 5px margin at the bottom of the images in both
pic and piclast classes
.pic {
margin: 0 5px 5px 0;
}
The order is: top right bottom then left
Regards
Jason Turnbull
**
> Robert Moser wrote:
> Something like this could be used to
> demonstrate the advantages of using CSS vs table layout.
The only problem I can see is images referenced in the CSS are not taken
into account
Jason
*
The discussion list for http
> 7 sinz wrote:
> im trying to duplicate the effect at this site with CSS.
> The effect im talking about is where you hover over the plans.
> http://www.tel3.com
> this is what i got so far, and was wondering how i would get it to
work in
> IE..should i just add the DOM script from suckerfish DD's?
cart.com
Removing the vertical-align:middle from the btn class fixed the problem
here on Opera 7.23
Also remains how it was in IE6 and Firefox
Regards
Jason turnbull
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstand
v or html
element or adding a height to the containing div.
I usually add a height to the problem div (can be 1% IE ignores this and
expands) and hide the style from other browsers, which can be done with
IE conditional comments or other CSS hacks.
Regards
Jason
t
it is wrong.
Create a clearing class, font-size and line-height are added so it will
not take up any space
.clear {
clear:both;
font-size:0;
line-height:0;
}
Add it to a html element such as
or
Put this in just before the wrapper ends
Hope t
was the only browser causing trouble, and I tried many
different suggestions I found on the net
I found a post by Eric Meyer to add visibility:hidden, but that still
takes up space.
So I would also like to hear if anyone has a solution
Regards
Jason Turnbull
*
> Nick Lo wrote:
> Does everyone else on the list do this?
> For the sake of 11k that is cached on the first page load it seems a
> little drastic
I would agree its not going to save much, having readable code is much
more important, I wonder if people who do this also remove all
spaces/tabs withi
rticle has a list of doctypes and explanations
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/doctype/
Regards
Jason Turnbull
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
> Chris Stratford wrote:
> This STUPID bug with IE...
> why dont I see any padding for the content here:
> www.vipclubs.net
It looks the same here on IE5.5/6 and Firefox/Mozilla
It appears to have padding to the content
The xml prolog
will put IE in quirks mode and can be removed safely
Regards
> On this page http://www.pagemakers.dk/divtest/test.htm
> I have a problem viewing in IE 6. On the left side there
> is about 10-15 px space between #navcontainer and #footer
> and I can't figure out why.
> (CSS here http://www.pagemakers.dk/divtest/mouseriders.css)
Hi Kim,
It seems to be th
> Kim wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow your suggestion. The problem is if I remove the
> the #navcontainer will be shorter that the
content/sidebar
> meaning there will be a space between #navcontainer and #footer I
uploaded
> the corrected version here
>
> Would it be possible to "force" the #nav
> Kim Kruse wrote:
> I wrapped the logo and an URL in
> an tag, placed it right under the body tag
> and now FF is messing up.
> http://www.pagemakers.dk/divtest/test.htm .
Firefox has this displayed correctly
Floats need to be 'cleared' to move the following content underneath
What I would do
> Jamie Mason wrote:
> On higher resolutions the bottom of the pale tan nav area
> spills out 100% width below the content and behind the purple sidebar
:(
> http://digiscape.net.au/test/mouseriders.htm
IE wasn't clearing the right float, which I moved now inside the content
div, and also gave th
> Kim Kruse wrote:
> http://www.pagemakers.dk/divtest/
> Is the padding on the #content is not being picked up by FF
> or is it something else preventing FF from moving the #content text
down?
Kim,
The top navigation seems to be causing this, the #nav is floated left.
Add a clear:left to the co
> http://www.htmldog.com/articles/suckerfish/dropdowns/
As the hidden menus are off screen I found tabbing through the links
problematic, with the original suckerfish you could tab along the main
sections. I realise display:none has been removed for screen reader
access to all links.
Jason
> Kim Kruse wrote:
> Once again... thank you very much. It's almost embarrassing.
> Just out of curiosity... how long have you been working with CSS?
Just over a year now, I by no means an expert. I was fortunate in that I
started to learn web design using CSS, so I didn't have to change my way
o
> Neerav wrote:
> Anyone have an idea why the menu at left of http://www.h27.info/ works
> fine in Firefox 0.8, Opera 7 and IE 5.5 but in IE 6 when you mouseover
> the links they change from the image background into a white
background
> until you mouseout ?
Neerav, I'm not seeing this behaviour i
> Just finished article from a reputable web site, specializing in best
> practices. They suggest omitting the file extensions .gif , .jpg and
> .png from image files for bandwidth conservation.
Chris, Whats the URL for this article. I'm finding it hard to grasp the
reasoning, does it save on
> Kenny Graham wrote:
> I really hope I'm right, or I'm gonna have to go back to a lot of
> sites to fix a lot of “s and such.
> Philippe wrote:
> If you want to support Safari (with application/xhtml+xml), I'm
> afraid, you'll have to go back...
If these entities are not allowed when served as
> Patrick wrote:
> *browser support* for named entities can be flaky
Sorry I missed post
I'm still surprised that Safari has limited support
Thanks
Jason
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgrou
> Joshua Street wrote:
> Still keen to hear anyone's suggestions as to the Firefox 1.0.x render
> problem... :)
> http://sunrisefamily.com.au/current/content/meet/
No problems seen using Firefox 1.07 on XP Pro.
Regards
Jason
**
The discussion l
> Christian Montoya
> I told you, you are the author, as in, the markup-writer author... for
> every page you work on, the only person that can go in the address tag
> is you... or the webmaster running the site.
I would disagree, for example when a book goes to print, does the printing
house bec
> Terrence Wood wrote:
> Jakob Nielsen responded to my request for clarification
Jacob has used this request for his latest article
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/within_page_links.html
Regards
Jason
**
The discussion list for http://webstanda
I'm interested to hear if anyone in the US tried Microsoft Office live web
site builder, BETA is unavailable to us outsiders
http://officelive.microsoft.com
Thanks
Jason
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://web
Kevin Ross wrote:
> http://www.hudsonantiquecarclub.com/index.html
> IE6 adds an reverse indent just under the header "Monthly Meetings"
> (Paragraph starting Rudy's...)
> Is this to do with the thumbnail to the left?
Known as the 3 pixel text-jog
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/thre
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> > ul a, ul, li, #content_home {height: 1%;} /* Holly hack fix for IE
> > bugs */
>
> That is a bit radical... giving all those element 'layout' can
> possibly cause more problems than it fixes.
> In this case:
> /* - hide form IE Mac - \*/
> * html #content_contain {h
Kevin Ross wrote:
> is there a way to put that whole section in my Style sheet file? Or in a
> seperate file so I can maintain the rules centrally?
Move all your styles into a CSS file ie6.css and just link to the style
sheet as you normally would but within the conditional comment
Regards
J
> John Wells wrote:
> Can we get a summary of this CAPS lesson? Are we saying that:
>
> - ONLY when serving XHTML as application/xhtml+xml, stylesheet
> selectors must be all lowercase.
>
> Having said that, I'm a bit confused.
I was a bit unsure too as I thought the term 'selectors' in style s
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > No, it will not work under XHTML at all. The DOCTYPE is irrelevant,
> > XHTML is case sensitive and uppercase element selectors will not match
> > anything in XHTML. It will only work for text/html.
Designer wrote:
> OH Dear, I'm getting confused again!
>
> When I read t
Gaspar wrote:
> Could someone give me some links or some stuff that someone without
> knowledge of ASP could help implementing some improves generate GOOD
> (X)HTML
What version of .NET are you using? There is a big difference between 1.0 &
2.0. These following links apply to version 2.0
http://m
Gaspar wrote:
> I've been reading some stuff of Ms,
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479043.aspx.
>
> We use both .net 2 and 1 or 1.1, i think they dont care much about if
> a menu is tables inside a table but i fighting against taht proving
> that the weight is 3 /5 times more and sem
Michael MD wrote:
> ...however I might use that word on pages that require javascript such as
> those that use an external api to display maps.
> The only people able to use those pages are people using a web browser
> that can execute javascript... and 99.99% of such users would be using a
> mous
> Adam Hough wrote:
> http://dampsponge.com/pir/layouttest.htm
> Both are unaligned the same until i try and put a left margin on the
> .homebox class. If i put a 3px left margin on this box, firefox does
> exactly what i want with the alignment while ie is out of wack.
IE6 doubles margin on flo
> Zulema wrote:
> ps: butterflies in my stomach means that my tummy gets grumbly as if
I'm
> hungry but it's from being nervous; it's a common saying in the
States.
> As far as it being an in-code joke? No, at least i don't think so :-p
Nick was referring to you use of 'butterfiles'. Butterflies
> Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a popular sites to promote semanitc
> or compliant (or "good" in general) websites?
Guild of Accessible Web Designers have a 'Site of the Month' award,
voting is by members only, you can nominate a site at
http://www.gawds.org/poll/nomi
> Kvnmcwebn wrote:
> What ie windows 6 bug creates relics like the ones at the
> bottom of the boxes in the central column of this page?
> http://mcmonagle.biz/OTI/INDEX3.HTM
> I built these "ad boxes" ( the ones with the radisson logo
> in the central column) using the ala custom corners method
> tee wrote:
> "How does Asp/PHP works if &' replace to "&" because the
> '&' is generated by the server. He said he can't find any
> information on PHP official website.
This article from w3c might help in reference to PHP
http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/php-session
Regards
Jason
> Jorge Colon wrote:
> Dear Friends,
> I have just read and signed the online petition:
> "Proper PNG Support in Internet Explorer for Windows"
> http://www.PetitionOnline.com/msiepng/
Appears MS is listening, heres an announcment regarding IE7 & PNG
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/4/26.aspx
CSS 2 - W3C recommendation
CSS 2.1 - Working draft
Until CSS 2.1 becomes a recommendation, which shouldn't be too long
(deadline for comments was July), the W3C validator will use what ever
the current recommendation is.
Regards
Jason
**
The d
59 matches
Mail list logo
