Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari

2008-10-16 Thread Johan Douma
. There are probably other things that are different in Chrome than in Safari. Cheers, Johan Douma 2008/10/16 Ben Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine as Apple's Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome

Re: [WSG] labels as input wrappers + h6 in place of legend

2008-10-16 Thread Johan Douma
I've always used label arount input fields labeltext: input type=text //label without the for= attribute. I've never had problems with it, and I don't think I've ever seen any recommendation against it. Johan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/10/16 David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jason Grant

Re: [WSG] Flash replace Javascript in Future?

2008-10-16 Thread Johan Douma
file uploader, I'll have to work on that. Cheers, Johan Douma 2008/10/16 Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read the story on that page carefully. What has happened is that flash 10 has increased restrictions over what features within the flash plugin can be invoked via javascript. This only

Re: [WSG] Flash replace Javascript in Future?

2008-10-19 Thread Johan Douma
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, KerryA Sent: Monday, 20 October 2008 8:09 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Flash replace Javascript in Future? Johan Douma wrote: Flash is on 99.9% of the computers. Which is the sort of claim made often by Adobe. But, if we're

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

2008-10-20 Thread Johan Douma
is way better and not that expensive. Additionnally, smultron is pretty heavy for such a simple text editor. But I guess it's my old mac's fault again. Cheers, Johan Johan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/10/20 Gicela Morales [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Everyone, I've just migrated form PC to a new macbook

Re: [WSG] Font-size inheritance issue?

2008-10-24 Thread Johan Douma
mailing list. Johan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johandownunder.com www.no-mans-land.net 2008/10/25 Lynette Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good morning http://www.westernwebdesign.com.au/EWAN/index.html Two pages uploaded: Home and Operation. Does anyone know why the font-size (specified

Re: [WSG] Mark-up for physical/postal addresses

2008-10-28 Thread Johan Douma
the structure a bit. Cheers Johan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/10/28 David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] Darren Lovelock wrote: Why not use the address tag Because most addresses on webpages do not provide contact details for the author. and a definition list? Because addresses

Re: [WSG] li hover bg preloader

2008-11-06 Thread Johan Douma
Indeed a change in the background position using sprites, would be a good way. Besides you save a few http requests as well. You can checkout an ALA article about it here: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites2 2008/11/7 Henrik Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have done this previously:

Re: [WSG] li hover bg preloader

2008-11-06 Thread Johan Douma
Ben: Also there is this method I found excellent: http://inobscuro.com/tutorials/read/19/ : That's an interesting way of doing it! i'd never thought of that. Cool! Johan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.johandownunder.com www.no-mans-land.net 2008/11/7 ben kahans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also

Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements that have no height declared

2008-11-23 Thread Johan Douma
I often have sprites that are 800px or even more, I usually use 100px in between the images. But I think there's a limit on earlier versions of Opera that dont take images bigger than 2000px (not sure at all might be more). So I generally use 2 or 3 sprites if they get big, I still save a lot of

Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements that have no height declared

2008-11-25 Thread Johan Douma
to sRGB. Although don't forget to colour proof whatever you do; Mac sRGB, Win sRGB an then Proof Colors. Cheers, Johan Johan Douma [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/11/26 Dennis Lapcewich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return Receipt Your Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-19 Thread Johan Douma
It's working fine for me on Windows XP, FF3.1b2 No issues at all. Cheers, Johan 2008/12/19 Foskett, Mike mike.fosk...@uk.tesco.com Hi Nick, The issue shown occurred on two different PCs and one Mac running windows. It doesn't occur on the Mac version of Firefox 3. My PC is using

Re: [WSG] re: Firefox v3 and opacity on opacity

2008-12-22 Thread Johan Douma
if there's a reported bug about this? If not maybe report it and see if other people have the same bug. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ And what about firefox without extensions? Cheers, Johan Douma johando...@gmail.com 2008/12/22 Foskett, Mike mike.fosk...@uk.tesco.com Good idea Jon, Just tried

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Johan Douma
somebody else here knows about it ? Cheers, Johan Douma johando...@gmail.com 2009/1/8 Simon Pascal Klein kle...@klepas.org I think this comes down more to which font rasterisation engine a system is using. I don't think Safari on Windows for example has full access to AAT and Quartz and thus

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Johan Douma
://mail.google.com/mail/?zx=zux2r51mnf08shva=1#label/assoc/11eb4c430f775f2c ) Wait and see... Maybe leave a message behind on the bug page to make Google fix it. Johan Douma johando...@gmail.com 2009/1/8 Johan Douma johando...@gmail.com Hi everybody, Even though Chrome is based on Webkit, Chrome

Re: [WSG] Chrome and Safari render the same...or do they?

2009-01-08 Thread Johan Douma
to gain market share? Following the spec to stricly might make a browser too different and might stop adoption (even tho this is only one problem); most people will consider this a bug and as per spec... What's Google going to do? I'll stop there, this is an entirely other debate... Johan Douma

Re: [WSG] Image with borders due to Anchor tag

2009-01-16 Thread Johan Douma
I'm not sure if I understand the question... But it's actually easy to remove the borders from an image in an anchor tag using css, not inline. a img{ border:none; } When that's done, you can do whatever you want with the link or with the image. Johan Douma johando...@gmail.com 2009/1/16