[WSG] More on character encoding

I am assuming there are other web developers in Exchange environments that might have some insight into a problem I'm having. It's standards-related, I promise. We're a company that utilizes an Exchange server for mail and scheduling. We have lots of email addresses and lots of email distribution

RE: [WSG] .htm include file into another .htm

You wrote: >> Using standards, which is the best way to achieve this: 1. 2. 3. >> I don't think the way you include has anything to do with standards. *What* you include does...that is, whatever you include will be rendered by the server when the page is requested, and delivered to th

RE: [WSG] TARGET in 4.01 Strict

Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> For what reason are they annoying? You can't just say something is annoying because you think something else is better, you have explain what it is about it that is annoying, and perhaps the issue could be addressed to improve the method without resorting to popups. >> I'l

RE: [WSG] Making PDF and Word files accessible

e foreign characters for certain contributors, em dashes for others, different list designators for Macs vs. PCs, etc... The newest Acrobat (7 Pro) also exports to plain text quite effectively...not just RTF. It ostensibly offers an html w/css option, but uses inline styles extensively, so the plain t

RE: [WSG] Image Thumnail Advice

You wrote:   >>  3. paste the capture into PhotoShop 4. Transform/Scale the image from it's captured size (760 pixels x 550 pixels) down to a 165 x 115 pixel thumbnail  >>   First, don't use transform/scale. Use the Image...Image Size command. It should already be set correctly to 72 dpi, c

RE: [WSG] Site Check Win 2000

Sadly, it worked maximized but same wedge when resized. WinXP, IE6 1024x768 default Jona -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean | eCreate Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 4:41 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check Win

RE: [WSG] Site check (eCommerce)

Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> - Is a DL the right markup for the FAQ and Directions pages? >> I think a definition list is the most semantically correct markup for an FAQ. If you look at the w3 documention on lists it says that DLs "...consist of two parts: a term and a description" which is pretty